Abstract
The changing legal landscape of the right of the employer to control and monitor employee behavior is examined. Two distinct areas are defined: behavioral monitoring and behavioral restrictions. Relevant statutory laws and the developing common law are discussed. We also examine potential employee reactions to such policies by evaluating the reactions of graduate students to six employer policies including weight restrictions, grooming requirements, use of GPS locators, drug testing, ban on off-duty smoking, and email and internet monitoring. Students responded to these policies by determining the reasonable interest of the employer in the behaviors being monitored or controlled and the manner in which policies were implemented. Their comments suggest that employees may accept some level of monitoring or behavioral restrictions if the employer can make a convincing social account of the need for a policy. Additionally, the policy must be clearly communicated and properly implemented. However, restrictions on off-duty behavior were typically poorly received with the exception of illegal drug use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benner, J. (2001). South Dakota: Fire, don’t filter, wired news. July 7, http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,44357,00.html.
Cadrain, D. (2005). GPS use rising: Employee complaints likely to follow. society for human resource management HR news. February 9, http://www.shrm.org/hrnews_published/archives/CMS_011327.asp.
Cohen, C. F., & Balfour, A. (1998). Emerging issues in Title VII and Employment Appearance Codes. Journal of Individual Employment Rights, 7, 97–121.
Hoffman, L., Clinebell, S., & Kilpatrick, J. (1997). Office romances: The new battleground over employees’ right to privacy and the employers’ right to intervene. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10, 263–275.
King, N. J. (2003). Electronic monitoring to promote national security. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15, 127–147.
Kovach, K. A., Conner, S. J, Livneh, T., Scallan, K. M., & Schwartz, R. L. (2000b). Electronic communication in the workplace—Something’s got to give. Business Horizons, 4, 59–64.
Kovach, K. A., Jordan, J., Tansey, K., & Framinan, E. (2000a). The balance between employee privacy and employer interests. Business and Society Review, 105, 289–298.
Robinson v. Detroit Medical Center 2005 Mich. App. Lexis 569, 2005.
Rushing v. Hershey Chocolate, 2000 U.S. App Lexis 27392, 6th Cir. 2000.
Scott, B. L. (2000–2001) Employee e-mail: A protected right to privacy. Journal of Individual Employment Rights, 9, 27–37.
Shoars v. Epson America, Inc., No. B073243 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991), review denied, 1994 Cal. LEXIS 3670, 1994.
Shulman, A. (2001). The extent of systematic monitoring of employee e-mail and internet usage. Workplace Surveillance Project, The Privacy Foundation.
Shumaker, T. A. (2002). An employee privacy policy fairly applied can prevent privacy litigation. National Public Accountant, 46, 31–33.
Smith v. Pillsbury, Inc. 914 F. Supp. 97, E.D. Pa., 1996.
Sugarman, S. D. (2003). Lifestyle discrimination in employment. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 24, 378–437.
Tabak, F., & Smith, W. P. (2005). Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17, 173–189.
Taylor, P., & Gain, P. (1999) An assembly line in the head: Work and employee relations in the call center. Industrial Relations, 30, 101–117.
Warren, S. B., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193–220.
York v. General Electric Co., 759 N.E. 2d. 865, Ohio App. 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, C.F., Cohen, M.E. On-duty and Off-duty: Employee Right to Privacy and Employer’s Right to Control in the Private Sector. Employ Respons Rights J 19, 235–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-007-9050-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-007-9050-2