Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The gamer’s dilemma: An analysis of the arguments for the moral distinction between virtual murder and virtual paedophilia

Ethics and Information Technology volume 11, pages 31–36 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Most people agree that murder is wrong. Yet, within computer games virtual murder scarcely raises an eyebrow. In one respect this is hardly surprising, as no one is actually murdered within a computer game. A virtual murder, some might argue, is no more unethical than taking a pawn in a game of chess. However, if no actual children are abused in acts of virtual paedophilia (life-like simulations of the actual practice), does that mean we should disregard these acts with the same abandon we do virtual murder? In this paper I shall outline several arguments which attempt to permit virtual murder, whilst prohibiting virtual paedophilia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Aristotle. The Poetics. In D.W. Lucus, editor, Aristotle. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1968

  • Brey P. (1999) The Ethics of Representation and Action in Virtual Reality. Ethics and Information Technology 1:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Cisneros. “Virtual Child” Pornography on the Internet: A “Virtual” Victim? The Law and Technology Review, 19, 2002

  • Elton M. (2000) Should Vegetarians Play Video Games? Philosophical Papers 29(1):21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson C.J., Rueda S., Cruz A., Ferguson D., Fritz S., Smith S. (2008) Violent Video Games and Aggression: Causal Relationship or Byproduct of Family Violence and Intrinsic Violence Motivation? Criminal Justice and Behaviour 35/3:311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy N. (2002) Virtual Child Pornography: The Eroticization of Inequality. Ethics and Information Technology 4:321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick M. (2001) Is It Wrong to Play Violent Video Games. Ethics and Information Technology 3:278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers T.M. (2003) Real Wrongs in Virtual Communities. Ethics and Information Technology, 5:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtual Porn, Real Corruption. The National Review, May 3, 2002

  • K. Walton and M. Tanner. Morals in Fiction and Fictional Morality. Proceedings of the Aristotleian Society, 68(Suppl Vol): 27–66, 1994

  • Weigman O., van Schie E. (1998) Video Game Playing and Its Relations With Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology 37:367–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams D., Skoric M. (2005) Internet Fantasy Violence: A Test of Aggression in an Online Game. Communication Monographs 72:217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worth S. (2004) Fictional Spaces. Philosophical Forum 4/35:439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia

    Morgan Luck

  2. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2678, Australia

    Morgan Luck

Authors
  1. Morgan Luck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morgan Luck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luck, M. The gamer’s dilemma: An analysis of the arguments for the moral distinction between virtual murder and virtual paedophilia. Ethics Inf Technol 11, 31–36 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9168-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9168-4

Keywords

search

Navigation