Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. M. (2014). The ‘unreliability’ of epistemic intuitions. In E. Machery & E. O’Neill (Eds.), Current controversies in experimental philosophy (pp. 128–145). New York: Routledge.
Anderson, E. (1995). Knowledge, human interests, and objectivity in feminist epistemology. Philosophical Topics, 23(2), 27–58.
Armstrong, J. S. (1978). Long range forecasting: From crystal ball to computer. New York: Wiley.
Bach, T. (2012). Analogical cognition: Applications in epistemology and the philosophy of mind and language. Philosophy Compass, 7(5), 348–360.
Bach, T. (2014). A unified account of general learning mechanisms and theory-of-mind development. Mind and Language, 29(3), 351–381.
Bilalić, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Inflexibility of experts—Reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters. Cognitive Psychology, 56(2), 73–102.
Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2001). Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals. Memory and Cognition, 29(5), 730–735.
Camerer, C. F., & Johnson, E. J. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can experts know so much and predict so badly? In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 195–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, J. S., Winer, R. L., Coates, D., Galegher, J., & Alibrio, J. J. (1982). Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. Law and Society Review, 17, 199–228.
Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147–1156.
Chalmers, D. J., French, R. M., & Hofstadter, D. R. (1992). High-level perception, representation, and analogy: A critique of artificial intelligence methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 4(3), 185–211.
Chi, M., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
Christie, S., & Gentner, D. (2010). Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 356–373.
Clarke, S. (2013). Intuitions as evidence, philosophical expertise and the developmental challenge. Philosophical Papers, 42(2), 175–207.
Clement, J. (1982). Analogical reasoning patterns in expert problem solving. In Proceedings of the fourth meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 79–81). Ann Arbor, MI.
Clement, J. (1986). Methods for evaluating the validity of hypothesized analogies. In Proceedings of the eighth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 223–234). Amherst, MA, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist, 26, 180–188.
Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34(7), 57–582.
Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built upon myth. New York: The Free Press.
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1993). Statistical prediction versus clinical prediction: Improving what works. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 351–367). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Devitt, M. (2012). Whither experimental semantics? Theoria, 72, 5–36.
Devitt, M. (2015). Testing theories of reference. In J. Haukioja (Ed.), Advances in experimental philosophy of language (pp. 31–63). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Dretske, F. I. (1991). Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge: MIT press.
Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Expert measurement and mechanical combination. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7(1), 86–106.
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fodor, J. (1980). Fixation of belief and concept acquisition. In M. Piatelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1994). MAC⁄ FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141–205.
Garb, H. N. (1989). Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 387–396.
Gendler, T. S. (1998). Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, 397–424.
Gendler, T. S. (2004). Thought experiments rethought—And reperceived. Philosophy of Science, 71, 1152–1163.
Gendler, T. S. (2007). Philosophical thought experiments, intuitions, and cognitive equilibrium. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 68–89.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Gentner, D. (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp. 195–236). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gentner, D., & Colhoun, J. (2010). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In A. von Müller, E. Pöppel, B. Glatzeder, & V. Goel (Eds.), On thinking. Towards a theory of thinking (Vol. 2). Berlin: Springer.
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Forbus, K. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science, 3, 1343–1382.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horvath, J. (2010). How (not) to react to experimental philosophy. Philosophical Psychology, 23, 447–480.
Johnson, E. J. (1988). Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process. In R. Glaser, T. H. C. Michelene, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 209–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.
Klein, G. A. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge: MIT press.
Kornblith, H. (1998). The role of intuition in philosophical inquiry: An account with no unnatural ingredients. In M. DePaul & F. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 129–142). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67(6), 2797–2822.
Lowe, E. J. (2002). A survey of metaphysics (Vol. 15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 586–597.
Machery, E. (2017). Philosophy within its proper bounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martí, G. (2012). Empirical data and the theory of reference. In W. P. Kabasenche, M. O’Rourke, & M. H. Slater (Eds.), Reference and referring: Topics in contemporary philosophy (pp. 63–82). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical vs. statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Millikan, R. G. (1996). On swampkinds. Mind and Language, 11(1), 103–117.
Neander, K. (1996). Swampman meets swampcow. Mind and Language, 11(1), 118–129.
Nersessian, N. (1993). In the theoretician’s laboratory: Thought experiments as mental modeling. In Proceedings from the philosophy of science association, (pp. 291–301).
Nolan, D. (2015). The a posteriori armchair. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(2), 211–231.
Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510–520.
Papineau, D. (1996). Doubtful intuitions. Mind and Language, 11(1), 130–132.
Paul, L. A. (2012). Metaphysics as modeling: The handmaiden’s tale. Philosophical Studies, 160(1), 1–29.
Reiss, J., & Kitcher, P. (2009). Biomedical research, neglected diseases, and well-ordered science. THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 24(3), 263–282.
Ryberg, J. (2013). Moral intuitions and the expertise defence. Analysis, 73(1), 3–9.
Saariluoma, P. (1990). Apperception and restructuring in chess players’ problem solving. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. Keana, R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.), Lines of thinking: Reflections on the psychology of thought (Vol. 2, pp. 41–57). Oxford: Wileys.
Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. Psychological bulletin, 66(3), 178–200.
Shafto, P., & Coley, J. D. (2003). Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: Novices to experts, naive similarity to ecological knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 641–649.
Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 252–266.
Sober, E. (2000). Psychological egoism. The blackwell guide to ethical theory (pp. 129–148). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1999). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior (No. 218). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Sorensen, R. A. (1992). Thought experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sosa, E. (2007). Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition. Philosophical Studies, 132(1), 99–107.
Stich, S. (2007). Evolution, altruism and cognitive architecture: A critique of Sober and Wilson’s argument for psychological altruism. Biology and Philosophy, 22(2), 267–281.
Swoyer, C. (1999). Explanation and inference in metaphysics. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23, 100–131.
Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can I know?. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(3), 435–467.
Weinberg, J. M. (2007). On how to challenge intuitions empirically without risking scepticism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 318–343.
Weinberg, J. M., Gonnerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters? Philosophical Psychology, 23, 331–355.
Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Williamson, T. (2011). Philosophical expertise and the burden of proof. Metaphilosophy, 42, 215–229.