Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of environmental performance on competitiveness and innovation: a stochastic frontier approach for Colombia

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main sources of input for an economy are environmental and natural resources, especially in biodiverse countries. Given this, such resources are associated with competitiveness and efficiency in that natural resources are a factor for production that affects productivity and growth. Moreover, changes resulting from natural resources becoming scarcer must be anticipated to prevent a decrease in competitiveness. Within this context, analysing competitiveness and its relationship to environmental performance is critical, especially for emerging economies with high levels of biodiversity, as a means to promote environmental care, prevent environmental damage and to improve competitiveness. This study evaluates the effects of environmental performance on competitiveness by applying a stochastic frontier approach, the World Economic Forum’s global competitiveness index and various environmental variables, and in turn, it elucidates how environmental performance affects competitiveness in Colombian regions, which are characterized by economic and social disparities. The results of this study highlight the importance of environmental performance on increasing competitiveness. Improved environmental performance should lead to an increase in competitiveness. It is important to mitigate regional disparities through the use of political instruments that promote adequate environmental measures and that consider competitiveness and innovation to promote sustainable development and the responsible use of natural resources. The findings of this study will be critical to the design of adequate instruments that consider environmental performance and competitiveness as key elements in promoting sustainability, growth and welfare in Colombian regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Pinterest

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and the data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Agovino M, Matricano D, Garofalo A (2020) Waste management and competitiveness of firms in Europe: a stochastic frontier approach. Waste Manage 102:528–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altomonte C, Gábor B (eds) (2016) Measuring competitiveness in Europe: resource allocation, granularity and trade, Bruegel Blueprint Series, vol XVIV. Bruegel, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzaabi H, Marni N, Huda M (2020) Investigating risk management in municipalities in United Arab Emirates (UAE): An empirical research. J Crit Rev 7(7):70–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo de Souza T, da Cunha M (2018) Performance of Brazilian total factor productivity from 2004 to 2014: a sectoral and regional analysis. J Econ Struct 7:24

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Robles M, Alarcón S (2021) Economic efficiency of Colombian agricultural companies: an empirical study of stochastic production frontiers. DYNA 88(216):48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellesi F, Lehrer D, Tal A (2005) Comparative advantage: the impact of ISO 14001 environmental certification on exports. Environ Sci Technol 39(7):1943–1953

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti I, Branca G, Zucaro R (2019) Evaluating input use efficiency in agriculture through a stochastic frontier production: an application on a case study in Apulia (Italy). J Clean Prod 236:117609

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergbrant M, Hunter D, Kelly P (2018) Rivals’ competitive activities, capital constraints, and firm growth. J Bank Finance 97:87–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau D, Fontagne L, Martin P (2013) Energy and Competitiveness, Notes du conseil d’analyse économique. https://doi.org/10.3917/ncae.006.0001; https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-notes-duconseil-d-analyse-economique-2013-6-page-1.htm

  • Bruyn S, Markowska A, de Jong F, Blom M (2009) Resource productivity, competitiveness and environmental policies Delft. CE Delft, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiazza R, Richardson A, Audretsch D (2015) Knowledge effects on competitiveness: from firms to regional advantage. J Technol Transfer 40:899–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos J (2019) Background analytical study. Forests, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and employment. https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/UNFF14-BkgdStudy-SDG8-March2019.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2020

  • Chen Y, Pai L (2019) Determining the relationship between ownership and technical efficiency by using a dynamic stochastic production frontier approach. J Air Transp Manage 75:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X, Long R, Chen H, Li W (2018) Green competitiveness evaluation of provinces in China based on correlation analysis and fuzzy rough set. Ecol Ind 85:841–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan G, Crotti R, Drzeniek M, Serin C, (2014) Assessing progress towards sustainable competitiveness. The global competitiveness report. World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2014-15/GCR_Chapter1.2_2014–15.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

  • Cotte Poveda A, Jimenez CC (2019) Effects of expenditures in science, technology and R&D on technical change in countries in Latin America and the caribbean. In: Pardo MC, Cotte PA, Fletscher Moreno S (eds) Analysis of science, technology, and innovation in emerging economies. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. J Prod Anal 24:93–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-005-3042-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despotovic D, Cvetanovic S, Nedic V, Despotovic M (2019) Social aspects of sustainable competitiveness in the selected european countries in the period 2012–2015. Soc Indic Res 141:841–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimopoulos T, Sacchetto S (2016) Technological heterogeneity and corporate investment. J Econ Dyn Control 66:20–35

    Google Scholar 

  • ECDPM (2015) European report on development, combining finance and policies to implement a transformative post-2015 development agenda. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2015-European-Report-on-Development-English.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2020

  • Esty D, Charnovitz S (2011) Environmental sustainability and competitiveness: policy imperative and corporate opportunity. Working paper. https://www.hbs.edu/competitiveness/Documents/USComp-EstyCharnovitz-WorkingPaper.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2020

  • Esty C, Charnovitz S (2013) Environmental sustainability and competitiveness: policy imperative and corporate opportunity, report. https://www.hbs.edu/competitiveness/Documents/uscomp-estycharnovitz-workingpaper.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2020

  • Fagerberg J, Srholec M, Knell M (2007) The competitiveness of nations: why some countries prosper while others fall behind. World Dev 35(10):1595–1620

    Google Scholar 

  • Falciola J, Jansen M, Rollo V (2020) Defining firm competitiveness: a multidimensional framework. World Dev 129:104857

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2009) National competitiveness index of the forest products industry in the Asia- pacific region. http://www.fao.org/3/a-am620e.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2020

  • Ferronato N, Torretta V (2019) Waste mismanagement in developing countries: a review of global issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(6):1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flachenecker F, Kornejew M (2018) The causal impact of material productivity on microeconomic competitiveness and environmental performance in the European Union. Environ Econ Policy Stud 21:87–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez G, Fa M, Pasola J (2003) Using environmental management systems to increase firms’ competitiveness. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 10(2):101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta N, Yadav KK, Kumar V (2015) A review on current status of municipal solid waste management in India. J Environ Sci (china) 37:206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadj T (2020) Effects of corporate social responsibility towards stakeholders and environmental management on responsible innovation and competitiveness. J Cleaner Prod 250:119490

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins R, Izushi H (2011) Competition, competitive advantage, and clusters: the ideas of michael porter. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins R, Izushi H (2015) The competitive advantage of nations: origins and journey. Compet Rev 25:458–470

    Google Scholar 

  • IDB (2014) Sustainable infrastructure for competitiveness and inclusive growth. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Sustainable-infrastructure-for-competitiveness-and-inclusive-growth.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2020

  • Jia F, Ma X, Xu X, Xie L (2020) The differential role of manufacturing and non-manufacturing TFP growth in economic growth. Struct Change Econ Dyn 52:174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabak O, Onsel S, Ulengin E (2019) Analyzing two-way interaction between the competitiveness and logistics performance of countries. Transp Policy 98:238–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen T, Kuosmanen N (2009) Role of benchmark technology in sustainable value analysis. An application to Finnish dairy farms. Agric Food Sci 18:302–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Le V, Vu X, Nghiem S (2018) Technical efficiency of small and medium manufacturing firms in Vietnam: a stochastic meta-frontier analysis. Econ Anal Policy 59:84–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Llorca M, Baños J, Somoza J, Arbués P (2017) A stochastic frontier analysis approach for estimating energy demand and efficiency in the transport sector of Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy J. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.5.mllo

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Gamero M, Molina-Azorin M (2016) Environmental management and firm competitiveness: the joint analysis of external and internal elements. Long Range Plan 49(6):746–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Luadicina P (2005) Managing global risk to seize competitive advantage. Ivey Bus J. https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/managing-global-risk-to-seize-competitive-advantage/. Accessed 24 Apr 2020

  • Mckinsey Global Institute (2010) How to compete and grow: a sector guide to policy, report. www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/how-to-compete-and-grow. Accessed 11 Feb 2020

  • Martinkus B, Lukasevicius K (2008) Investment environment of Lithuanian resorts: researching national and local factors in the Palanga case. Transform Bus Econ 7(2):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur K, Berwa A (2017) Sustainable competitiveness: redefining the future with technology and innovation. J Sustain Finance Invest 7(3):290–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo-Becerra L, Orozco-Gallo J (2015) Technical efficiency for Colombian small crop and livestock farmers: a stochastic metafrontier approach for different production systems. Borradores De Economía 47:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo-Becerra L, Ramos-Forero J, Hernandez-Santamaria PL (2017) Educación superior en Colombia: situación actual y análisis de eficiencia. Desarrollo y Sociedad 78:59–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales Sarriera J, Araya G, Serebrisky T, Briceño-Garmendía C, Schwartz J (2013) Benchmarking container port technical efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean: a stochastic frontier analysis. Policy research working paper; no. 6680. World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Moreno B, García-Álvarez M, Ramos C, Fernández-Vázquez E (2014) A general maximum entropy econometric approach to model industrial electricity prices in Spain: a challenge for the competitiveness. Appl Energy 135:815–824

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) The economic significance of natural resources: key points for reformers in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, report. http://www.oecd.org/env/outreach/2011_AB_Economic%20significance%20of%20NR%20in%20EECCA_ENG.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2020

  • OECD (2019) Regional competitiveness. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/regionalcompetitiveness.htm. Accessed 25 Jan 2020

  • Oh H, Seo D, Kim J, Yoo S, Seong H (2015) Assessment and evaluation of national human resource development system competitiveness in emerging countries. Asia Pac Educ Rev 16:477–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Orea L, Wall A (2016) Measuring eco-efficiency using the stochastic frontier analysis approach. In: Aparicio J, Lovell C, Pastor J (eds) Advances in efficiency and productivity. International series in operations research & management science, vol 249. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Palei T (2015) Assessing the impact of infrastructure on economic growth and global competitiveness. Proced Econ Finance 23:168–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo F, Aguado A, Pino M (2019) Holistic model to analyze and prioritize urban sustainable buildings for public services. Sustain Cities Soc 44:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter CF, Kumbhakar SC (2014) Efficiency analysis: a primer on recent advances. Found Trends® Econom 7(3–4):191–385. https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reig P, Shiao T, Gassert F (2013) Aqueduct water risk framework. Working paper. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-waterrisk-framework. Accessed 5 May 2020

  • Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (2008) On competition, updated and Expanded. Harvard Business School Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Private Competitiveness Council, University of El Rosario (2019) Competitiveness Index for Colombian Departments. https://compite.com.co/indice-departamental-de-competitividad/

  • Rivers N (2010) Impacts of climate policy on the competitiveness of Canadian industry: how big and how to mitigate? Energy Econom 32:1092–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeidi P, Saeidi S, Sofian S, Saeidi P, Nilashi M, Mardani A (2019) The impact of enterprise risk management on competitive advantage by moderating role of information technology. Comput Stand Interface 63:67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Snieska V, Bruneckiene J (2015) Measurement of lithuanian regions by regional competitiveness index. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 1:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekathen M, Dechow N (2013) Enterprise risk management and continuous re-alignment in the pursuit of accountability: a German case. Manage Acc Res 24(2):100–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Timko J, Le Billion P, Zerriffi H, Honey-Rosés J, la Roche I, Gaston C, Sunderland T, Akozak R (2018) A policy nexus approach to forests and the SDGs: tradeoffs and synergies. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 34:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE and FAO (2009) The forest sector in the green economy. Geneva timber and forest discussion paper 54. United Nations. Geneva. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/807DP-54.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2020

  • Vaninsky A (2010) Interstate comparison of environmental performance using stochastic frontier analysis: the united states case study. Int J Soc Behav Educ Econ Bus Ind Eng 66:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitorino de Souza Melaré A, Melaré A, Montenegro GS, Faceli K, Casadei V (2017) Technologies and decision support systems to aid solid-waste management: a systematic review. Waste Manage 59:567–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (2016) What is competitiveness? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/09/what-is-competitiveness/. Accessed 10 Jan 2020

  • WEF (2019) Global competitiveness report. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2019. Accessed 1 Feb 2020

  • World Bank (2020) Sustainable infrastructure. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31290

  • Yale (2020) Environmental performance index. https://epi.yale.edu/downloads/epi2020report20210112.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2020

  • Zaidi S, Wei Z, Gedikli A, Zafar M, Hou F, Iftikhar Y (2019) The impact of globalization, natural resources abundance, and human capital on financial development: Evidence from thirty-one OECD countries. Resour Policy 64:101476

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Administration, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia

    Clara Inés Pardo Martínez

  2. Department of Economics, Universidad Santo Tomas, Bogotá, Colombia

    Alexander Cotte Poveda

Authors
  1. Clara Inés Pardo Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Cotte Poveda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CIPM: conceived and designed analysis, wrote the paper, and performed analysis. AC: contributed data or analysis tools, performed analysis, and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clara Inés Pardo Martínez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Intellectual property

We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In doing so we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors. We confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all named authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez, C.I.P., Poveda, A.C. The effects of environmental performance on competitiveness and innovation: a stochastic frontier approach for Colombia. Environ Syst Decis 42, 51–62 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09828-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09828-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation