Accommodating Religious Expression in the Workplace

Abstract

Religious expression in the workplace has been gaining more prominence and attention with the increasing diversity of the population. Employers are legally required to reasonably accommodate the religious practices and beliefs of their employees. This article will examine the most common types of religious expression in the workplace and will discuss the extent of the legal obligation of an employer to accommodate those expressions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Africa v. Pa., 662 F.2d 1025 (3d Cir. 1981).

  2. Anderson v. OCTA, Calif. Superior Ct., no. 765255, Nov. 19, 1996.

  3. Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook, 55 USLW 4019 (1996).

  4. Ashmos, D., & Duchon, D. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(2), 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellah, R. N. (1988). Civil religion in America. Daedalus, 117(3), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Capaldi, N. (2005). Business and religion: A clash of civilizations?. Salem: M & M Scrivener.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Census Bureau. (2004). Question and Answer Center—Does the census bureau have data for religion? January 21, available at: http://ask.census.gov.

  8. Chalmers v. Tulon Company of Richmond, 101 F.3d 1012 (4th Cir. 1996).

  9. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos, 483 U.S. 327, 107 S.Ct. 2862 (1997).

  10. Curay-Cramer v. the Ursuline Academy of Wilmington Del, No. 04-4628 (3rd Cir. 2006).

  11. Eck, D. (2001). A new religious America: How a christian country has become the world’s most religiously diverse nation. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  12. EEOC. (1980). Guidelines on Discrimination because of Religion. 29 CFR 1605, 45 Federal Register 72612, October 31.

  13. EEOC. (2002). Questions and answers about the workplace rights of Muslims, Arabs, South Asians, and Sikhs under the equal employment opportunity laws. May 14, available at: www.eeoc.gov.

  14. EEOC. (2003). Muslim pilot fired due to religion and appearance, EEOC says in post-9/11 backlash discrimination suit. July 17, available at: http://www.eeoc.gov.

  15. EEOC. (2006). Charge statistics FY 1992 through FY2005. Available at: www.eeoc.gov.

  16. French, R. (2003). Shopping for religion: The change in everyday religious practice and its importance to the law. Buffalo Law Review, 51, 127–199.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuller, R. C. (1988). Religion and the life cycle. Philadelphia: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gee, R. E. (2006). Plan B, reproductive rights and physician activism. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(1), 4–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Golden, D. (2006). A test of faith. Wall Street Journal. January 7–8. A1, A8.

  20. Harrington, W. J., Preziosi, R. C., & Gooden, D. J. (2001). Perceptions of workplace spirituality among professionals and executives. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13(3), 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hicks, D. (2003). Religion and the workplace: Pluralism, Spirituality, Leadership. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kosmin, B., Mayer, E., & Keysar, A. (2001). American religious identification survey 2001. New York: Graduate Center of the City University of New York Available at: www.gc.cuny.edu/faculty/research_studies/aris.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  23. LaViolette v. Daley, 2000 EEOPUB LEXIS 4858.

  24. Learner, N. (2004). Employers attempt to balance work and religion. Christian Science Monitor, April 12. Available at: http://www.csmonitor.com.

  25. Mead, W. (2006). God’s country. Foreign Affairs, 85(5), 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitroff, I., & Denton, E. (1999). A spiritual audit of corporate America: A hard look at Spirituality, Religion and Values in the Workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  27. National Conference of State Legislatures (2006). Pharmacist conscience clauses: Laws and legislation—Updated October 2006. Available at: http://www.ncsl.org.

  28. Nolan, J. (2006). Doing the right thing: A Catholic’s guide to faith, business and ethics. Cincinnati: St. Anthony Messenger.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peterson V. Wilmur Communications, Inc., 205 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2002).

  30. Ritter, J. (2004). The legal definition of religion: From eating cat food to white supremacy. Touro Law Review, 20(3), 751–801.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F.3d 771 (1998).

  32. Rubin, A. (2005). Walgreens suspends pharmacists for refusing to fill a morning after. November 28. Available at: http://www.ksdk.com.

  33. Stewart, K. (2006). Suit says Marriott rejected Muslims. Courier-Journal.com. July 29. Available at: http://www.courier-journal.com.

  34. Swank, D. (2002). Cold fusion confusion: The equal employment opportunity commission’s incredible interpretation of religion in LaViolette v. Daley. Army Lawyer, 74–78, March.

  35. Thomas v. National Association of Letter Carriers and US Postal Service, 225 F.3d 1149 (2000).

  36. Tischler, L. (1999). The growing interest in spirituality in business: A long term socio-economic explanation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(4), 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Turpen v. Missouri–Kansas–Texas R.R. Co., 736 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir.1984).

  38. TWA v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977).

  39. United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965).

  40. United States v. Bush, 509 F.2d776 (7th Cir. 1975).

  41. Welsh v. United States, 398 U.S. 333 (1970).

  42. Wilson v. US West Communications 58 F.3d 1337 (8th Cir. 1995).

  43. US Congress. (2007). Workplace Religious Freedom Act of 2007. (H.R. 1431).

  44. US Government. (1964). Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(j).

  45. Zeinab Ali v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, 2001 U.S.App. LEXIS 3389.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eileen P. Kelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, E.P. Accommodating Religious Expression in the Workplace. Employ Respons Rights J 20, 45–56 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-007-9059-6

Download citation

Key words

  • religious expression
  • discrimination
  • workplace
  • accommodation