Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

In silico macro-imagineering of Salton Sea alternative futures under climate uncertainty and water transfer considerations

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present research was to simulate the Salton Sea elevation, volume, and total dissolved solids (TDS) to assess 34 different scenarios through the year 2024 in order to better evaluate the effects of potential water management scenarios. Parameterization of an existing Salton Sea simulation model, i.e., Salton Sea Stochastic Simulation Model (S4M), was performed to account for either an increase (+), decrease (−), or no change in precipitation (Pi), evapotranspiration (Eto), and river flow volume (Ri) in the Salton Sea Basin while simultaneously implementing two different water management policies: (1) water transfers to the Salton Sea end after 2017 (based on the Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA)) or (2) water transfers to the Salton Sea at 2017 levels continue into the future. The S4M is formulated as a compartment model based on difference equations with a daily time step using STELLA® 8.0 software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni multiple post hoc statistical tests were performed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics v. 22.0 with α (Type I error) = 0.05. A significant difference existed between the Baseline scenario with water transfers ending in 2017, i.e., − 241 feet above sea level (fasl) and about 69,000 ppm TDS, and the scenario with continued water transfers at 2017 levels, i.e., year 2024 end simulation of − 236.95 fasl and 61,000 ppm TDS. The results indicate that in order to improve conditions for fish and keep salinity ≤ 50,000 ppm, continued QSA water transfers cannot achieve such a result alone, ceteris paribus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alzaaq M (2017) The optimal location for the Salton Sea pipelines. Noor Publishing, San Bernardino

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnum DA, Bradley T, Cohen M, Wilcox B, Yanega G (2017) State of the Salton Sea—Amscience and monitoring meeting of scientists for the Salton Sea: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1005, p 20. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171005. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  • Cantrell B, Martin LJ, Ellis EC (2017) Designing autonomy: opportunities for new wildness in the anthropocene. Trends Ecol Evol 32:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart RB (2013) Macro-imagineering a ‘Fifth Coast’ USA: Salton Sea megaport and seawater canal. In: White MR (ed) Seawater: geochemistry, composition and environmental impacts. Noor Publishing, San Bernardino

    Google Scholar 

  • Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and San Diego County Water Authority (2002) Program environmental impact report for the implementation of the Colorado River quantification settlement agreement: State Clearinghouse no. 2000061034, v. I and II

  • Cohen MJ, Hyun KH (2006) HAZARD—the future of the Salton Sea with no restoration project. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado River Board of California (1992) Report to the California Legislature on the Current Condition of the Salton Sea and the Potential Impacts of Water Transfers. http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/salton/PotentialImpactsSaltonSea.html. Accessed 18 Dec 17

  • Delfino K (2006) Salton Sea restoration: can there be salvation for the Sea? 19 Pac.McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 157

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2015) ArcGIS ArcMap™ v. 10.3.1 [Software]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Freden M (2017) Crisis? How is that a crisis!? Contrib Hist Concept 12:12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frie AL, Dingle JH, Ying SC, Bahreini R (2017) The effect of a receding Saline Lake (The Salton Sea) on Airborne particulate matter composition. Environ Sci Technol 51:8283–8292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holdren GC, Montaño A (2002) Chemical and physical characteristics of the Salton Sea. California Hydrobiol 473:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IBM® SPSS® Statistics v. 22.0, SPSS, Chicago, Ill, USA (2013)

  • ISEE Systems (2006) STELLA 8.0 software. Lebanon, New Hampshire

  • Kjelland ME (2008) The future of the salton sea under proposed lower colorado river basin water management scenarios [Ph.D. dissertation], Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University

  • Kjelland ME, Swannack TM (2018) Salton Sea days of future past: modeling impacts of alternative water transfer scenarios on fish and bird population dynamics. Ecol Inform 43:124–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjelland ME, Swannack TM, Grant WE (2014) A system dynamics approach to modeling future climate scenarios: quantifying and projecting patterns of evapotranspiration and precipitation in the Salton Sea Watershed. Adv Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/135012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley-Garcia J, Dios FMD de, Villa LMO (2015) Spatial dimension of urban hazardscape perception: the case of Mexicali, Mexico. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlands Institute, University of Redlands (2004) Salton Sea Digital Atlas. Redlands, California. http://www.spatial.redlands.edu/salton/

  • Rudy AP (January 2005) Imperial contradictions: is the Valley a watershed, region, or cyborg? J Rural Stud 21:19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder RA, Orem WH, Kharaka YK (2002) Chemical evolution of the Salton Sea, California: nutrient and selenium dynamics. Hydrobiologia 473:23–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwabe KA, Schuhmann PW, Baerenklau KA, Nergis N (2008) Fundamentals of estimating the net benefits of ecosystem preservation: the case of the Salton Sea. Hydrobiologia 604(1):181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Ting M, Li C et al (2012) Projections of declining surface-water availability for the southwestern United States. Nat Clim Change 3:482–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Lis N, Feldman J, Ting M, Williams P, Nakamura J, Liu H, Henderson N (2018) Whither the 100th meridian? The once and future physical and human geography of America’s arid-humid divide. Part I: the story so far. Earth Interact 22:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Taira T, Nayak A, Brenguier F, Manga M (2018) Monitoring reservoir response to earthquakes and fluid extraction, Salton Sea geothermal field, California. Sci Adv 4:e1701536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) (2011) Salton Sea species conservation habitat project, Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report No. SPL-2010-00142-LLC, State Clearinghouse No. 2010061062, Prepared for the California Natural Resources Agency by the Department of Water Resources and Department of Fish and Game. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Application

  • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (2003) Salton Sea study status report. U.S. Department of the Interior, Lower Colorado Region, Boulder City, NV, pp 1–28

  • U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (2012) Reclamation managing water in the west: Colorado River Basin water supply and demand study. Executive summary, p 28

  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2017) National Water Information System: Web Interface.http://waterdata.usgs.gov/ca/nwis/uv?site_no=10254005. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  • Zelenko M (2018) As California’s largest lake dries up, it threatens nearby communities with clouds of toxic dust. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/6/17433294/salton-sea-crisis-drying-up-asthma-toxic-dust-pictures?silverid=NDA4MDY5MTkxODMwS0. Accessed 05 July 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Craig Forster and Brian Durham for their contributions.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Laboratory, Wetlands & Coastal Ecology Branch, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS, 39180, USA

    Michael E. Kjelland & Todd M. Swannack

  2. Mayville State University, Mayville, ND, 58257, USA

    Michael E. Kjelland

  3. Conservation, Genetics & Biotech, LLC, Valley City, ND, 58072, USA

    Michael E. Kjelland

  4. Geographos, Burbank, CA, 91506, USA

    Richard B. Cathcart

  5. Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA

    Todd M. Swannack

Authors
  1. Michael E. Kjelland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard B. Cathcart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Todd M. Swannack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Kjelland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kjelland, M.E., Cathcart, R.B. & Swannack, T.M. In silico macro-imagineering of Salton Sea alternative futures under climate uncertainty and water transfer considerations. Environ Syst Decis 39, 409–418 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09719-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09719-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation