Students’ Note-Taking as a Knowledge-Construction Tool

Abstract

Note-taking is the hegemonic study activity at university and, in many cases, the main ground for educational interaction between teacher and students. This observation has given rise to an increasing interest in studying students’ note-taking and its impact on learning. In broad terms, three lines of research have been developed in the last 40 years: the effects of note-taking and note-rewriting on some cognitive variables (attention, memory, comprehension, and so on); the relationship between quality of notes and significance of learning; and the changes in the teaching methodology which may enhance note-taking. However, the consideration of notes as a symbolic mediator which in certain educational conditions may promote knowledge construction and transformation and, ultimately, cognitive change has received much less attention.

In a preliminary study of descriptive nature we confirmed that in the context of our universities note-taking basically performed a register and external memory function with respect to the contents which were to be assessed by the teacher. Only a reduced part of the studied sample attached notes an eminently epistemic function, turning classroom sessions into truly learning situations involving a strategic use (that is, conscious and intentional) of the note-taking procedures using paraphrasing, inferences, analogies and other rhetorical resources.

From the data collected in this study we initiated a research and educational innovation project in our respective universities which aimed at the modification of the instructional context so as to turn note-taking into a tool for conceptual change. These modifications had to do with basically three aspects:
  1. 1.

    Form students in the contextualised use of the different note-taking procedures so that they gradually acquired a “strategic knowledge” related to when and why a given type of note more suitably adjusted to the conditions of the note-taking context.

     
  2. 2.

    Turn students’ notes into a formative assessment tool through a process of external guidance and regulation carried out by the teacher with the objective of notes becoming a tool allowing for self-regulation of students’ own learning.

     
  3. 3.

    Establish note-taking teams in the classroom with the objective of promoting collaborative learning through the use of activities which emphasise interdependence and peer-assessment.

     

This text will present this project in detail analysing the results obtained and discussing the different degrees of influence which an intervention/approach such as the one outlined here may have on university teaching.

Keywords

construction tools formative assessment guidance system learning strategies note-taking strategic knowledge university education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berk, L. E. 1986Relationship of elementary school children’s private speech to behavioral accompaniment to task, attention and task performanceDevelopmental Psychology22671680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to learn, writing to transfer. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) & P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Vol. Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice, Studies in writing (Vol. 7, pp. 83–104). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  3. Benton, S. L., Kiewra, K. A., Whitfill, J. M., Dennison, R. 1993Encoding and external-storage effects on writing processesJournal of Educational Psychology85267280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castelló, M. (1999). El conocimiento que tienen los alumnos sobre la escritura. In J. I. Pozo & C. Monereo (Coords.), El aprendizaje estratégico, enseñar a aprender desde el currículo. Madrid: Santillana/Aula XXIGoogle Scholar
  5. Castelló, M., & Monereo, C. (1999). Como toman apuntes los estudiantes. Guide no. 4 of the Programme to support innovation in university teaching, Vice-rector of University quality, Autonomous University of BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  6. Castelló, M., Monereo, C. 1999El conocimiento estratégico en la toma de apuntes: un estudio en la educación superiorInfancia y Aprendizaje882542Google Scholar
  7. Di Vesta, F. J., Gray, G. S. 1973Listening and notetaking: Immediate and delayed recall as functional of variations in thematic continuity, notetaking, and length of listening–review intervalsJournal of Educational Psychology64278287Google Scholar
  8. Faber, J. E., Morris, J. D., Lieberman, M. G. 2000The effect of note taking on ninth grade students’ comprehensionReading Psychology21257270Google Scholar
  9. Graves, D. H. 1983Writing: Teachers and children at workHeinemanNew HampshireGoogle Scholar
  10. Green, J. L., Dixon, C. N. 1993Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classroomsLinguistics and Education5231239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guasch, T., Castelló, M. 2002Aproximación a la enseñanza de la toma de apuntes en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: un estudio descriptivoInfancia y Aprendizaje25169181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hicks, D. 1993Narrative discourse and classroom learning: An essay response to Egan’s “Narrative and learning: A voyage of implications”Linguistics and Education5127148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kiewra, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Christensen, M., Kim, S., Risch, N. 1991Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking: Strategies for learning from lecturesJournal of Educational Psychology83120123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lemke, J. L. 1990Talking science: Language,, learning and valuesAblexNorwood, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Lonka, K. 1997Explorations of constructive processes in student learningYliopistopainoHelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  16. Lonka, K., Kindblom, Y., Maury, S. 1994The effect of study strategies on learning from textLearning and Instruction4253271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monereo, C. (Coord.), Barberà, E., Castelló, M., & Pérez Cabaní, M. L. (2001). Tomar apuntes: Un enfoque estratégico. Madrid: VisorGoogle Scholar
  18. Monereo, C., Pérez Cabaní, M. L. 1996La incidencia de la toma de apuntes sobre el aprendizaje significativo. Un estudio en enseñanza superiorInfancia y Aprendizaje736586Google Scholar
  19. Monereo, C., Carretero, R., Castelló, M., Gómez, I., & Pérez Cabaní, M. L. (1999). Toma de apuntes en estudiantes universitarios: Descripción de las condiciones de un scenario específico. In J. I. Pozo & C. Monereo (Coord.)., El aprendizaje estratégico. Enseñar a aprender desde el currículo. Madrid: SantillanaGoogle Scholar
  20. Perez Cabaní, M. L., Carretero, M. R., Palma, M., Rafel, E. 2000La evaluación de la calidad del aprendizaje en la universidadInfancia y Aprendizaje91530Google Scholar
  21. Shambaugh, R. N. (1994). Personalized meanings: The cognitive Potentials of visual notetaking. Communication presented at the Annual Eastern Educational Research Association Conference, Sarasota, FL, 9–12 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  22. Slotte, V., Lonka, K. 1999Review and process effects of spontaneous notetaking on text comprehensionContemporary Educational Psychology24120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slotte, V., Lonka, K. 2000

    Note-taking and essay-writing

    Tynjälä, P.Mason, L.Lonka, K. eds. Writing as a learning tool Integrating theory and practiceUniversity PressAmsterdam
    Google Scholar
  24. Stahl, N. A., King, J. R., Henk, W. A. 1991Enhancing students’ notetaking through training and evaluationJournal of Reading34614622Google Scholar
  25. Meter, P., Yokoi, L., Pressley, M. 1994College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-takingJournal of Educational Psychology86323338Google Scholar
  26. Vigotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (comp.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 148–188). Armonk, NY: SharpeGoogle Scholar
  27. Wells, G. (1994). Text, talk and inquiry: Schooling as semiotic apprenticeship. In N. Bird et al. (comps), Language and Learning. Hong Kong: Institute for Language and Learning, Department of EducationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultat de Psicología, Ciències de l’Educació i l’Esport BlanguernaUniversitat Ramon LlullBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Autonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations