Abstract
Radio Frequency Identification, or RFID, is a technology which has been receiving considerable attention as of late. It is a fairly simple technology involving radio wave communication between a microchip and an electronic reader, in which an identification number stored on the chip is transmitted and processed; it can frequently be found in inventory tracking and access control systems. In this paper, we examine the current uses of RFID, as well as identifying potential future uses of the technology, including item-level tagging, human implants and RFID-chipped passports, while discussing the impacts that each of these uses could potentially have on personal privacy. Possible guidelines for RFID’s use, including Fair Information Principles and the RFID Bill of Rights are then presented, as well as technological solutions to personal privacy problems, such as tag killing and blocker tags, as well as simple aluminum foil shields for passports. It is then claimed, though, that guidelines and technological solutions will be ineffective for privacy protection, and that legislation will be necessary to guard against the threats posed by the RFID. Finally, we present what we believe to be the most important legislative points that must be addressed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
American Civil Liberties Union. (2004, November 26), “Naked Data: How The U.S. Ignored International Concerns and Pushed for Radio Chips In Passports Without Security”, (ACLU), Available: http://www. aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=17078&c=130 (Accessed: 2005, April 6)
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2005, January 19), “Working document of data protection issues related to RFID technology”, Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2005/wp105_en.pdf (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
A. Bednarz (2004, November 29), “Leeway found in Wal-Mart’s RFID Mandate”, (Network World), Available: http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/112904walmart.html (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
Big Research. (2004, December 16), “Consumer Awareness and Concern About RFID on the Rise”, (Big Research), Available: http://www.bigresearch.com/news/big121604. htm, (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
CASPIAN et al. (2003, November 20), “RFID Position Statement of Consumer Privacy and Civil Liberties Organizations”, (PrivacyRights.org), Available: http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/RFIDposition.htm (Accessed: 2004, September 13)
A. Cavoukian (Ontario Privacy Commissioner). (2004, February), “Tag, You’re It: Privacy Implications of Radio Frequency Identification Technology” Available: http://www.ipc.on.ca/docs/rfid.pdf (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
S. Garfinkel (2002, October), “An RFID Bill of Rights”, (Technology Review), Available: http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/02/10/garfinkel1002.asp (Accessed: 2005, April 7)
S. Garfinkel (2004, November 3), “RFID Rights”, (Technology Review), Available:http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/04/11/wo_garfinkel110304.asp (Accessed: 2004, November 3)
G. Gross (2004, July 15), “RFID users say no privacy law needed”, (ComputerWorld), Available: http://www. computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/privacy/story/0,10801,94543,00.html (Accessed: 2004, December 20)
C. Hays (2004, November 14), ‘What They Know About You’, New York Times. Sec. 3 p. 1
M. Hines (2004, July 23), “Portuguese pooches to get radio-tagged”, (CNet), Available: http://news.com.com/ Portuguese+pooches+to+get+radio+tagged/2100-7343_ 3-5281608.html (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
A. Jha (2003, July 19), “Tesco tests spy chip technology”, (The Guardian), Available: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0%2c3604%2c1001211%2c00.html (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
A. Juels et al. (2003) “The Blocker Tag: Selective Blocking of RFID Tags for Consumer Privacy”. In V. Atluri, ed. 8th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 103–111. ACM Press
P. Kim (2001, November 14) Auto-ID Center Communications. Available: http://www.cryptome.org/rfid/pk-fh.pdf (Accessed: April 22, 2005)
J. McHugh (2004, July), “Attention, Shoppers: You Can Now Speed Straight Through Checkout Lines”, (Wired), Available: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.07/shoppers_pr.html (Accessed: 2004, August 24)
C. Murray (2004, July) “Implantable chips get under the skin of security experts”, (Electronic Engineering Times), Available: http://www.4verichip.com/nws_07262004.htm (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
N. Ozer et al. (2005, February 7), Letter to Brittan Board of Trustees, (ACLU), Available: http://www.eff.org/ Privacy/Surveillance/RFID/schools/ACLU_EFF_EPIC_ letter.pdf (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
Retail Industry Leaders Association, (2004, June 21) Presention at the Federal Trade Commission RFID Workshop, Washington DC. Available: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/rfid/wood.pdf (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
“RFID”, (2005, April 21), (Wikipedia), Available:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFID (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
B. Schneier (2004, October 4), “Passport radio chips send too many signals”, (International Herald Tribune), http://www.iht.com/articles/541711.html (Accessed 2005, April 15)
R. Singel (2004, October 21), “American Passports to Get Chipped”, (Wired), Available: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,65412,00.html (Accessed: 2005, April 6)
C. Swedberg (2005, March 16) “New Mexico Kills RFID Privacy Bill”, Available: http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1449/1/1/ (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
“The EPC Network”, (2004) (SmartCode), Available: http: //www.smartcodecorp.com/solutions/EPC_overview.asp (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
“Victory for Students, Parents and Civil Liberties Groups: Company Announces it will End Tracking Pilot Program”, (2005, February 16) (EPIC) Available: http://www.epic.org/privacy/rfid/prs_rls-021705.html (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
D. Williams (July 29, 2004) “The Strategic Implications of WalMart’s RFID Mandate”, (Directions Magazine), Available: http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php? article_id=629 (Accessed: 2005, April 22)
H. Wolinsky (2003, November 9), “P&G, Wal-Mart store did secret test of RFID”, Chicago Sun-Times, p. 36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Vance Lockton has recently completed the M.Sc. program at the University of British Columbia, majoring in Computer Science.
Richard S. Rosenberg is a professor emeritus in the Department of Computer Science at the University of British Columbia; the third edition of his book, “The Social Impact of Computers”, was published by Elsevier Academic Press in 2004.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lockton, V., Rosenberg, R.S. RFID: The Next Serious Threat to Privacy. Ethics Inf Technol 7, 221–231 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0014-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0014-2