Correction: Erkenntnis

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00760-w

In this article, a few sentences were missed out by mistake.

1. In the sentence beginning ‘With this background in mind’ under the section ‘2 The Graded Obstruction Problem‘ the following lines were inadvertently removed and should have read

‘MODAL TIE: Count as relevant the realistic possible situations in which you try to F. The fallibility of your ability to F is the proportion of the relevant situations in which you do not F. If there are no relevant situations, you are totally unable to F.’

2. In the sentence beginning ‘Over the next three sections’ under the section ‘3 Fragility’ the following lines were inadvertently removed and should have read

‘FRAGILITY MIN: Take the fragility of your F-ing in each of the realistic possible situations in which you F. The fallibility of your ability to F is the lowest of these fragility values. If there are no realistic possible situations in which you F, you are totally unable to F.’

3. In the sentence beginning ‘Here is my account of fallibility again:’ under the section ‘5 A Fragility Based Account of Fallibility’ the following lines were inadvertently removed and should have read

‘FRAGILITY MIN: Take the fragility of your F-ing in each of the realistic possible situations in which you F. The fallibility of your ability to F is the lowest of these fragility values. If there are no realistic possible situations in which you F, you are totally unable to F.’

The original article has been corrected.