Skip to main content

New Horizons in CSP and Employee/Employer Relationship: Challenges and Risks of Corporate Weblogs

Abstract

The present paper aims at reflecting on the role of weblogs in the relationship between employers and employees, particularly as a tool used within Corporate Social Responsibility activities. The theoretical framework makes reference on one hand to Corporate Social Performance (whose focus is the pragmatic activities of CSR), with particular reference to the stakeholder perspective and to Carroll’s model and, on the other hand, on the development of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) within organizational settings, with an emphasis on employees and corporate weblogs for internal uses. In particular, the present paper aims at presenting challenges, opportunities and risks, in terms of CSR, involving in blogging. A final section is devoted to understanding doocing and recommendations for setting blog policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. In addition, Carroll and Buchholtz (2006) stress an issue pretty close to our concern: how to manage ICT in an ethical way.

References

  • Albinger, H., & Freeman, S. J. (2004). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altus, C. (2007). Ragone admits to Blog Fraud, PRW eek, Feb, 12.

  • Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sense-making. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2008). Stakeholder marketing: beyond the four P’s and the customer. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 27(1), 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. (2003). Weblogs and journalism: Do they connect?, Nieman Reports, 57(3), 61–63 Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, M. (2003). Èconomie éthique privée: La responsabilité des entreprises à l’épreuve de l’humanisation de la mondialisation. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. Z. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical. Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 497–505.

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2006). Business and society. Thomson: Ethics and Stakeholder Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (1998). Corporate social reporting: an ethical practice. In J. Blake & C. Gowthorpe (Eds.), Ethical issues in accounting (pp. 184–199). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50(6), 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortini, M. (2005). (ed). Nuove Prospettive in Psicologia del Marketing e della Pubblicità. Guerini Scientifica: Milano.

  • Cortini, M. (2007). La costruzione della credibilità nei blog aziendali. Studi Organizativi, 2.

  • Cortini, M. (2008). From corporate websites to corporate weblogs: new frontiers of organizational communication. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture & Change Management, 2.

  • Cortini, M. & Ligorio, M. B. (a cura di) (2007). Economia del dono. Aspetti psicosociali nello scambio delle esternalità tra imprese. Aracne: Roma.

  • Coupland, C. (2003). Corporate identies on the web: an exercise in the construction and deployment of ‘morality’. ICCSR Research Paper Series, n. 2.

  • Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: and their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2004). Globalization and NGOs. Transforming business, governments, and society. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L., & Davis J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facca, F. M., & Lanzi, L. (2005). Mining interesting knowledge from weblogs: a survey. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 53, 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. (1978). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought (Working Paper 279). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Business.

  • Frederick, W. C. (1986). Theories of corporate social performance: Much done, more to do. Working paper, University of Pittsburg, Graduate School of Business.

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

  • Friedman, M. (1998). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In L. B. Pincus (Ed.), Perspectives in business ethics (pp. 246–251). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1985). Internal marketing—theory and practice. In T. M. Bloch, et al. (Eds.), Services marketing in a changing environment. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  • Hardjono, T. W., & van Marrewick, M. (2001). The social dimension of business excellence. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 8(3), 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. (2005), The voice of the blog: The attitudes and experiences of small business bloggers using blogs as a marketing and communication tool. PhD dissertation, Liverpool University.

  • Husted, B. W. (2005). Risk management, real options, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, M. (2008). The relationship between religiousness and corporate social responsibility orientation: are there differences between managers and students? communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, B., & Watlington, A. (2005). Using blogs for personal km and community building. Knowledge Management Review, 8(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. D., & Darrow, J. J. (2006). Employment termination for employee blogging: number one tech trend for 2005 and beyond, or a recipe for getting dooced? 2006 UCLA. Journal of Law & Technology, 4, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, C., Levine, R., Searls, D., & Weinberger, D. (2000). The Cluetrain Manifesto: The end of business as usual. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

  • MacDougall, R. (2005). Identity, eletronic ethos, and blogs. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado-Kierkegaard, S. (2006). Blogs, lies and doocing: the next hotbed of litigation? Computer Law and Security Report, 22(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raar, J. (2002). Environmental initiatives: toward triple bottom line reporting. Corporate Communications, 7, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, C. (2006). Wrote blog and got the sack. Daily Telegraph, 2006, July18th.

  • Romano, D. F., & Felicioli, R. P. (1992). Comunicazione Interna e Processo Organizzativo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (2005). Blogging and your Corporate Reputation: Part one- listen to the conversation. Factiva, Dow Jones & Reuters.

  • Scott, K. M. (2006). When is employee blogging protected by section 7 of the NLRA? Duke Law & Technology Review, 4, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytical framework. California Management Review, 58–64.

  • Segal, J. A. (2005). Beware bashing bloggers. HR Magazine, 50(6), 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todoroki, S., Konishi, T., & Inoue, S. (2005). Blog-based research notebook: personal informatics workbenchfor high throughput experimentation. Applied Surface Science, 252, 2640–2645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2000). The multiple bottom lines of corporate citizenship: social investing, reputation and responsibility audits. Business and Society Review, 105, 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 758–769.

  • Werhane, P. H., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Business ethics: the state of the art. International Journal of Management Review, 1(1), 1–16 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D., & Hinson, M. (2006). Weblogs and employee communication: ethical questions for corporate public relations, A Paper Presented to 9th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference, March 10, 2006 Miami, Florida.

  • Zorro, M. (2004). Plogs, http://www.markzorro.blogspot.com.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michela Cortini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortini, M. New Horizons in CSP and Employee/Employer Relationship: Challenges and Risks of Corporate Weblogs. Employ Respons Rights J 21, 291–303 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-009-9129-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-009-9129-z

Key words

  • CSR and CSP
  • stakeholder perspective
  • corporate and employees weblog
  • doocing