Abstract
This qualitative case study examines the implementation of Escuela Nueva, a rural multigrade schooling model, in Vietnam from the perspectives and experiences of local teachers and school administrators. Escuela Nueva first emerged in Colombia in the 1970s as a scalable low-cost educational innovation model that can be disseminated to other under-resourced regions around the world. Indeed, to date, the model has travelled to fourteen countries around the world, impacting the lives of over five million children. On the surface, the implementation of Vietnam Escuela Nueva (VNEN) appears to be a close reproduction of the original model. However, some aspects of VNEN in practice in fact directly contradict the principles and philosophies of the original model. Rather than encouraging more teacher autonomy, child-centered pedagogies, and local adaptation, the implementation of VNEN has reproduced the rigidity, conformity and textbook dependency that have been core features of the traditional Vietnamese education system. This points to the difficulties that can arise when attempts at scaling up educational change across borders come into conflict with local systems of reasoning, which impede the achievement of the intended outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
More detail on methodology and methods is available in another publication (Le 2018).
The names of both schools have been changed.
In late 2015, the VNEN project suddenly became the center of media attention after an article criticizing the inefficiency of international aid to education in the country. The initial critique of the financial aspects of the project paved the way for teachers, parents, administrators, and some officials to comment and criticize the inapplicability of this model in Vietnam. For over a month, it seemed as if at least one new article on VNEN was published daily. In particular, giaoduc.net—the online newspaper covering educational issues—created an official series on VNEN and invited readers from all backgrounds to contribute op-eds.
These issues of textbook shortage are prevalent throughout the country and also present another major challenge in implementation (Ha Ngan, 2015).
References
Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2003). A world culture of schooling? Local meanings, global schooling (pp. 1–26). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Attfield, I., & Vu, B. T. (2013). A rising tide of primary school standards—The role of data systems in improving equitable access for all to quality education in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 33, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.02.003.
Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2016). PISA, policy and persuasion: Translating complex conditions into education ‘best practice’. Comparative Education, 52(2), 202–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1143278.
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York: Routledge.
Bayly, S. (2014). How to forge a creative student-citizen: Achieving the positive in today’s Vietnam. Modern Asian Studies, 48(2014), 493–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X13000504.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2015). Making policy move: Towards a politics of translation and assemblage. Bristol and Chicago: Policy Press.
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003.
Colbert, V., & Arboleda, J. (2016). Bringing a student-centered participatory pedagogy to scale in Colombia. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9283-7.
Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”? Educational Theory, 50(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2000.00427.x.
Dang Tu An. (2015). Mo hinh Truong hoc moi Viet Nam: Nhin tu goc do thuc tien va li luan [Vietnam Escuela Nueva model: From practical and theoretical perspectives]. Hanoi, VN: Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Do Quyen. (2015, December 7). Hoc VNEN, nguoi ta lam san moi thu, chi dien vai so la xong [In VNEN, they did everything beforehand, we only need to fill in the blanks]. Giao Duc Viet Nam [Vietnamese Education]. Hanoi, VN.
Duggan, S. (2001). Educational reform in Viet Nam: A process of change or continuity? Comparative Education, 37(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060120043411.
Forero-Pineda, C., Escobar-Rodriguez, D., & Molina, D. (2006). Escuela Nueva’s impact on the peaceful social interaction of children in Colombia. In A. W. Little (Ed.), Education for All and multigrade teaching: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 265–300). Dordrecht: Springer.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Ha Ngan. (2015, December 29). Muon VNEN thanh cong thi can phai thay doi mot so tieu chi danh gia [If VNEN is to succeed we must change some assessment criteria]. Giao Duc Viet Nam [Vietnamese Education]. Hanoi, VN. http://giaoduc.net.vn/Giao-duc-24h/Muon-VNEN-thanh-cong-thi-can-thay-doi-mot-so-tieu-chi-danh-gia-post164329.gd. Accessed 25 July 2018.
Hamano, T. (2008). Educational reform and teacher education in Vietnam. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 34(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470802401693.
Kamibeppu, T. (2009). Education reform context and process in Vietnam. In Y. Hirosato & Y. Kitamura (Eds.), The political economy of educational reforms in Southeast Asia (pp. 169–189). Netherlands: Springer.
Le, H. M. (2018). The reproduction of ‘best practice’: Following Escuela Nueva to the Philippines and Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.02.005.
Lincicome, M. E. (1995). Introduction: Knowledge and power in modern Japan. Principle, praxis, and the politics of educational reform in Meiji Japan (pp. 1–17). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Little, A. W. (2001). Multigrade teaching: Towards an international research and policy agenda. International Journal of Educational Development, 21, 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(01)00011-6.
Mogollón, O., & Solano, M. (2011). Active schools: Our convictions for improving the quality of education. Washington, DC: FHI360.
Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (2016). Introduction: The globalization of education policy—Key approaches and debates. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook of global education policy (pp. 1–20). Malden, MA: Wiley.
Nguyen, T. Q. T. (2015). The influence of traditional beliefs on Vietnamese college lecturers’ perceptions of face. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1031542.
Nguyen, H. T. M., & Hall, C. (2017). Changing views of teachers and teaching in Vietnam. Teaching Education, 28(3), 244–256.
Nguyen, M., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2012). Cooperative learning in Vietnam and the West-East educational transfer. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.685233.
Pham, H. M. (1998). Vietnam’s education: The current position and future prospects. Hanoi, VN: The Gioi Publishers.
Pond, E. (2014, Spring). Vietnam’s second revolution. World Policy Journal, 107–113.
Psacharopoulos, G., Rojas, C., & Velez, E. (1993). Achievement evaluation of Colombia’s “Escuela Nueva”: Is multigrade the answer? Comparative Education Review, 37(3), 263–276.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy analysis. In F. Rizvi & B. Lingard (Eds.), Globalizing education policy (pp. 44–70). New York: Routledge.
Robertson, S. L. (2005). Re-imagining and rescripting the future of education: Global knowledge economy discourses and the challenge to education systems. Comparative Education, 41(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500150922.
Saito, E., Tsukui, A., & Tanaka, Y. (2008). Problems on primary school-based in-service training in Vietnam: A case study of Bac Giang province. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.08.001.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Salomon, M., & Vu, K. D. (2007). Doi moi, education and identity formation in contemporary Vietnam. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 37(3), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920701330222.
Samoff, J. (2013). Institutionalizing international influence. In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (4th ed., pp. 55–88). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2006). In G. Steiner-Khamsi & I. Stolpe (Eds.), Educational import: Local encounters with global forces in Mongolia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending: Building comparative policy studies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 3–18). NY: New York.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2013). What is wrong with the “what-went-right” approach in educational policy? European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.20.
Stromquist, N. P. (1999). Conceptual and empirical issues in educational innovations. In N. P. Stromquist & M. L. Basile (Eds.), Politics of educational innovations in developing countries: An analysis of knowledge and power (pp. 3–20). New York: Falmer Press.
Tabulawa, R. (2003). International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique. Comparative Education, 39(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060302559.
Tikly, L. (2015). What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? Towards a critical realist understanding of learning in international and comparative education. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.008.
Tran, T. T. (2013). Limitation on the development of skills in higher education in Vietnam. Higher Education, 65(5), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9567-7.
Tran, L. T., & Marginson, S. (2014). Education for flexibility, practicality and mobility. In L. T. Tran, S. Marginson, H. Do, Q. Do, T. Le, N. Nguyen, et al. (Eds.), Higher education in Vietnam: Flexibility, mobility and practicality in the global knowledge economy (pp. 3–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vavrus, F., & Bartlett, L. (2012). Comparative pedagogies and epistemological diversity: Social and material contexts of teaching in Tanzania. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 634–658. https://doi.org/10.1086/667395.
Verger, A., Edwards, D. B., & Altinyelken, H. K. (2014). Learning from all? The World Bank, aid agencies and the construction of hegemony in education for development. Comparative Education, 50(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2014.918713.
Wolf, D. L. (1996). Situated feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1–55). New York: Routledge.
Woodside, A. (1991). The contributions to rural change of modern Vietnamese village schools. In C. F. Keyes (Ed.), Reshaping local worlds: Formal education and cultural change in rural Southeast Asia (pp. 174–199). New Haven: Yale University Press.
World Bank. (2015). Renovation of general education project: Project information document. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the constructive comments provided by Roseann Liu, Shervin Malekzadeh, and the editors and reviewers of this special issue to support this paper through its various iterations. This project was partially funded by Swarthmore College, PA, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Le, H.M. Another textbook project? The implementation of Escuela Nueva in Vietnam. Educ Res Policy Prac 17, 223–239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9230-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9230-x