Advertisement

Erkenntnis

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 31–49 | Cite as

A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Baldwin Effect

  • Graciela Kuechle
  • Diego RiosEmail author
Original Article
  • 249 Downloads

Abstract

The Baldwin effect is a process by which learnt traits become gradually incorporated into the genome through a Darwinian mechanism. From its inception, the Baldwin effect has been regarded with skepticism. The objective of this paper is to relativize this assessment. Our contribution is two-fold. To begin with, we provide a taxonomy of the different arguments that have been advocated in its defense, and distinguish between three justificatory dimensions—feasibility, explanatory relevance and likelihood—that have been unduly conflated. Second, we sharpen the debate by providing an evolutionary game theoretic perspective that is able to generalize previous results. The upshot of this paper is that the mechanism envisaged by Baldwin is less puzzling than commonly thought.

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Social Learning Asymptotic Stability Evolutionary Stability Replicator Dynamic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We had the opportunity to discuss some of the issues explored in this paper with different scholars in congresses and seminars. We would like to thank Pablo Abitbol, Nicolas Claidière Till Grüne-Yanoff, Tommi Kokkonen, Jaakko Kuorikoski, Jason Alexander Mackenzie, David Papineau, Dan Sperber, and Petri Ylikoski as well as two reviewers of Erkenntnis for their stimulating objections and comments. None of them should be held responsible for the ideas advocated here.

References

  1. Alexander, J. M., & Skyrms, B. (1999). Bargaining with neighbours: Is justice contagious? Journal of Philosophy, 96, 588–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ancel, L. (1999). A quantitative model of the Simpson-Baldwin effect. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 19(6), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ancel, L. (2000). Undermining the Baldwin expediting effect: Does phenotypic plasticity accelerate evolution? Theoretical Population Biology, 58, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avital, E., & Jablonka, E. (2000). Animal traditions: Behavioral inheritance in evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin, J. (1896). A new factor in evolution. The American Naturalist, 30, 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  7. Dawkins, R. (1996). Climbing mount improbable. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Dupre, J. (2000). In defense of the Baldwin effect: A reply to Watkins. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(3), 477–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewer, R. (1956). Imprinting in animal behaviour. Nature, 177, 227–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foster, D. P., & Young, P. H. (1990). Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology, 38, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1996). Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Between Baldwin Skepticism and Baldwin Boosterism. In B. Weber & D. Depew (Eds.), Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, P. (2003). Beyond the Baldwin effect: James Mark Baldwin’s social heredity, epigenetic inheritance and Niche-construction. In B. Weber & D. Depew (Eds.), Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths, P. (2006). The Baldwin effect and genetic assimilation: Contrasting explanatory foci and gene concepts in two approaches to an evolutionary process. In Carruthers, Laurence, & Stich (Eds.), The Innate mind II: Culture and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Huttegger, S. (2010). Generic properties of evolutionary games and adaptationism. The Journal of Philosophy, 107, 80–102.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lorenz, K. (1965). Evolution and the modification of behaviour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mayley, G. (1996). Landscapes, learning costs, and genetic assimilation. Evolutionary Computation, 4, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature cxlvi , 15–18.Google Scholar
  22. Papineau, D. (2005). Social learning and the Baldwin effect. In Zilhao, A. (Ed.), Evolution, rationality and cognition: A cognitive science for the twenty-first century. Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed Human evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sober, E. (1994). From a biological point of view: Essays in evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suzuki, R., & Arita, T. (2008). How learning can guide the evolution of communication. Proceedings of Artificial Life, XI, 608–615.Google Scholar
  26. Suzuki, R., Arita, T., & Watanabe, Y (2008). Language, evolution and the Baldwin effect. Artificial Life and Robotics, XII (1) 65–69.Google Scholar
  27. Watkins, J. (1999). A note on Baldwin effect. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weibull, J. W. (1995). Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Zollman, K. (2005). Talking to neighbors: The evolution of regional meaning. Philosophy of Science, 72, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zollman, K., & Smead, R. (2009). Plasticity and language: An example of the Baldwin effect? Working paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Witten Herdecke UniversityWittenGermany

Personalised recommendations