Advertisement

Union Revitalization: How Women and Men Officers See the Relationship Between Union Size and Union Tolerance for Sexual Harassment

  • Steven MellorEmail author
  • Lisa M. Kath
Article
  • 232 Downloads

Abstract

Larger memberships resulting from union mergers and consolidations have heightened the issue of union responsiveness to economic and noneconomic needs of members. In this study, we focused on a gender-moderated relationship between union size and perceived union tolerance for sexual harassment, in which low perceived tolerance (a desirable outcome) was anticipated as a noneconomic need relevant to union women. Data were collected from women and men officers (N = 120) in various unions. Officers were viewed as well-positioned informants on tolerance in relation to union policies and practices. As hypothesized, the data confirmed that women in larger unions rated tolerance significantly higher (an undesirable outcome) than women in smaller unions. No such tolerance variation was found for men in relation to smaller and larger unions. Implications for union revitalization and future research on union size are discussed.

Keywords

Perceived union tolerance for sexual harassment Union size Women and men union officers Noneconomic needs of union members Union psychology 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animals Rights

All procedures used in this study involving participants are in accordance with the ethical standards of the first author’s institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study in the form of an information sheet.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, S., & Whitefield, P. (2013). Rethinking organizing and leadership: Lessons from non-traditional, women-centered, labor campaigns in New York City (pp. 162–180). In S. Ledwith & L. L. Hansen (Eds.), Gendering and diversifying trade union leadership. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. C. (1978). A comparative analysis of local union democracy. Industrial Relations, 17, 278–295.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. (1998). Are union organizing methods gendered? Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, downloaded on April 19, 2014, http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/departments/ Strategy%20and%20Human%20Resource%20Management/Airaanz/old/conferce/pdf/bailey.pdf.
  5. Baraldi, S., Sverke, M., & Chaison, G. (2008). Getting members on board: democratic issues in union merger negotiations. Employee Relations, 30, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baraldi, S., Sverke, M., & Chaison, G. (2010). Union absorptions in times of restructuring: the importance of attitude towards merger in predicting post-merger attachment levels. Industrial Relations Journal, 41, 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barclay, L. A., Mellor, S., Bulger, C. A., & Kath, L. M. (2007). Perceived steward success and leadership efficacy: the role of gender similarity. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector, 31, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bednarek, R., Blumenfeld, S., & Riad, S. (2012). Union-division: on the paradoxes of purpose and membership scope in union mergers. Industrial Relations Journal, 43, 548–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brigden, C. (2012). Tracing and placing women trade union leaders: a study of the female confectioners union. Journal of Industrial Relations, 54, 238–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner, K. (2005). Organizing women: the nature and process of organizing efforts among US women workers since the 1990s. Work and Occupations, 32, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, K., & Warren, D.T. (2007). Race, gender, and the rebirth of trade unionism. New Labor Forum, 16, 142–148.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, J. S. (1956). Union size as a function of intra-union conflict. Human Relations, 9, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryant-Anderson, R., & Roby, P. A. (2012). The experience of leadership: Women and men shop stewards’ perspectives in ten trade unions. Labor Studies Journal, 73, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bulger, C. A. (2001). Union resources and union tolerance as moderators of relationships with sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 45, 723–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burns, C. D. (1943). The group-mind in trade unionism. Occupational Psychology, 17, 64–72.Google Scholar
  16. Carlson, J. (2014). Reform, new labor issues likely to keep unions busy in 2014. Modern HealthCare, downloaded on April 19, 2014, http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20140115/NEWS/301159931.
  17. Catano, V. M. (2010). Union members’ attitudes and perceptions about their union: winning a representational election following a merger of four hospitals. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chaison, G. (2001). Union mergers and union revival. In L. Turner, H. C. Katz, & R. W. Hurd (Eds.), Rekindling the movement: Labor’s quest for relevance in the twenty-first century (pp. 238–255). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chaison, G. (2004). Union mergers in the U.S. and abroad. Journal of Labor Research, 25, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chaison, G. (2010). Union mergers: the new interest and some old questions. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chaison, G. (2012). The new collective bargaining. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chandler, S., & Jones, J. (2003). Because a better world is possible: Women casino workers, union activism and the creation of a just workplace. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30, 57–78.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, P. (2009). Building more effective unions (2nd ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cooke, S. (2014). Viewpoint: SEIU 503 rank and filers defeat mega-local merger. LaborNotes, downloaded on April 19, 2014, http://labornotes.org/blogs/2014/02/viewpoint-seiu-503-rank-and-filers-defeat-mega-local-merger.
  25. Crocker, J., & Clawson, D. (2013). Buying time: gendered patterns in union contracts. Social Problems, 59, 459–480.Google Scholar
  26. Delaney, J. T., Jarley, P., & Fiorito, J. (1996). Planning for change: determinants of innovation in U.S. National unions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 49, 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dreazen, Y.J. (2000). Labor unions turn to mergers in pursuit of growth—Move reflects need to halt decades-long decline in membership. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition, A2.Google Scholar
  28. Fiorito, J., & Hendricks, W. E. (1987). The characteristics of national unions. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 4, 1–42.Google Scholar
  29. Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gennard, J. (2009). A new emerging trend? Cross border union mergers. Employee Relations, 31, 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Godard, J. (2008). Union formation. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito, & E. Heery (Eds.), The Sage handbook of industrial relations (pp. 377–405). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hammer, T. H., Bayazit, M., & Wazeter, D. L. (2009). Union leadership and member attitudes: a multi-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 392–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaminski, M., & Yakura, E. K. (2008). Women’s union leadership: closing the gender gap. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor & Society, 11, 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirton, G., & Healy, G. (2012). ‘Lift as you rise’: union women’s leadership talk. Human Relations, 65, 979–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirton, G., & Healy, G. (2013). Commitment and collective identity of long-term union participation: the case of women union leaders in the UK and USA. Work, Employment and Society, 27, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ledwith, S., & Hansen, L. L. (Eds.). (2013). Gendering and diversifying trade union leadership. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Mareschal, P. M. (2011). Women in public sector unions: Opportunities and obstacles on the path to activism and leadership. In M. J. D’Agostino & H. Levine (Eds.), Women in public administration: Theory and practice (pp. 193–210). Sudsbury: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  38. Melcher, D., Eichstedt, J. L., Eriksen, S., & Clawson, D. (1992). Women’s participation in local union leadership: the Massachusetts experience. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mellor, S., & Golay, L. M. (2014a). Gender harassment and negative mental health: What labor unions can do to help union women. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26, 21–34.Google Scholar
  40. Mellor, S., & Golay, L. M. (2014b). The conditional indirect effect model of women’s union participation: The moderating effect of perceived union tolerance for sexual harassment. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 148, 73–91.Google Scholar
  41. Mellor, S., & Golay, L. M. (2015). Gender as a boundary condition of models of union women’s mental health and participation in relation to perceived union tolerance for sexual harassment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. doi:  10.1007/s10672-014-9247-0.
  42. Mellor, S., & Mathieu, J. E. (1999). A discriminant validity study of aggregate-level constructs and measures of local union formalization, centralization, and innovation. Journal of Psychology, 133, 669–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mellor, S., Mathieu, J. E., & Swim, J. K. (1994). Cross-level analysis of the influence of local union structure on women’s and men’s union commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moody, K. (2014). Competition and conflict: union growth in the US hospital industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Osorio, I. (2014). With declining memberships, Wisconsin teachers unions consider merger. Workplace Choice, Competitive Enterprise Institute, downloaded on April 19, 2014, http://www.openmarket.org/2014/01/08/with-declining-membership-wisconsin-teachers-unions-consider-merger/.
  46. Patel, S. N. (2013). Have we built the committee? Advancing leadership development in the U.S. labor movement. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor & Society, 16, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richards, E. (2014). Diminished in wake of Act 10, 2 teachers union explore merger. Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel, downloaded on April 19, 2014, http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/diminished-in-wake-of-act-10-2-teachers-unions-explore-merger-b99174118z1-239150441.html.
  48. Rooks, D. (2003). The cowboy mentality: organizers and occupational commitment in the new labor movement. Labor Studies Journal, 28, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rose, S., & van der Laan, M.J. (2009). Why match? Investigating matched case–control study designs with causal effect estimation. International Journal of Biostatistics, 5, Article 1.Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, P. A., & Kaminski, M. (2007). Gender, organizational justice perceptions, and union organizing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 19, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stagner, R., & Rosen, H. (1965). Psychology of union-management relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  52. Strauss, G. (1977). Union government in the U.S.: research past and future. Industrial Relations, 16, 215–242.Google Scholar
  53. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 2010. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
  54. Warskett, R. (2004). Thinking through labour’s organizing strategies: What the data reveal and the data conceal. Paper presented at the Conference on Gender & Work: Knowledge Production in Practice, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada, available online: http://www.genderwork.ca.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations