Transparency has evolved from an individual, dangerous power in Plato to a desirable, collective property in the contemporary world. This paper intends to give a brief account of this long and somehow surprising path and extract some interesting consequences for economic and political activities, as well as for information technologies. Six literary masterpieces are used to highlight the contradictions and dangers entailed by the abuse of the fascinating metaphor of transparency. In the end, what is usually intended when demanding transparency from a corporation, a firm or a state is more (or more accessible) information about it, i.e., understandable and abundant black and white data. This means reporting, picturing, producing material, becoming apparent, which is precisely the contrary of being transparent. We don’t want to look through, but to look directly at. The question, then, is not transparency, but opacity: what do we need and want to see, and how is this going to be produced?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alexander, K. (2007). The GATS and financial services: The role of regulatory transparency. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(1), 111–132.
Bartlett, A., & Preston, D. (2000). Can ethical behaviour really exist in business? Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 199–209.
Bindé, J. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris: UNESCO.
Carroll, L. (1998/1872). Through the looking-glass. London: Penguin Books.
de Cervantes, M. (1998/1613). El licenciado Vidriera, one of his Novelas ejemplares (Trans. by Lypson, L.), The Glass Graduate, in Exemplary Stories. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
de Cervantes, M. (2006/1615). El retablo de las maravillas (The Tableau of Wonders), one of his Entremeses. Madrid: Alianza. Available on line at http://www.cervantesvirtual.com
Descartes, R. (1985). Optics (Trans. by Stoothoff, R.), In The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. I, pp. 152–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
European Commission. (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility: Green paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Foucault, M. (1977). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Éditions Gallimard, Paris, 1975 (Trans. by Sheridan, A.), Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, September 13.
Goldstein, D. G., & Giegerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Giegerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hebb, T. (2006). The economic inefficiency of secrecy: Pension fund investors’ corporate transparency concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 385–405.
Islam, R. (2006). Does more transparency go along with better governance? Economics and Politics, 18(2), 121–167.
Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 13–31.
Macho-Stadler, I., & Pérez-Castrillo, D. (2001). Introducción a la economía de la información. Ariel, Barcelona, 1994 (Trans. by Watt, R.), An introduction to the economics of information: Incentives and contracts (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meuwese, A. (2008). Impact assessment in EU lawmaking. Leiden: E.M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies of Leiden University.
OECD. (1983). Transparency for positive adjustment: Identifying and evaluating government intervention. Paris: OECD.
Orwell, G. (1989/1949). Nineteen eighty-four. London: Penguin Books.
Plato. (1993). Republic (Trans. by Waterfield, R.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Smythe, E., & Smith, P. J. (2006). Legitimacy, transparency, and information technology: The world trade organization in an era of contentious trade politics. Global Governance, 12, 31–53.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478.
van de Klundert, T. (1999). Economic efficiency and ethics. De Economist, 147(2), 127–149.
Wells, H. G. (2005/1897). The invisible man. London: Penguin Books.
This work has been developed at the Department of Sociology and Philosophy of the University of Exeter, UK, and sponsored by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science through its MEC/Fulbright Fellowships program and its FFI2008-03599 research project. The author wishes to express his debt with both institutions and his gratitude to all his colleagues and friends at Exeter, particularly to Francesco Guala, Anne Meuwese, and Michiru Nagatsu. Special thanks must also be given to Teresa Erice, for her careful corrections of earlier drafts.
About this article
Cite this article
Menéndez-Viso, A. Black and white transparency: contradictions of a moral metaphor. Ethics Inf Technol 11, 155–162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9194-x
- Corporate social responsibility