Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emerging mercury mitigation solutions for artisanal small-scale gold mining communities evaluated through a multicriteria decision analysis approach

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 June 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Over 15 million people are involved in artisanal small-scale gold mining (ASGM) globally. Often, ASGM includes smelters that use mercury to extract gold. If mishandled, these actions may cause adverse health effects for smelters and their surrounding communities. There are multiple tools to reduce health risks while maintaining a sustainable economic profit, but each method has trade-offs, such as cost, efficiency, and potential health impacts that are not widely understood. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a powerful tool in assessing multiple perspectives and factors that affect stakeholder decisions and can be used to inform smelters and community members on reducing exposure to mercury. Here, MCDA was used to determine the ranks of alternatives to reduce exposure to mercury based on socio-economic, ecological, and human health criteria. Stochastic processes were used to evaluate 12 alternatives, including mitigation strategies (i.e., chelation therapy techniques, retorts, water filters) as well as mercury-free mining substitutes. In this model, the borax method ranked first 72% of the time, followed by the gravity method (19%), a multicapture system retort (7%), and low-cost retorts (≤ 1%). While MCDA is an excellent tool, results tend to be generalized across a heterogenous landscape. More localized factors such as incorrect soil chemistry could cause performance challenges for options like mercury-free mining substitutes. To aid more localized decision-making, a decision tree model was developed to aid stakeholders to explore which alternatives are suitable based on context-specific factors using “Take-the-best” decision heuristics. This work can assist researchers and stakeholders involved with ASGM to identify which options are scalable for their region as well as to mitigate adverse effects of exposure to mercury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Change history

References

  • Acemoglu D, García-Jimeno C, Robinson JA (2012) Finding Eldorado: slavery and long-run development in Colombia. J Comp Econ 40(4):534–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre-Salado CA et al (2017) Improving identification of areas for ecological restoration for conservation by integrating USLE and MCDA in a gis-environment: a pilot study in a priority region northern Mexico. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6(9):262

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoah N, Stemn E (2018) Siting a centralised processing centre for artisanal and small-scale mining—a spatial multi-criteria approach. J Sustain Min 17(4):215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos VA, Manariotis ID, Karapanagioti HK, Chrysikopoulos CV (2012) Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions by malt spent rootlets. Chem Eng J 213:135–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appel PWU, Jøsson JB (2010) Borax—an alternative to mercury for gold extraction by small-scale miners: introducing the method in Tanzania. Geol Survey Denmark Greenland Bull 20:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel PWU, Na-Oy LD (2014) Mercury-free gold extraction using borax for small-scale gold miners. J Environ Prot. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2014.56052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argonne National Laboratory (2013) Manual for the construction of a mercury capture system for use in. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont

    Google Scholar 

  • Associates, Bluedot. “Supporting EIA Decision-Making: An Environmental Impact Assessment.” http://bluedotassociates.com/downloads/EIA_Calculator_Read_Me.pdf

  • Basri MS, Sera K (2017) Current mercury exposure from artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Bombana, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia-future significant health risks. Toxics 5(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu A et al (2015) Identification of response options to artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) in Ghana via the delphi process. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(9):11345–11363

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry MJ, Ralston NVC (2008) Mercury toxicity and the mitigating role of selenium. EcoHealth 5(4):456–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancur-Corredor B, Loaiza-Usuga JC, Denich M, Borgemeister C (2018) Gold mining as a potential driver of development in Colombia: challenges and opportunities. J Clean Prod 199:538–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose-O’Reilly S et al (2016) A Preliminary study on health effects in villagers exposed to mercury in a small-scale artisanal gold mining area in Indonesia. Environ Res 149:274–281

    Google Scholar 

  • CAFTA DR (2011) EIA Technical Review Guideline : Non ‐ Metal and Metal Mining Volume I Part 2 Example Terms of Reference. I. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-04/documents/miningvol1.pdf

  • Castilhos Z et al (2015) Human exposure and risk assessment associated with mercury contamination in artisanal gold mining areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(15):11255–11264

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cegan JC, Filion AM, Keisler JM, Linkov I (2017) Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review. Environ Syst Decisions 37(2):123–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C et al (2006) The roles of serum selenium and selenoproteins on mercury toxicity in environmental and occupational exposure. Environ Health Perspect 114(2):297–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chien LC et al (2006) Analysis of the health risk of exposure to breast milk mercury in infants in Taiwan. Chemosphere 64(1):79–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordy P et al (2011) Mercury contamination from artisanal gold mining in antioquia, Colombia: the World’s highest per capita mercury pollution. Sci Total Environ 410:154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • CRC (2017) Technical report protection and surveillance. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • den Broeder L et al (2017) Community participation in health impact assessment. A scoping review of the literature. Environ Impact Assess Rev 66:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagles-Smith CA, Silbergeld EK, Basu N, Bustamante P, Diaz-Barriga F, Hopkins WA, Kidd KA, Nyland JF (2018) Modulators of mercury risk to wildlife and humans in the context of rapid global change. Ambio 47(2):170–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Esdaile LJ, Chalker JM (2018) The mercury problem in artisanal and small-scale gold mining. Chem A Eur J 4(27):6905–6916

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J (2003) Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox GA, Muñoz-Carpena R, Sabbagh GJ (2010) Influence of flow concentration on parameter importance and prediction uncertainty of pesticide trapping by vegetative filter strips. J Hydrol 384(1–2):164–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García O et al (2015) Artisanal gold mining in antioquia, colombia: a successful case of mercury reduction. J Clean Prod 90:244–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychol Rev 103(4):650

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB et al (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101316v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güiza L, Aristizábal JD (2013) Mercury and gold mining in Colombia: a failed state. Universitas Scientiarum 18(1):33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Vidyarthi SR, Sankararamakrishnan N (2014) Thiol functionalized sugarcane bagasse—a low cost adsorbent for mercury remediation from compact fluorescent bulbs and contaminated water streams. J Environ Chem Eng 2(3):1378–1385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins DL, Gogal RM, Tuberville TD (2019) Snakes as novel biomarkers of mercury contamination: a review. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 249:133–152

    Google Scholar 

  • He L, Shen J, Zhang Y (2018) Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management. J Environ Manag 206:1115–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (HC) (2010) Guidance on peer review of human health risk assessments for federal contaminates sites in Canada, Version 2.0. Health Canada, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel T, Felix H, Michael P (2003) Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining—Challenges and Opportunities. Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki

  • Hinton JJ, Veiga MM, Veiga ATC (2003) Clean artisanal gold mining: a utopian approach. J Clean Prod 11(2):99–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RW (1984) The ecological significance of sulfur in the energy dynamics of salt marsh and coastal marine sediments. Biogeochemistry 1:5–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui LL et al (2016) Impact of fetal and childhood mercury exposure on immune status in children. Environ Res 144:66–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Idrobo N, Daniel M, Ana MT (2014) Illegal gold mining and violence in Colombia. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy. 20(1):83–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones N, McGinlay J, Dimitrakopoulos PG (2017) Improving social impact assessment of protected areas: a review of the literature and directions for future research. Environ Impact Assess Rev 64:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CH et al (2019) A new framework for small drinking water plant sustainability support and decision-making. Sci Total Environ 695:133899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jønsson B, Jesper EC, Kalvig P (2013) Toxic mercury versus appropriate technology: artisanal gold miners’ retort aversion. Resour Policy 38(1):60–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen BB (1977) The sulfur cycle of a coastal marine sediment (Limfjorden, Denmark). Limnol Oceanogr 22(5):814–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovel E, Abramowski Z, Pakalnis E, Marshall B, Veiga M (2018) Mercury (II) binding activity of vegetable and fruit juices: identifying potential detoxifying juices for the citizens of Portovelo-Zaruma, Ecuador. Asp Min Miner Sci 2(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RE, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York/Chichester/Brisbane/Toronto/Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer AM, Drace K, Seney CS, Veiga MM (2015) Challenges associated with using retorts to limit mercury exposure in artisanal and small-scale gold mining: case studies from Mozambique, Ecuador, and Guyana. ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 51–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker GA et al (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1(2):95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Kim J (2008) Integrating comparative risk assessment with multi-criteria decision analysis to manage contaminated sediments: an example for the New York/New Jersey Harbor. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 14(3):495–511

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch AM et al (2020) Potential health effects of cyanide use in artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Burkina Faso. J Clean Prod 252:119689

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Køster-Rasmussen R et al (2016) Mercury pollution from small-scale gold mining can be stopped by implementing the gravity-borax method—a two-year follow-up study from two mining communities in the Philippines. New Solut 25(4):567–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen AKB, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen S (2014) A review of mercury exposure among artisanal small-scale gold miners in developing countries. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87(6):579–590

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1998) SMAA - Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis. Eur J Op Res 106(1):137–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YF et al (2012) Organic selenium supplementation increases mercury excretion and decreases oxidative damage in long-term mercury-exposed residents from Wanshan, China. Environ Sci Technol 46(20):11313–11318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I et al (2005) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a framework for managing contaminated sediments. Strategic management of marine ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 271–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbub KR, Krishnan K, Naidu R, Andrews S, Megharaj M (2017) Mercury toxicity to terrestrial biota. Ecol Ind 74:451–462

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini L, Sala S (2018) Social impact assessment in the mining sector: review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resour Policy 57:98–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Miserendino RA et al (2013) Challenges to measuring, monitoring, and addressing the cumulative impacts of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in ecuador. Resour Policy 38(4):713–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreda-Piñeiro J et al (2011) In-vivo and in-vitro testing to assess the bioaccessibility and the bioavailability of arsenic, selenium and mercury species in food samples. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30(2):324–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Calderón A, Tong TS, Thokala P (2019) Multi-criteria decision analysis software in healthcare priority setting: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics 38(3):269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00863-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RK (2012) Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Apprais 30(1):5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan VL et al (2020) Modeling exposure risk and prevention of mercury in drinking water for artisanal-small scale gold mining communities. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1855576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Faircheallaigh C (2010) Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environ Impact Assess Rev 30(1):19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofosu G, Dittmann A, Sarpong D, Botchie D (2020) Socio-economic and environmental implications of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) on agriculture and livelihoods. Environ Sci Policy 106:210–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okul D, Gencer C, Aydogan EK (2014) A method based on SMAA-topsis for stochastic multi-criteria decision making and a real-world application. Int J Inf Technol Decision Mak 13(05):957–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivero-Verbel J et al (2016) human exposure and risk assessment associated with mercury pollution in the Caqueta River, Colombian Amazon. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(20):20761–20771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OPIC. 2011. “Chapter 7—environmental impact assessment.” Overseas Private Investment Corporation. https://www3.opic.gov/environment/eia/greenfields/Chapter7-EnvironmentalImpactAssessment.pdf

  • Ouma DH, Ting Z, Pesha JC (2017) Analysis of the socio-economic factors that contribute to children school dropout in artisanal small-scale gold mining communities of Tanzania. J Educ Pract 8(14):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelissari R et al (2019) SMAA methods and their applications: a literature review and future research directions. Ann Op Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03151-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petcher S, Parker DJ, Hasell T (2019) Macroporous sulfur polymers from a sodium chloride porogen—a low cost, versatile remediation material. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 5(12):2142–2149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raab M, Gigerenzer G (2015) The power of simplicity: a fast-and-frugal heuristics approach to performance science. Front Psychol 6:1672

    Google Scholar 

  • Riaz A, Khan S, Muhammad S, Shah MT (2019) Mercury contamination in water and sediments and the associated health risk: a case study of artisanal gold-mining. Mine Water Environ 38(4):847–854

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-Camacho C et al (2017) Dietary human exposure to mercury in two artisanal small-scale gold mining communities of northwestern Colombia. Environ Int 107:47–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seccatore J et al (2014) An estimation of the artisanal small-scale production of gold in the world. Sci Total Environ 496:662–667

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinan Erzurumlu S, Erzurumlu YO (2015) Sustainable mining development with community using design thinking and multi-criteria decision analysis. Resour Policy 46:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Specht D, Ros-Tonen MAF (2017) Gold, power, protest: digital and social media and protests against large-scale mining projects in Colombia. New Media Soc 19(12):1907–1926

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller HA (2018) Rethinking mercury: the role of selenium in the pathophysiology of mercury toxicity. Clin Toxicol 56(5):313–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steckling N et al (2017) Global burden of disease of mercury used in artisanal small-scale gold mining. Ann Global Health 83(2):234–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundseth K et al (2017) Global sources and pathways of mercury in the context of human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(1):105

    Google Scholar 

  • Telmer KH, Veiga MM (2009) World emissions of mercury from artisanal and small scale gold mining. Mercury fate and transport in the global atmosphere: emissions, measurements and models. Springer, Boston, pp 131–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Tervonen T (2014) JSMAA: open source software for SMAA computations. Int J Syst Sci 45(1):69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (2013) Mercury Convention. Minamata convention of mercury. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2014a) EIA Technical Review Guideline: Non‐Metal and Metal Mining. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-04/documents/miningvol1.pdf. Accessed on 15 Feb, 2021

  • US EPA (2014b) “Technical Support Document EPA’s 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment.” https://www.epa.gov/national-air-toxics-assessment/nata-glossary-terms#hq

  • Veiga MM, Marshall BG (2019) The Colombian artisanal mining sector: formalization is a heavy burden. Extr Ind Soc 6(1):223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga MM, Angeloci-Santos G, Meech JA (2014) Review of barriers to reduce mercury use in artisanal gold mining. Extr Ind Soc 1(2):351–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga MM et al (2018) An affordable solution for micro-miners in colombia to process gold ores without mercury. J Clean Prod 205:995–1005

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vélez-Torres I, Vanegas DC, McLamore ES, Hurtado D (2018) Mercury pollution and artisanal gold mining in Alto Cauca, Colombia: woman’s perception of health and environmental impacts. J Environ Dev 27(4):415–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn C, Hill E (2003) Mercury retorts for the processing of precious metals and hazardous wastes. JOM 55(4):45–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhouse C et al (2020) A population-based mercury exposure assessment near an artisanal and small-scale gold mining site in the Peruvian Amazon. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 31:126–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney MC, Cristol DA (2017) Impacts of sublethal mercury exposure on birds: a detailed review. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 244:113–163

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. 2017. Mercury and health. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mercury-and-health

  • Williams ML, Ertas A, Tate D (2014) Using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis in biologically inspired design as a multidisciplinary tool to assess biology-to-engineering transfer risk for candidate analog. J Mech Design Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington MJH et al (2017) Laying waste to mercury: inexpensive sorbents made from sulfur and recycled cooking oils. Chem A Eur J 23(64):16219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zolnikov TR (2017) My failed attempt to gain access to small-scale gold miners. Am J Pub Health 107(4):507

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Irene Vélez-Torres (Universidad del Valle) for her direct guidance, advice, intermediation with ASGM communities in Cauca, Colombia, coordination of field visits and other activities. The authors are also appreciative of the community of Yolombo (Cauca-Colombia), and the Community Council of La Toma for their trust and generosity in sharing their knowledge and experiences with us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois, Champaign, USA

    V. L. Morgan

  2. Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA

    E. S. McLamore, M. Correll & G. A. Kiker

Authors
  1. V. L. Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. S. McLamore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Correll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. A. Kiker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. A. Kiker.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, V.L., McLamore, E.S., Correll, M. et al. Emerging mercury mitigation solutions for artisanal small-scale gold mining communities evaluated through a multicriteria decision analysis approach. Environ Syst Decis 41, 413–424 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09808-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09808-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation