Religious Accommodation in the Workplace: Understanding Religious Identity Threat and Workplace Behaviors in Legal Disputes

  • Kathy Lund Dean
  • Scott R. Safranski
  • E. Scott Lee
Article

Abstract

This study examined workplace religious accommodation disputes under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. We analyzed spirituality and religion in the workplace (SRW) legal disputes between 2000 and 2011, using case facts from 83 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decisions. Utilizing a multi-step cluster analysis methodology and thematic coding, we defined behaviors associated with court cases and demographics of actors in the cases. We found 15 distinct workplace behaviors that appear in SRW legal disputes, and seven demographic or descriptive labels. Cluster analysis using Jaccard’s index and MDS revealed multiple behavioral co-occurrences, indicating that certain problematic behaviors tend to occur together in the workplace. We also found that certain behaviors occur alone, potentially being problematic in themselves. Using religious identity theory and self-referencing theory as frameworks, we fit both behaviors and demographics into an explanatory model for our outcomes, providing insight into organizational conditions that may precede religious accommodation disputes that escalate into legal action. We end the article with a discussion of future research avenues.

Keywords

Religious accommodation Religious workplace disputes Title VII Spirituality workplace disputes Cluster analysis Multidimensional scaling Religious identity 

References

  1. “Avoid the minefield” (2009). Avoid the minefield of accommodating religious beliefs. Legal Alert for Supervisors, 5(103), 3.Google Scholar
  2. “Offer reasonable religious accommodations” (2010). Offer reasonable religious accommodations—and then insist that workers follow them. HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law, 3(2), 3.Google Scholar
  3. “When worried about religious accommodation” (2011). When worried about religious accommodation, keep lines of communication open. HR Specialist: North Carolina Employment Law, 5(1), 3.Google Scholar
  4. “Your ‘good faith’” (2009). Your ‘good faith’ goes a long way toward fair religious accommodations. HR Specialist: New Jersey Employment Law, 4(12), 3.Google Scholar
  5. Allport, G. W. (1960). Religion and prejudice. In G. W. Allport (Ed.), Personality and social encounter; Selected essays (pp. 257–265). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  6. Allport, G. W. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5(3), 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashforth, B. E., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Work organizations as secular religions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4), 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beatty, J. E., & Kirby, S. L. (2006). Beyond the legal environment: how stigma influences invisible identity groups in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beaumont, P. (2012). Religious intolerance on the rise worldwide, says US report. The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/sep/20/religious-intolerance-on-rise-worldwide. Accessed 19 Nov 2012.
  11. Blair, C., Plowman, D. A., & Smith, A. D. (2008). From zero to coding your qualitative data within a matter of hours: Introducing QDA Miner. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA, August 8–13.Google Scholar
  12. Bohn, L. E. (2010). Workplace Religious Freedom bill finds revived interest. CrossWalk.Google Scholar
  13. Borstorff, P., & Arlington, K. (2011). Protecting religion in the workplace? What employees think. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 14(1), 59–70.Google Scholar
  14. Brewer, M. B. (2007). The social psychology of intergroup relations: Social categorization, ingroup bias, and outgroup prejudice. In A. Kruglanski, W. Arie, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 695–715). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Buri, J. R., & Mueller, R. A. (1993). Psychoanalytic theory and loving God concepts: parent referencing versus self-referencing. The Journal of Psychology, 127(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1989). Self-referencing: a strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 628–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burris, C. T., & Jackson, L. M. (2000). Social identity and the true believer: responses to threatened self-stereotypes among the intrinsically religious. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cantone, J. A. (2012). Religion at work: Evaluating hostile work environment religious discrimination claims. University of Nebraska, Dissertation Abstracts International.Google Scholar
  19. Carpenter, S. L. (1988). Self-relevance and goal-directed processing in the recall and weighting of information about others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(4), 310–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cash, K. C., & Gray, G. R. (2000). A framework for accommodating religion and spirituality in the workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 124–133.Google Scholar
  21. Chamberlain, L. (2010). BA ‘crucifix case’ goes to European Court of Human Rights. Personnel Today.Google Scholar
  22. Cragun, R. T., Kosmin, B., Keysar, A., Hammer, J. H., & Nielsen, M. (2012). On the receiving end: discrimination toward the non-religious in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(1), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cromwell, J. B. (1997). Cultural discrimination: the reasonable accommodation of religion in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cunningham, G. B. (2010). The influence of religious personal identity on the relationships among religious dissimilarity, value dissimilarity, and job satisfaction. Social Justice Research, 23(1), 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dolan, M. (2008). California doctors can’t refuse treatment to gays on religious grounds, court rules. Los Angeles Times, http://articles.latimes.com/2008/aug/19/local/me-supreme19. Accessed 14 Dec 2011.
  26. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, R. (2011). Humanists, atheists drive for wider global impact. moneycontrol at cnbc.com, http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/wire-news/humanists-atheists-drive-for-wider-global-impact_597288.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2011.
  28. Exline, J. J., & Bright, D. S. (2011). Spiritual and religious struggles in the workplace. Journal of Management, Spirituality, and Religion, 8(2), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (3rd ed.). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  30. Giuliano, L., Levine, D. I., & Leonard, J. (2011). Racial bias in the manager–employee relationship. Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Golembiewski, R. (1998). Process observer: diversity as a shining goal or sham? Equifinality definitely does not apply. Organization Development Journal, 16(1), 5–10.Google Scholar
  32. Greenhouse, S. (2008). Muslim holiday at Tyson plant creates furor. The New York Times, (A20).Google Scholar
  33. Gregory, R. F. (2011). Encountering religion in the workplace: The legal rights and responsibilities of workers and employers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jaschik, S. (2011). Anti-gay student’s suit rejected. Inside Higher Ed, http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/20/appeals-court-rejects-appeal-anti-gay-students-challenge-counseling-rules#.TvEAqGotmJk.email. Accessed 21 Dec 2011.
  35. Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Cohen, G. L., Gastil, J., & Slovic, P. (2010). Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law & Human Behavior, 34(6), 501–516.Google Scholar
  36. Kelly, E. P. (2008). Accommodating religious expression in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 20(2), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly, E., Ellis, A., & Rosenthal, S. (2011). Crisis of conscience: pharmacist refusal to provide health care services on moral grounds. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. King, E. B., & Ahmad, A. S. (2010). An experimental field study of interpersonal discrimination toward Muslim job applications. Personnel Psychology, 63(4), 881–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kleiman, L. S., & Benek-Rivera, J. (2003). Handling religious accommodation requests: navigating the legal waters. Employment Relations Today, 29(4), 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (Vol. 5). London: Sage. The Sage COMMTEXT Series.Google Scholar
  41. Laderman, G. (2013). The rise of the religious “nones” indicates the end of religion as we know it, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-laderman/the-rise-of-religious-non_b_2913000.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2013.
  42. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilations and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lund Dean, K., & Safranski, S. R. (2008). No harm, no foul? Organizational intervention in workplace spirituality. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(4), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malos, S. (2010). Post-9/11 backlash in the workplace: employer liability for discrimination against Arab- and Muslim-Americans based on religion or national origin. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McColgan, A. (2009). Class wars? Religion and (in)equality in the workplace. Industrial Law Journal, 38(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morgan, J. F. (2004). How should business respond to a more religious workplace? SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69(4), 11–19.Google Scholar
  48. Mujtaba, B. G., & Cavico, F. J. (2012). Discriminatory practices against Muslims in the American workplace. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(1), 98–117.Google Scholar
  49. Paludi, M. A., Ellens, J. H., & Paludi, C. A., Jr. (2011). Religious discrimination. In M. A. Paludi, C. A. Paludi Jr., & E. R. DeSouza (Eds.), Praeger handbook on understanding and preventing workplace discrimination (Vol. 1, pp. 157–182). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  50. Pawar, B. (2009). Workplace spirituality facilitation: a comprehensive model. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  52. Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Thomas Solansky, S., & Villarreal Travis, D. (2007). Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pralle, S. H. (2006). Branching out and digging in—environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rubin, C. (2010). Religious discrimination complaints on the rise at work. Inc. Google Scholar
  55. Schaeffer, C. B., & Mattis, J. S. (2012). Diversity, religiosity, and spirituality in the workplace. Journal of Management, Spirituality, and Religion, 9(4), 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Staw, B., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  59. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2009). Workplace discrimination claims on the rise. Washington: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewforum.org/Religion-News/Workplace-discrimination-claims-on-the-rise.aspx. Accessed 1 May 2013.
  60. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2012). Rising tide of restrictions on religion. Washington: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewforum.org/Government/Rising-Tide-of-Restrictions-on-Religion.aspx. Accessed 19 Nov 2012.
  61. The Pew Research Center (2012). “Nones” on the rise. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, http://www.pewforum.org/Unaffiliated/nones-on-the-rise.aspx. Accessed 11 June 2013.
  62. Turnbull, L. (2007). Religious tension in workplace on the rise. The Seattle Times, http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2003566830_religiousuit11m0.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2011.
  63. Turnbull, L. (2011). Hertz suspends praying Muslim shuttle drivers. The Seattle Times, http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2016429949_hertz07m.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2011.
  64. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2005). Burger chain to pay $150,000 to resolve EEOC religious discrimination suit, http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-16-05.cfm; Accessed 12 Dec 2011.
  65. Weeks, M., & Vincent, M. A. (2007). Using religious affiliation to spontaneously categorize others. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White, R. D., & Jeter, J. D. (2002). Separating church and state or guaranteeing religious expression? Resolving religious conflict in the public workplace. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22(4), 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathy Lund Dean
    • 1
  • Scott R. Safranski
    • 2
  • E. Scott Lee
    • 3
  1. 1.Economics & Management DepartmentGustavus Adolphus CollegeSt. PeterUSA
  2. 2.Management DepartmentSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations