Skip to main content
Log in

Worker Appropriation as Responsibility and Right

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discussion of worker rights often focuses on the right to associate freely and bargain collectively. Such rights may not be achievable in globalized labor markets when workers do not appropriate the value they add. Relationships in which workers either participate in the management of the enterprise or directly appropriate their own surplus are more common than is generally understood. Recent work in economic philosophy provides an inalienable right for workers to collectively appropriate the fruits of their labor. Given the general failure of existing corporate governance systems, the case for worker appropriation as both responsibility and right is both practical and strong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Private communication from Prof. Olson, July 11, 2010.

  2. Thanks to George DeMartino of the Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver for helping me to think through the implications of the capabilities approach for the organization of work.

  3. This was clear from the stream of panels on alternative work organization at the 2010 International Labor Process conference at Rutgers.

  4. Thanks to Frances Viggiani of Alfred University for reminding me of this quote.

References

  • Budd, J., & Scoville, J. (Eds.). (2005). The ethics of human resources and industrial relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burczak, T. (2006). Socialism after Hayek. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burczak, T., DeMartino, G., Ercel, K., & McIntyre, R. (2010). Symposium on Are Worker Rights Human Rights? Rethinking Marxism, 22, 517–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, D. (1992). Property and contract in economics: The case for economic democracy. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, G. (2010). Union decline in historical perspective: The United States, 1880–2009. Presented to Union for Radical Political Economics, Atlanta GA, January.

  • Geoghegan, T. (2010). Consider the Germans. Harper’s Magazine, March: 7–9.

  • Gillespie, J., & Zweig, D. (2010). Money for nothing: How the failure of corporate leaders is ruining American business and costing us trillions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, D., Freeman, R., & Blasi, J. (2010). Shared capitalism at work: Employee ownership, profit and gain sharing, and broad-based stock options. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, N. (2002). State of the Union: A century of American labor. Princeton.

  • McIntyre, R. (2008). Are worker rights human rights? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, R., & Hillard, M. (2008). The “limited capital-labor accord”: may it rest in peace? Review of Radical Political Economics, 40, 244–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2004). Beyond the social contract: capabilities and global justice. Oxford Development Studies, 32, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, S., & Wolff, R. (2002). Class theory and history: Capitalism and communism in the USSR. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherell, R. (2009). Steelworkers Form Collaboration with MONDRAGON, the World’s Largest Worker Owned Cooperative. http://www.usw.org/media_center/releases_advisories?id=0234. <Accessed on August 25, 2010>.

  • Wolff, R. (2010). Taking over the enterprise: a new strategy for labor and the left. New Labor Forum, 19, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard McIntyre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIntyre, R. Worker Appropriation as Responsibility and Right. Employ Respons Rights J 23, 221–227 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-011-9180-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-011-9180-4

Key words

Navigation