The Structured Interview: Reducing Biases Toward Job Applicants with Physical Disabilities
- 1.2k Downloads
Research shows that the traditional job interview is a poor indication of a candidate's potential. However, when employers structure the interview process, they are more effective at predicting success, forming consistent evaluations, and reducing discrimination. The current study tested whether the structured interview also serves to reduce biases involved in interviewing applicants who have a physical disability. In the non-structured interview, results showed that there was a leniency bias, where raters evaluated disabled candidates more positively than equally qualified non-disabled candidates. Structured interviews reduced this effect. These findings add to the support for the structured interview as a way of increasing fairness in employee selection.
Key wordsstructured interview employment selection disabled discrimination
- Bricout, J., & Bentley, K. (2000). Disability status and perceptions of employability by employers. Social Work Research, 24, 87–95.Google Scholar
- Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 79, 655–702.Google Scholar
- Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25–42.Google Scholar
- Christman, L., & Branson, D. (1990). Influence of physical disability and dress of female job applicants on interviewers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8, 51–57.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 95–121). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Harris, M. M., & Eder, R. W. (1999). The state of employment interview practice: Commentary and extension. In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Eds.), The employment interview handbook (pp. 369–398). Thousands Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kelly, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151–174). Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
- Mercer, M. W., & Seres, J. J. (1987, June). Using scorable interview “tests” in hiring. Personnel, 57–60.Google Scholar
- Parsons, C., Liden, R., & Bauer, T. (2001). Person perception in employment interviews. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organization (pp. 67–90). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Posthuma, R., Morgeson, F., & Campion, M. (2002). Beyond employment interview validity: A comprehensive narrative review of recent research and trends over time. Personnel Psychology, 55, 1–81.Google Scholar
- Pulakos, E. D., & Schmitt, N. (1995). Experience-based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity. Personnel Psychology, 48, 289–308.Google Scholar
- US Department of Justice (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act. http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/pubs/ada.txt.
- US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section (2002, May). A guide to disability rights laws. http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/cguide.htm.
- US Department of Labor, Employment, and Training Administration (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th edition). Lanham, Maryland: Bernan Press.Google Scholar
- US Department of Labor, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/Title_41/Part_60-3/toc.htm.
- Waldrop, J., & Stern, S. (2003, March). Census 2000 brief. US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disability.html.
- Wiesner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275–290.Google Scholar
- Wright, P. M., Lichtenfels, P. A., & Pursell, E. D. (1989). The structured interview: Additional studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 191–199.Google Scholar