Skip to main content

The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata

Abstract

Traditionally, the manufacturer/operator of a machine is held (morally and legally) responsible for the consequences of its operation. Autonomous, learning machines, based on neural networks, genetic algorithms and agent architectures, create a new situation, where the manufacturer/operator of the machine is in principle not capable of predicting the future machine behaviour any more, and thus cannot be held morally responsible or liable for it. The society must decide between not using this kind of machine any more (which is not a realistic option), or facing a responsibility gap, which cannot be bridged by traditional concepts of responsibility ascription.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. S.J. Andriole G.W. Hopple (1992) Applied Artificial Intelligence: A Sourcebook McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.K. Belew, J. McInerney and N.N. Schraudolph. Evolving Networks: Using the Genetic Algorithm with Connectionist Learning. Cognitive Computer Science Research Group, Computer Science & Engineering Department (C-014), University of California at San Diego. CSE Technical Report #CS90–174, June, 1990.

  3. K.A. De Jong and A.C. Schultz. Using Experience-Based Learning in Game Playing. Proceedings of the Fifth International Machine Learning Conference, (pp. 284–290). Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 12–14, 1988

  4. J.M. Fischer M.S.J. Ravizza (Eds) (1998) Responsibility and Control. A Theory of Moral Responsibility Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Holland (Eds) (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.S. Hornby, M. Fujita, S. Takamura and others. Autonomous Evolution of Gaits with the Sony Quadruped Robot. Group 1, D-21 Laboratory, Sony Corporation Ph: 81-3-5448-5901. Tokyo, Japan, 1999.

  7. E. Llobet E.L. Hines J.W. Gardner S. Franco (1999) ArticleTitleNon-Destructive Banana Ripeness Determination Using a Neural Network-Based Electronic Nose. Measurement Science Technology 10 538–548

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.E. Moriarty A.C. Schultz J.J. Grefenstette (1999) ArticleTitleEvolutionary Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11 199–229

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.C. Morrison and T.T. Nguyen. On-Board Software for the Mars Pathfinder Microrover. Jet Propulsion Laboratory report IAA-L-0504P, 1996

  10. S. Nolfi and D. Parisi. Growing Neural Networks. Institute of Psychology, National Research Council Technical Report PCIA-91-15, Rome, Italy, 1991. (Presented at Artificial Life III, Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 15–19, 1992.)

  11. M.A.L. Oshana (2002) ArticleTitleThe Misguided Marriage of Responsibility and Autonomy. The Journal of Ethics 6 261–280

    Google Scholar 

  12. OTIS Elevators. Redefining Elevator Performance, Safety and Comfort: The OTIS Elevonic Class. Product Description, 2003. Available: http://www.otis.com

  13. K. Sasaki, S. Markon and M. Makagawa. Elevator Group Supervisory Control System Using Neural Networks. Elevator World, 1, 1996

  14. Schindler Elevator Corporation AITP: Artificial Intelligence Traffic Processor. Technical Product Description, 2003. Available: http://www.us.schindler.com

  15. A.C. Schultz. Using a Genetic Algorithm to Learn Strategies for Collision Avoidance and Local Navigation. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, (pp. 213–215). University of New Hampshire Marine Systems Engineering Laboratory, New Hampshire, September 23–25, 1991

  16. A.C. Schultz. Learning Robot Behaviors Using Genetic Algorithms. In. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing. Washington DC, August 14–18, 1994.

  17. S.B. Stancliff and M.C. Nechyba. Learning to Fly: Modeling Human Control Strategies in an Aerial Vehicle. Machine Intelligence Laboratory, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, 2000. Available: http://www.mil.ufl.edu/publications.

  18. W. Stolzmann M.V. Butz J. Hoffmann D.E. Goldberg (Eds) (2000) First Cognitive Capabilities in the Anticipatory Classifier System University of Illinois Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Strawson. Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, p. 48 Britain, 1962.

  20. B.-T. Zhang and Y.-W. Seo. Personalized Web-Document Filtering Using Reinforcement Learning. AI Lab, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea, 2000. Available: http://www.scai. snu.ac.kr

  21. Z.H. Zhou Y. Jiang Y.B. Yang S. F. Chen (2002) ArticleTitleLung Cancer Cell Identification Based on Artificial Neural Network Ensembles. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 24 IssueID1 25–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Matthias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthias, A. The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf Technol 6, 175–183 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • autonomous robots
  • learning machines
  • liability
  • moral responsibility