, Volume 78, Issue 5, pp 971–975

Throwing Darts, Time, and the Infinite

Original Paper


In this paper, I present a puzzle involving special relativity and the random selection of real numbers. In a manner to be specified, darts thrown later hit reals further into a fixed well-ordering than darts thrown earlier. Special relativity is then invoked to create a puzzle. I consider four ways of responding to this puzzle which, I suggest, fail. I then propose a resolution to the puzzle, which relies on the distinction between the potential infinite and the actual infinite. I suggest that certain structures, such as a well-ordering of the reals, or the natural numbers, are examples of the potential infinite, whereas infinite integers in a nonstandard model of arithmetic are examples of the actual infinite.


  1. Brown, J. R. (2004). Peeking into Plato’s Heaven. Philosophy of Science, 71, 1126–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freiling, C. (1986). Axioms of symmetry: Throwing darts at the real number line. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 51, 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gwiazda, J. (2006). The train paradox. Philosophia, 34, 437–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gwiazda, J. (2012a). A proof of the impossibility of completing infinitely many tasks. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 93, 1–7.Google Scholar
  5. Gwiazda, J. (2012b). On infinite number and distance. Constructivist Foundations, 7, 126–130.Google Scholar
  6. Hallett, M. (1988). Cantorian set theory and limitation of size. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Moore, A. W. (2001). The infinite (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Norton, J. (2004). On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument? Philosophy of Science, 71, 1139–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Thomson, J. F. (1954). Tasks and super-tasks. Analysis, 15, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyLehman CollegeBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations