Abstract
School accountability is such a familiar concept in many education systems that questions about what it actually means and entails are rather uncommon, especially to busy practitioners on the ground. This paper reports a research that examines each of the questions of what and to whom Singapore schools are accountable, from the point of practitioners holding leadership positions in Singapore schools. This research was a qualitative study with a sample of 36 vice-principals. This analysis was enriched and interpreted with a literature-based discussion, which pointed out the implications of the research findings. According to the findings, the participants felt that Singapore schools were accountable for students’ holistic development; site, funding and staff management; national survival and nation building; and humanity and the future. Singapore schools were accountable to students, parents, country and citizens, and themselves. Interestingly, for a system that was reputed for its academic achievement, none of the participants mentioned examination results directly but referred to the importance of holistic education. The findings also suggested an inseparability of the concepts ‘accountability’ and ‘responsibility’ in the participants’ minds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams J. E., Kirst M. (1999) New demands for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In: Murphey J., Louis K. S. (eds) Handbook of research in educational administration. (2nd ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 463–489
Barber M., Mourshed M. (2007) How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company, London
Carlson D. (2007) Focusing state educational accountability systems: Four methods of judging school quality and progress. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Dover
Constas M. A. (1992) Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal 29(2): 253–266
Darling-Hammond L., Ascher C. (1991) Creating accountability in big city school systems (Urban Diversity Series No. 102). ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, New York
Denzin N., Lincoln Y. (2000) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA
Goh, K. S., & Education Study Team. (1979). Report on the ministry of education 1978. Singapore: Singapore National Printers.
Hargreaves A. (2000) Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching 6(2): 151–182
Hargreaves A., Shirley D. (2009) The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Corwin, Thousand Oaks, CA
Levin H. M. (1974) A conceptual framework for accountability in education. The School Review 82(3): 363–391
Linn R. L. (2003) Accountability: responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher 32(7): 3–13
Ministry of Education. (1996). Singapore’s Achievement in The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Ministry of Education. Press Release, 15 November.
Ministry of Education: (2000a) The school excellence model: A guide. The School Appraisal Branch, Schools Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore
Ministry of Education. (2000b). Singapore Number One in Mathematics Again in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study 1999. Ministry of Education. Press Release, 28 November.
Ministry of Education. (2004). Singapore Tops the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003. Ministry of Education. Press Release, 16 December.
Ministry of Education. (2007). Singapore’s Performance in the Progress In International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2006. Ministry of Education. Press Release, 29 November.
Moller J. (2009) School leadership in the age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Journal in Education Change 10: 37–46
Mourshed M., Chijioke C., Barber M. (2010) How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey & Company, London
Ng P. T. (2003) The Singapore school and the school excellence model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2(1): 27–39
Ng P. T. (2005) Innovation and enterprise in Singapore schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 3(3): 183–198
Ng P. T. (2008a) Quality assurance in the Singapore education system: phases and paradoxes. Quality Assurance in Education 16(2): 112–125
Ng P. T. (2008b) Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 7(1): 5–15
Ng P. T. (2010) The evolution and nature of school accountability in the Singapore education system. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 22(4): 275–292
Ng P. T., Liang T. Y. (2005) Speaking the unspeakable: The Paper Dialogue approach. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management 5(2): 190–203
Normore A. H. (2004) The edge of chaos: School administration and accountability. Journal of Education Administration 42(1): 55–77
O’Day J. A. (2002) Complexity, accountability and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review 72(3): 293–329
O’Day J., Smith M. S. (1993) Systemic school reform and educational opportunity. In: Fuhrman S. H. (eds) Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 250–312
O’Reilly F. E. (1996) Educational accountability: Current practices and theories in use. Harvard University, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Cambridge
Ranson S. (2003) Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Educational Policy 18(5): 459–480
Stecher B. M., Kirby S. N. (2004) Organizational improvement and accountability: Lessons for education from other sectors. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica
Tan E. T. J. (2005) The marketization of education in Singapore: What does this mean for thinking schools, learning nation?. In: Tan E. T. J., Ng P. T. (eds) Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Prentice Hall, Singapore, pp 95–111
Teo, C. H. (2002). Closing Speech by Rear Admiral Teo Chee Hean, Minister for Education, on the Junior College/Upper Secondary Recommendations at Parliament, Singapore, 27 November.
Tharman, S. (2004). To Light a Fire: Enabling Teachers, Nurturing Students. Ministry of Education. Press Release, 29 September.
Wöbmann, L., Lüdemann, E., Schütz, G., & West, M. R. (2007). School accountability, autonomy, choice, and the level of student achievement: International evidence from PISA 2003 (OECD Education Working Papers, Number 13). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Directorate for Education.
Zeichner K. M., Liston D. P. (1996) Reflective teaching: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, P.T. An examination of school accountability from the perspective of Singapore school leaders. Educ Res Policy Prac 12, 121–131 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-012-9127-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-012-9127-z

