Skip to main content
Log in

William Bechtel and Linus Ta-Lun Huang, Philosophy of Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2022), 94 pp., $20.00 (Paperback)

  • Book review
  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This new monograph Philosophy of Neuroscience is a novel contribution to the relevant literatures. In this book review, I first summarise its contents, and then provide several critical points for the authors to consider. Even with these critical suggestions, the book is still highly recommended to those who work in philosophy of neuroscience, philosophy in neuroscience, neurophilosophy, philosophy of psychology, and cognitive sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Routledge.

  • Bennett, M., Dennett, D., Hacker, P., & Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and philosophy: Brain, mind, and language. Columbia University.

  • Bickle, J. (2009). The Oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. Oxford University Press.

  • Bickle, J., & Mandik, P. (1999). The Philosophy of Neuroscience. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  • Bickle, J., Mandik, P., & Landreth, A. (2019). The Philosophy of Neuroscience. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  • C Maxwell, J. (1868). On governors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 16, 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford University Press.

  • Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Little, Brown.

  • Egan, F. (2019). The nature and function of content in computational models. In M. Sprevak, & M. Colombo (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the computational mind. Routledge.

  • Haselager, W. F. G., de Groot, A., & Rappard, H. (2003). Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: A debate for the sake of appearance. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. (2012). The Pittsburgh school of philosophy: Sellars, McDowell, Brandom. Routledge.

  • Nagel, E. (1970). Issues in the logic of reductive explanations. In H. E. Kiefer, & K. M. Munitzred Mind, science, and history. SUNY.

  • Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds.), The foundations of science and the concept of psychology and psychoanalysis, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1). University of Minnesota.

  • Sneed, J. (1971). The logical structure of mathematical physics. D. Reidel.

  • Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, T. William Bechtel and Linus Ta-Lun Huang, Philosophy of Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2022), 94 pp., $20.00 (Paperback). Erkenn (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00793-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00793-9

Navigation