Some U.S. cities are excellent for cycling, like Portland, and some cities are not so good. This observation raises the question: what are the characteristics of a city that make it good for cycling? This study investigates the characteristics of 119 cities to explore what factors help make a city good for cycling. What “good” means in terms of cycling cities is subjective and we use the popular Bicycling Magazine ranking of cities for this purpose. We collected a variety of data sources about our cities including geographic, meteorology, and socioeconomic data. These data were used to conduct cluster analyses and create multivariate generalized linear regression models. We hypothesized that geographic and meteorology factors were important in determining good cycling cities. However, our hypothesis was proved wrong because socio-economic factors, like house pricing and obesity rates, play a more important role. For example, hilly cities, like San Francisco, can have excellent cycling infrastructure. The analysis shows what cities are like each other, regarding our considered characteristics; thus, city planners might wish to look at similar cities to help determine forecasts of expected use and public benefit of cycling. We use a case study of the Hampton Roads region of Virginia to show the application of our regression models.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bicycling Magazine (2017) The 50 best bike cities of 2016. https://www.bicycling.com/culture/news/the-50-best-bike-cities-of-2016. Accessed 25 May 2017
BikesForPeople (2019) City ratings. https://cityratings.peopleforbikes.org/. Accessed 16 Aug 2019
Breakaway Now Research Group (2015) U.S. Bicycling participation benchmarking study report, pp 1–64
City of Norfolk (2014) City of Norfolk bicycle and pedestrian strategic plan, pp 1–158
Clark SS, Seager TP, Chester MV (2018) A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure. Environ Syst Decis 38(3):339–352
Community Cycling Center (2012) Understanding barriers to bicycling project. Community Cycling Center, Portland
Elton-Walters J, Wynn N (2017) 17 best cycling apps: iPhone and Android tools for cyclists. https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/product-news/best-cycling-apps-143222. Accessed 9 June 9, 2017
Everitt BS, Dunn G (2010) Applied multivariate data analysis. Wiley, New York
Ferguson K (2008) The destructive impact of mountain biking on forested landscapes. Environmentalist 28(2):67–68
Geelong Planning Committee (1978) Geelong Bikeplan. Geelong Planning Committee, Geelong
Harkey D, Reinfurt D, Knuiman M (1998) Development of the bicycle compatibility index. Transp Res Rec 1636:13–20
Jackson M, Ruehr E (1998) Let the people be heard: San Diego County Bicycle use and attitude survey. Transp Res Rec 1636:8–12
Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (2009) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York
Marqués R, Hernández-Herrador V, Calvo-Salazar M, García-Cebrián J (2015) How infrastructure can promote cycling in cities: lessons from Seville. Res Transp Econ 53:31–44
McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Wiley, New York
Meletiou M, Lawrie J, Cook T, Obrien S, Guenther J (2005) Economic impact of investments in bicycle facilities: case study of North Carolina's Northern Outer Banks. Transp Res Rec 1939:15–21
Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Collier CW, Johnson D, Schmid TL, Weather RD (2005) Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transp Res Part D 10(3):245–261
Parkin J, Wardman M, Page M (2008) Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation 35(1):93–109
Pierce J, Kolden CA (2015) The Hilliness of US Cities. Geogr Rev 105(4):581–600
Pucher J, Buehler R (2016) Safer cycling through improved infrastructure. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Pucher J, Dill J, Handy S (2010) Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev Med 50:S106–S125
Pucher J, Buehler R, Merom D, Bauman A (2011) Walking and cycling in the United States, 2001–2009: evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys. Am J Public Health 101(S1):S310–S317
Rousseeuw PJ (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 20:53–65
Schoner JE, Levinson DM (2014) The missing link: Bicycle infrastructure networks and ridership in 74 US cities. Transportation 41(6):1187–1204
Sears J, Flynn B, Aultman-Hall L, Dana G (2012) To bike or not to bike. Transp Res Rec 2314:105–111
Sener I, Eluru N, Bhat C (2009) Who are bicyclists? Why and how much are they bicycling?". Transp Res Rec 2134:63–72
Sorton AA, Walsh T (1998) Bicycle stress level as a tool to evaluate urban and suburban bicycle compatibility. Transp Res Rec 1438:17–24
Statistica (2017) Number of cities, towns and villages (incorporated places) in the United States in 2015, by population size. https://www.statista.com/statistics/241695/number-of-us-cities-towns-villages-by-population-size/. Accessed 25 May 2017
Thorndike RL (1953) Who belongs in the family? Psychometrika 18(4):267–276
Tukey JW (1980) We need both exploratory and confirmatory. Am Stat 34(1):23–25
Your Weather Service (2017) U.S. Climate data. www.usclimatedata.com. Accessed 9 June 2017
About this article
Cite this article
Collins, A.J., Jordan, C.A., Robinson, R.M. et al. Exploring good cycling cities using multivariate statistics. Environ Syst Decis 40, 526–543 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09753-z
- City planning
- Cluster analysis
- Multivariate regression