Abstract
This new monograph Philosophy of Neuroscience is a novel contribution to the relevant literatures. In this book review, I first summarise its contents, and then provide several critical points for the authors to consider. Even with these critical suggestions, the book is still highly recommended to those who work in philosophy of neuroscience, philosophy in neuroscience, neurophilosophy, philosophy of psychology, and cognitive sciences.
References
Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Routledge.
Bennett, M., Dennett, D., Hacker, P., & Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and philosophy: Brain, mind, and language. Columbia University.
Bickle, J. (2009). The Oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Bickle, J., & Mandik, P. (1999). The Philosophy of Neuroscience. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Bickle, J., Mandik, P., & Landreth, A. (2019). The Philosophy of Neuroscience. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
C Maxwell, J. (1868). On governors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 16, 270–283.
Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Little, Brown.
Egan, F. (2019). The nature and function of content in computational models. In M. Sprevak, & M. Colombo (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the computational mind. Routledge.
Haselager, W. F. G., de Groot, A., & Rappard, H. (2003). Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: A debate for the sake of appearance. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 5–23.
Maher, C. (2012). The Pittsburgh school of philosophy: Sellars, McDowell, Brandom. Routledge.
Nagel, E. (1970). Issues in the logic of reductive explanations. In H. E. Kiefer, & K. M. Munitzred Mind, science, and history. SUNY.
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds.), The foundations of science and the concept of psychology and psychoanalysis, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1). University of Minnesota.
Sneed, J. (1971). The logical structure of mathematical physics. D. Reidel.
Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615–628.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, T. William Bechtel and Linus Ta-Lun Huang, Philosophy of Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2022), 94 pp., $20.00 (Paperback). Erkenn (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00793-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00793-9