Erkenntnis

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 481–510 | Cite as

Structural Realism for Secondary Qualities

Original Article

Abstract

This paper outlines and defends a novel position in the color realism debate, namely structural realism. This position is novel in that it dissociates the veridicality of color attributions from the claim that physical objects are themselves colored. Thus, it is realist about color in both the semantic and epistemic senses, but not the ontic sense. The generality of this position is demonstrated by applying it to other “secondary qualities,” including heat, musical pitch, and odor. The basic argument proceeds by analogy with the theory of measurement. I argue that perceptual experiences are analogous to numerical structures in that they are suitable for measurement, but only report measured values after they have been linked to states of a measurement device via calibration. Since the calibration of our sensory apparatus varies with context, it is inappropriate to identify specific experiences with specific properties in the world. Rather, it is structural relations between possible experiences which represent relations between possible external properties, and it is at the level of these structural relationships that veridicality is appropriately assessed.

References

  1. Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Byrne, A. & Hilbert, D. R. (2003a). Color realism and color science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 3–21.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, A. & Hilbert, D. R. (2003b). Color realism redux. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 52–63.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, A. & Hilbert, D. R. (1997). Introduction. In A. Byrne & D. R. Hilbert (Eds.), Readings on color, volume 1: The philosophy of color. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. (1993). A simple view of colour. In J. Haldane & C. Wright (Eds.), Reality, representation, and projection (pp. 257–268). New York, NY: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  6. Cartlidge, E. (2012). Loose cable may unravel faster-than-light result. Science, 335, 1027–1028.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. New York, NY: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Churchland, P. (2007). On the reality (and diversity) of objective colors: How color-qualia space is a map of reflectance-profile space. Philosophy of Science, 74, 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dravnieks, A. (1985). Atlas of odor character profiles. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM.Google Scholar
  10. Fairchild, M. D. (2005). Color appearance models (2nd ed.) Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Frigerio, A., Giordani, A., & Mari, L. (2010). Outline of a general model of measurement. Synthese, 175, 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  13. Hardin, C. L. (1988). Color for philosophers: Unweaving the rainbow. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  14. Harper, R., Bate Smith, E. C., & Land, D. G. (1968). Odour description and odour classification. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
  15. Hatfield, G. (2003). Objectivity and subjectivity revisited: Color as a psychobiological property. In R. Mausfeld, & D. Heyer (Eds.), Colour perception: Mind and the physical world (pp. 187–202). Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatfield, G. (2007). The reality of qualia. Erkenntnis, 66, 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Isaac, A. M. C. (2013). Quantifying the subjective: Psychophysics and the geometry of color. Philosophical Psychology, 26, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston, M. (1992). How to speak of the colors. Philosophical Studies, 68, 221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar
  20. Koulakov, A. A., Kolterman, B. E., Enikolopov, A. G., & Rinberg, D. (2011). In search of the structure of human olfactory space. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 5, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement (Vol. 1). Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  22. Kuehni, R. G. & Hardin, C. L. (2010). Churchland’s metamers. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuehni, R. G. & Schwarz, A. (2008). Color ordered: A survey of color order systems from antiquity to the present. New York, NY: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladyman, J. (1998). What is structural realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29, 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement (Vol. 3). Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  26. Macdonald, M. K. (1922). An experimental study of Henning’s system of olfactory qualities. The American Journal of Psychology, 33, 535–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacLeod, D. (2003). Phenomenology and mechanism. In R. Mausfeld & D. Heyer (Eds.) Colour perception: Mind and the physical world (pp. 431–434). Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  28. Maloney, L. T. (1986). Evaluation of linear models of surface spectral reflectance with small numbers of parameters. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 3, 1673–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matthen, M. (2005). Seeing, doing, and knowing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthen, M. (2010). Color experience: A semantic theory. In J. Cohen & M. Matthen (Eds.), Color ontology and color science (pp. 67–89). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mausfeld, R. (2002). The physicalist trap in perception theory. In D. Heyer & R. Mausfeld (Eds.), Perception in the physical world (pp. 75–112). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Mausfeld, R. (2003). ‘Colour’ as part of the format of different perceptual primitives: The dual coding of colour. In R. Mausfeld & D. Heyer (Eds.), Colour perception: mind and the physical world (pp. 381–430). Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore, B. C. J. (2008). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (5th ed.). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  34. Müller, I. & Weiss, W. (2005). Entropy and energy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Nassau, K. (2001). The physics and chemistry of color (2nd ed). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Shepard, R. N. (1982). Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89, 305–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shepard, R. N. (1992). The perceptual organization of colors: An adaptation to regularities of the terrestrial world? In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 492–532). New York, NY: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, G. E. (2001). J. J. Thomson and the electron, 1897–1899. In J. Z. Buchwald, & A. Warwick (Eds.), Histories of the electron (pp. 21–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.Google Scholar
  42. Teller, D. Y. (2003). Color: A vision scientist’s perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 48–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tolliver, J. T. (1994). Interior colors. Philosophical Topics, 22, 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tye, M. (2006). The puzzle of true blue. Analysis, 66.3, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Fraassen, B. (2008). Scientific representation. New York, NY: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wandell, B. A. (1989). Color constancy and the natural image. Physica Scripta, 39, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wandell, B. A. (1995). Foundations of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  48. Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds. Dialectica, 43, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright, W. (2010). Perception, color, and realism. Erkenntnis, 73, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao, H., Ivic, L., Otaki, J. M., Hashimoto, M., Mikoshiba, K., & Firestein, S. (1998). Functional expression of a mammalian odorant receptor. Science, 279, 237–242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations