Causal and Constitutive Relations, and the Squaring of Coleman’s Diagram: Reply to Vromen

Abstract

We respond to Jack Vromen’s (this issue) critique of our discussion of the missing micro-foundations of work on routines and capabilities in economics and management research. Contrary to Vromen, we argue that (1) inter-level relations can be causal, and that inter-level causal relations may also obtain between routines and actions and interactions; (2) there are no macro-level causal mechanisms; and (3) on certain readings of the notion of routines and capabilities, these may be macro causes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    We might note in passing that condition (b), separate identifiability, is often violated in the routines literature where X and Y, or the micro and the macro, are conflated with such constructs as “structuration” (cf. Feldman and Pentland 2003).

  2. 2.

    Note that it is standard practice in hierarchical model building to do this. For example, the literature on endogenous and exogenous social interactions claims to provide estimates of statistically significant causal relations (e.g., Manski 1993; Durlauf and Young 2001).

References

  1. Abell, P. M., Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2008). Building microfoundations for the routines, capabilities and performance link. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, M. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 643–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Durlauf, S., & Young, H. P. (Eds.). (2001). Social dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manski, C. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schelling, T. C. (1998). Social mechanisms and social dynamics. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vromen, J. (2010). Micro-foundations for strategic management: Squaring coleman’s diagram. Erkenntnis (this issue).

  13. Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12, 730–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Abell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abell, P., Felin, T. & Foss, N. Causal and Constitutive Relations, and the Squaring of Coleman’s Diagram: Reply to Vromen. Erkenn 73, 385–391 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9238-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Constitutive Relation
  • Causal Relation
  • Strategic Management
  • Macro Level
  • Organizational Routine