Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. London: Routledge.
Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (2010). Discovering complexity. Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boone, T. W., & Piccinini, G. (2016). Mechanistic abstraction. Philosophy of Science, 83, 1–13.
Brenner, S., Jacob, F., & Meselson, M. (1961). An unstable intermediate carrying information from genes to ribosomes for protein synthesis. Nature, 190, 576–581.
Bursten, J. (2018). Smaller than a breadbox. Scale and natural kinds. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 1–23.
Chang, H. (2014). Epistemic activities and systems of practice: Units of analysis in philosophy of science after the practice turn. In L. Soler, S. Zwart, M. Lynch, & V. Isreal-Jost (Eds.), Science after the practice turn in philosophy, history and social studies of science (pp. 67–79). London: Routledge.
Craver, C. (2003). The making of a memory mechanism. Journal of the History of Biology, 36, 153–195.
Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craver, C. (2014). The ontic account of scientific explanation. In M. Kaiser, O. Scholz, D. Plenge, & A. Hüttemann (Eds.), Explanation in the special sciences: The case of biology and history (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht: Springer.
Craver, C., & Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: discoveries across the life sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Craver, C., & Kaplan, D. (2018). Are more details better? On the norms of completeness for mechanistic explanations. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy015.
Darden, L., & Craver, C. (2002). Strategies in the interfield discovery of the mechanism of protein synthesis. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33, 1–28.
Dennett, D. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 88(1), 27–51.
Duhem, P. (1906/1954). The aim and structure of physical theory, trans. from La Théorie Physique: Son Objet et sa Structure (Paris: Marcel Riviera & Cie.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feest, U. (2011). Re-membering (short term) memory: Oscillations of an epistemic thing. Erkenntnis, 75(3), 391–411.
Feest, U. (2017). Phenomena and objects of research in the cognitive and behavioral sciences. Philosophy of Science, 84, 1165–1176.
Hacking, I. (1981). Do we see through a microscope? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62(4), 305–322.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Introductory topics in the philosophy of the natural sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halina, M. (2018). Mechanistic explanation and its limits. In S. Glennan & P. Illari (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy (pp. 213–224). London: Routledge.
Haueis, P. (2014). Meeting the brain on its own terms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00815.
Haueis, P. (2018). Meeting the brain on its own terms. Exploratory concept formation and noncognitive functions in neuroscience. Dissertation, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg.
Haugeland, J. (1998). Pattern and being. In Having thought. Essays in the metaphysics of mind (pp. 267–290). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haugeland, J. (2013). Dasein disclosed. In J. Rouse (Ed.), John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Illari, P. (2013). Integrating the ontic and epistemic. Erkenntnis, 78, 237–255.
Judson, H. F. (1996). The eighth day of creation: The makers of the revolution in biology (expanded edition). Cold Spring Harbour, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Kaiser, M., & Krickel, B. (2017). The metaphysics of constitutive mechanistic phenomena. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 68(3), 745–779.
Kaplan, D. M., & Craver, C. F. (2011). The explanatory force of dynamical and mathematical models in neuroscience: A mechanistic perspective. Philosophy of Science, 78(4), 601–627.
Kästner, L. (2015). Learning about constitutive relations. In U. Mäki, I. Votsis, S. Ruphy, & G. Schurz (Eds.), Recent developments in the philosophy of science: EPSA13 Helsinki. European studies in philosophy of science (pp. 155–167).
Kästner, L. (2017). Philosophy of cognitive neuroscience: Causal explanations, mechanisms & empirical manipulations. Berlin: Ontos/DeGruyter.
Kästner, L. (2018). Integrating mechanistic explanations through epistemic perspectives. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 68, 68–79.
Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go. Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Machamer, P., Craver, C., & Darden, L. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.
Noumura, M., Hall, B. D., & Spiegelman, S. (1960). Characterization of RNA synthesized in Escherichia coli after bacteriophage T2 infection. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2, 306–326.
Pardee, A. B., Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1959). The genetic control and cytoplasmic expression of ‘inducibility’ in the synthesis of beta-galatosidase. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1, 165–178.
Potochnik, A., & McGill, B. (2012). The limitations of hierarchical organization. Philosophy of Science, 79, 120–140.
Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Rouse, J. (2015a). Articulating the world. Conceptual understanding and the scientific image. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rouse, J. (2015b). Mechanisms as modal patterns. In Manuscript presented at “patterns in science” workshop, Dec 3–4, 2015. Berlin School of Mind and Brain.
Sheredos, B. (2016). Re-reconciling the epistemic and ontic views of explanation (or, why the ontic view cannot support norms of generality). Erkenntnis, 81, 919–949.
Van Fraasen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wallace, D. (2003). Everett and structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, 87–105.
Watson, J. D. (1965). Molecular biology of the gene. New York: W. A. Benjamin.
Wimsatt, W. (1981). Robustness, reliability and overdetermination. In M. Brewer & B. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry in the social sciences (a festschrift for Donald T. Campbell) (pp. 123–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wright, C. (2012). Mechanistic explanation without the ontic conception. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2(3), 375–394.