Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental impact assessment of earthquake-generated construction and demolition waste management: a life cycle perspective in Turkey

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction and demolition waste consists of residue and discarded materials that result from construction, renovation, remodelling, and demolition activities. This waste typically includes various materials, such as concrete, wood, steel, bricks, drywall, asphalt, glass, plastics, and other construction-related materials. This research quantified the environmental consequences of managing earthquake-generated construction and demolition waste in Turkey using diverse techniques. The study employed a life cycle assessment to compute these impacts. First, the impacts of the currently used landfill process were calculated and then a scenario in which concrete is reused, recyclable wastes are separated and recycled, and the remaining waste is sent to a landfill was created. According to the findings, it is seen that if all the debris is sent to a landfill, 11.9 t CO2eq will be generated in the short term, while 18,428.3 t CO2eq can be saved, especially by reusing concrete. These findings may vary due to the involvement of different unforeseen processes, but they show that although it is often very difficult to utilize such wastes, especially those generated as a result of unusual disasters, such as earthquakes, very significant environmental gains can be achieved through appropriate treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alhamlawi F, Alaifan B, Azar E (2021) A comprehensive assessment of Dubai’s green building rating system: Al Sa’fat. Energy Policy 157:112503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhawat M, Ashour A, Yildirim G, Aldemir A, Sahmaran M (2022) Properties of geopolymers sourced from construction and demolition waste: a review. J Build Eng 50:104104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banias GF, Karkanias C, Batsioula M, Melas LD, Malamakis AE, Geroliolios D, Spiliotis X (2022) Environmental assessment of alternative strategies for the management of construction and demolition waste: a life cycle approach. Sustainability 14(15):9674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonifazi G, Serranti S, Trotta O (2021) Hyperspectral imaging approach for the identification of construction and demolition waste from earthquake sites. SPIE Future Sens. Technol. 2021(11914):353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghi G, Pantini S, Rigamonti L (2018) Life cycle assessment of non-hazardous construction and demolition waste (CDW) management in Lombardy region (Italy). J Clean Prod 184:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bribián IZ, Capilla AV, Usón AA (2011) Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46(5):1133–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng B, Huang J, Li J, Chen S, Chen H (2022) Improving contractors’ participation of resource utilisation in construction and demolition waste through government incentives and punishments. Environ Manag 70(4):666–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard A, Lodato C, Butera S, Fruergaard TA, Kamps M, Corbin L, Tonini D, Astrup TF (2022) Background data collection and life cycle assessment for construction and demolition waste (CDW) management, Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/772724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelsen CJ, van der Sloot HA, Petkovic G (2017) Long-term leaching from recycled concrete aggregates applied as sub-base material in road construction. Sci Total Environ 577–578:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferronato N, Moresco L, Guisbert Lizarazu GE, Gorritty Portillo MA, Conti F, Torretta V (2021) Comparison of environmental impacts related to municipal solid waste and construction and demolition waste management and recycling in a Latin American developing city. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:8548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galán B, Viguri JR, Cifrian E, Dosal E, Andres A (2019) Influence of input streams on the construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling performance of basic and advanced treatment plants. J Clean Prod 236:117523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedik A (2020) A review on the evaluation of the potential utilisation of construction and demolition waste in hot mix asphalt pavements. Resour Conserv Recycl 161:104956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Zhu J, Wu X, Qiu R, Xu Z, Ruan J (2021) Eddy current separation can be used in separation of non-ferrous particles from crushed waste printed circuit boards. J Clean Prod 312:127755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Alimi W, Assaggaf R, Salami BA, Oladapo EA (2023) An overview of factors influencing the properties of concrete incorporating construction and demolition wastes. Constr Build Mater 367:130307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam R, Nazifa TH, Yuniarto A, Uddin AS, Salmiati S, Shahid S (2019) An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling. Waste Manag 95:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner MD, Kurth MH, Pumo I, Linkov I (2021) Recovery-based design of buildings for seismic resilience. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 65:102556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabirifar K, Mojtahedi M, Wang CC (2020) A conceptual foundation for effective construction and demolition waste management. Clean Eng Technol 1:100019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaza S, Yao L, Bhada-Tata P, Van Woerden F (2018) What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth MH, Keenan JM, Sasani M, Linkov I (2019) Defining resilience for the US building industry. Build Res Inform 47(4):480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederer J, Gassner A, Kleemann F, Fellner J (2020) Potentials for a circular economy of mineral construction materials and demolition waste in urban areas: a case study from Vienna. Resour Conserv Recycl 161:104942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liikanen M, Grönman K, Deviatkin I, Havukainen J, Hyvärinen M, Kärki T, Horttanainen M (2019) Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites–assessment of environmental impacts. J Clean Prod 225:716–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinho AJC, Couto J, Camões A (2022) Current state, comprehensive analysis and proposals on the practice of construction and demolition waste reuse and recycling in Portugal. J Civ Eng Manag 28(3):232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oluleye BI, Chan DW, Saka AB, Olawumi TO (2022) Circular economy research on building construction and demolition waste: a global review of current trends and future research directions. J Clean Prod 357:131927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao L, Tang Y, Li Y, Liu M, Yuan X, Wang Q, Ma Q (2022) Life cycle assessment of three typical recycled products from construction and demolition waste. J Clean Prod 376:134139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Cotte EH, Fuentes L, Martinez-Arguelles G, Quintana HAR, Walubita LF, Cantero-Durango JM (2020) Influence of recycled concrete aggregates from different sources in hot mix asphalt design. Constr Build Mater 259:120427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos RP, Tubino R (2021) Potential evaluation of the use of construction and demolition waste (CDW) in the recovery of degraded soils by mining in Brazil. Resources Conserv Recycl Adv 12:200060

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva RV, De Brito J, Dhir RK (2017) Availability and processing of recycled aggregates within the construction and demolition supply chain: a review. J Clean Prod 143:598–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucan M, Alyamac KE (2022) A holistic assessment of the use of emerging recycled concrete aggregates after a destructive earthquake: mechanical, economic and environmental. Waste Manag 146:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Véliz K, Walters J, Busco C, Vargas M (2023) Modeling barriers to a circular economy for construction demolition waste in the Aysén region of Chile. Resources Conserv Recycl Adv 18:200145

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira DR, Calmon JL, Coelho FZ (2016) Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 124:656–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Xia J, Thompson JR, Flower RJ (2017) Urban construction and demolition waste and landfill failure in Shenzhen, China. Waste Manag 63:393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yay ASE (2015) Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. J Clean Prod 94:284–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazgan O, Ozturkoglu Y, Ozkan-Ozen YD (2023) Construction and demolition waste management in Urban transformation: a case study for performance evaluation. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol 14(1):121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Hu M, Di Maio F, Sprecher B, Yang X, Tukker A (2022) An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analysing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe. Sci Total Environ 803:149892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors thank Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University for supporting to buy the licensed version of SimaPro 9.3.0.2 software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by AYÇ and LB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levent Bilgili.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilgili, L., Çetinkaya, A.Y. Environmental impact assessment of earthquake-generated construction and demolition waste management: a life cycle perspective in Turkey. Environ Syst Decis 44, 424–432 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-023-09947-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-023-09947-6

Keywords

Navigation