Skip to main content
Log in

Privacy, Deontic Epistemic Action Logic and Software Agents

An Executable Approach to Modeling Moral Constraints in Complex Informational Relationships

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present an executable approach to model interactions between agents that involve sensitive, privacy-related information. The approach is formal and based on deontic, epistemic and action logic. It is conceptually related to the Belief-Desire-Intention model of Bratman. Our approach uses the concept of sphere as developed by Waltzer to capture the notion that information is provided mostly with restrictions regarding its application. We use software agent technology to create an executable approach. Our agents hold beliefs about the world, have goals and commitment to the goals. They have the capacity to reason about different courses of action, and communicate with one another. The main new ingredient of our approach is the idea to model information itself as an intentional agent whose main goal it is to preserve the integrity of the information and regulate its dissemination. We demonstrate our approach by applying it to an important process in the insurance industry: applying for a life insurance.

In this paper we will: (1) describe the challenge organizational complexity poses in moral reasoning about informational relationships; (2) propose an executable approach, using software agents with reasoning capacities grounded in modal logic, in which moral constraints on informational relatio nships can be modeled and investigated; (3) describe the details of our approach, in which information itself is modeled as an intentional agent in its own right; (4) test and validate it by applying it to a concrete ‘hard case’ from the insurance industry; and (5) conclude that our approach upholds and offers potential for both research and practical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agent Oriented Software-AOS, Pty. Ltd. (2004) JACK, url=http://www.agent-software.com.au

  • M.E. Bratman (1987) Intention, Plans and Practical Reasoning Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Broersen, M. Dastani, Z. Huang, J. Hulstijn and L. van der Torre. The BOID architecture. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 2001). Montreal, 2001.

  • T.W. Bynum J.H. Moor (1998) The Digital Phoenix Blackwell Publishing Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • T.W. Bynum J.H. Moor (2002) Cyberphilosophy Blackwell Publishing Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Castelfranchi and R. Conte. Understanding the Functions of Norms in Social Groups through Simulation, In N. Gilbert and R. Conte, editors, Artificial Societies, UCL Press, 1995.

  • P. Danielson (1992) Artificial Morality Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Danielson (Eds) (1998) Modeling Rationality, Morality and Evolution Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn and L. van der Torre. The BOID Architecture: Conflicts between Beliefs, Obligations, Intentions and Desires, In Proceedings International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001a.

  • M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn and L. van der Torre. BDI and QDT: A Comparison based on Classical Decision Theory, In Proceedings of GTDT2001, Stanford, 2001b.

  • G. A. Governatori, Formal Approach to Negotiating Agents Development, In Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1 no. 2, 2002.

  • S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, 2003.

  • J.L. Pollock (1995) Cognitive Carpentry MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Thagard (1992) Conceptual Revolutions Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Van den Hoven and G.-J. Lokhorst. Deontic Logic and Computer Supported Computer Ethics, In Bynum et al. editors, Cyberphilosophy, 2002.

  • M. Walzer (1983) Spheres of Justice Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wooldridge (2000) Reasoning about Rational Agents MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wooldridge (2002) MulitAgents Systems John Wiley & Sons Chichester

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Wiegel.

Additional information

Vincent Wiegel works for a multi-national company in the financial service industry. This article has been written on private title. He has a Master’s degree in both economics and philosophy, and is attached as an extra-facultary researcher to the Delft University of Technology.

Jeroen van den Hoven is part-time full professor (Socrates Chair) at the Department of Philosophy of the Faculty of Technology, Policy and management at Delft University of Technology. He is also Professorial Fellow at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at The Australian National University, Canberra.

Gert-Jan Lokhorst M.Sc., MA, PhD, is an assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy of the Faculty of Technology, Policy and management at Delft University of Technology. He has published numerous papers on philosophical logic and is currently working on a research project entitled “Medical Images in the Health Care Process”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiegel, V., Van den Hoven, M.J. & Lokhorst, G.J.C. Privacy, Deontic Epistemic Action Logic and Software Agents. Ethics Inf Technol 7, 251–264 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0011-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0011-5

Keywords

Navigation