de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability. New York: Wiley.
Duhem, P. (1954 ). The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Duhem, P. (1991). German science: Some reflections on German science: German science and German virtues (John Lyon, Trans.). La Salle, IL: Open Court (First published 1915).
Duhem, P. (1996 ). Physics and metaphysics. In R. Ariew & P. Barker (Eds.), Pierre Duhem: Essays in the history and philosophy of science (pp. 29–50). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Fairweather, A. (2011). The epistemic value of good sense. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 43(1), 139–146.
Gillies, D. (2000). Philosophical theories of probability. Routledge: Psychology Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ivanova, M. (2010). Pierre Duhem’s good sense as a guide to theory choice. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,
Ivanova, M. (2011). ‘Good sense’ in context: A response to kidd. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 42(4), 610–612.
Ivanova, M. (forthcming). Is there place for epistemic virtues in theory choice? In A. Fairweather (Ed.), Virtue Scientia: Bridges between virtue epistemology and philosophy of science. Synthese Library, Dordrecht: Springer.
Joyce, J. (2009). The development of subjective Bayesianism. In D. Gabbay, S. Hartmann S., & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic (Vol. 10). Inductive Logic.
Kidd, I. J. (2011). Pierre Duhem’s epistemic aims and the intellectual virtue of humility: A reply to Ivanova. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science (electronic version).
Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. (Ed.). (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The essential tension: Selected studies in the scientific tradition and change (pp. 320–353). The University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). history of science and its rational reconstructions. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Martin, R. N. D. (1991). Pierre Duhem: Philosophy and history in the work of a believing physicist. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mongin, P. (2009). Duhemian themes in expected utility theory. In A. Brenner & J. Gayon (Eds.), French studies in the philosophy of science. Berlin: Springer.
Strevens, M. (2003). The role of the priority rule in science. The Journal of Philosophy,
Stump, D. (2007). Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
Stump, D. (2011). The scientist as impartial judge: Moral values in Duhem’s philosophy of science. New perspectives on Pierre Duhem’s. The aim and structure of physical theory (book symposium) Metascience,