Skip to main content
Log in

The Reality of Field’s Epistemological Challenge to Platonism

Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the introduction to his Realism, mathematics and modality (1989), and in earlier papers included in that collection, Hartry Field offered an epistemological challenge to platonism in the philosophy of mathematics. Justin Clarke-Doane (in: Fabrice Pataut (ed.) Truth, objects, infinity: New perspectives on the philosophy of Paul Benacerraf, 2016) argues that Field’s challenge is an illusion: it does not pose a genuine problem for platonism. My aim is to show that Clarke-Doane’s argument relies on a misunderstanding of Field’s challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Justin Clarke-Doane for discussion of an earlier draft; and anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Liggins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liggins, D. The Reality of Field’s Epistemological Challenge to Platonism. Erkenn 83, 1027–1031 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9925-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9925-z

Navigation