Abstract
As a consequence of the U.S. effort to increase infrastructure security and resilience, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other U.S. federal agencies have identified 16 critical infrastructure sectors that are considered vital to the nation’s well-being in terms of economic security, public health, and safety. However, there remains no articulated set of values that justify this particular list of infrastructure systems or how decision-makers might prioritize investments towards one critical sector over another during a crisis. To offer a more integrated and holistic approach to critical infrastructure resilience, this research employs the capabilities approach to human development, which offers an alternative view of critical infrastructure that focuses on the services that infrastructure provides rather than its physical condition or vulnerability to threats. This service-based perspective of infrastructure emphasizes the role of infrastructure in enabling and supporting central human capabilities that build adaptive capacity and improve human well-being. We argue that the most critical infrastructure systems are those that are essential for providing and/or supporting central human capabilities. This paper examines the DHS designation of criticality from a capabilities perspective and argues for a capabilities basis for making distinctions between those systems that should be considered most critical and those that might be temporarily sacrificed. A key implication of this work is that an across sector approach is required to reorganize existing critical infrastructure efforts around the most valuable infrastructure end-services.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alderson DL, Doyle JC (2010) Contrasting views of complexity and their implications for network-centric infrastructures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 40(4):839–852
Aldrich DP, Meyer MA (2015) Social capital and community resilience. Am Behav Sci 59(2):254–269
Aldrich DP, Sawada Y (2015) The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami. Soc Sci Med 124:66–75
Alkire S (2002) Dimensions of human development. World Dev 30(2):181–205
Beitz CR (1986) Resources, values and development. Econ Philos 2(2):282–291
Biggieri M, Libanora R, Mariani S, Menchini L (2006) Children conceptualising their capabilities: results of a survey conducted during the first children’s world congress on child labour. J Hum Dev 7:59–83
Chester MV, Allenby B (2018) Toward adaptive infrastructure: flexibility and agility in a non-stationarity age. Sustain Resil Infrastruct 2018:1–19
Clark D (2005) The capability approach: its development, critiques and recent advances. Global Poverty Research Group GPRG-WPS-032, Manchester
Clark SS, Chester MV, Seager TP, Eisenberg DA (2018) The vulnerability of interdependent urban infrastructure systems to climate change: could phoenix experience a Katrina of extreme heat? Sustain Resil Infrastruct. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2018.1448668
Congressional Research Service (2004) Critical infrastructure and key assets: definition and identification. CRS Report for Congress. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/RL32631.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
Cutter SL, Emrich CT (2006) Moral hazard, social catastrophe: the changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604(1):102–112
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261
Day R, Walker G, Simcock N (2016) Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy 93:255–264
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2013) National infrastructure protection plan (NIPP): partnering for critical infrastructure security and resilience. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Washington, DC
Frediani AA (2006) Participatory methods and the capability approach. HDCA introductory briefing note. Human Development and Capability Association, Southborough
Ganin AA, Massaro E, Gutfraind A, Steen N, Keisler JM, Kot A, Mangoubi R, Linkov I (2016) Operational resilience: concepts, design and analysis. Sci Rep 6:19540
GAO (2013) Critical infrastructure protection: DHS list of priority assets needs to be validated and reported to congress. United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO, Washington, DC
GAO (2014) Critical infrastructure protection: DHS action needed to enhance integration and coordination of vulnerability assessment efforts. United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO, Washington, DC
Hall J, Giovannini E, Morrone A, Ranuzzi G (2010) A framework to measure the progress of societies. OECD Stat Work Papers 2010(5):0–1
Helbing D (2013) Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 497(7447):51–59
Jahan S (2002) Measuring living standard and poverty: human development index as an alternate measure. University of Massachusetts Political Economy Research Institute, Massachusetts
Kenrick DT, Griskevicius V, Neuberg SL, Schaller M (2010) Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect Psychol Sci 5(3):292–314
Kim Y, Eisenberg DA, Bondank EN, Chester MV, Mascaro G, Underwood BS (2017) Fail-safe and safe-to-fail adaptation: decision-making for urban flooding under climate change. Clim Change 145(3–4):397–412
Koltko-Rivera ME (2006) Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Rev Gen Psychol 10(4):302
Marchese D, Reynolds E, Bates ME, Morgan H, Clark SS, Linkov I (2018) Resilience and sustainability: similarities and differences in environmental management applications. Sci Total Environ 613:1275–1283
Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50(4):370
Maslow AH (1954) The instinctoid nature of basic needs. J Pers 22(3):326–347
Moteff J (2015) Critical infrastructures: background, policy, and implementation. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Moteff J, Parfomak P (2004) Critical infrastructure and key assets: definition and identification. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Moteff J, Copeland C, Fischer J (2003) Critical infrastructures: what makes an infrastructure critical? Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nussbaum M (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: sen and social justice. Femin Econ 9(2–3):33–59
Nussbaum M (2006) Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Nussbaum M, Sen A (1992) The quality of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Olson KR, Morton LW (2012) The impacts of 2011 induced levee breaches on agricultural lands of Mississippi River Valley. J Soil Water Conserv 67(1):5A–10A
O’Rourke TD, Briggs TR (2007) Critical infrastructure, interdependencies, and resilience. In: The bridge, vol 37. National Academy of Engineering, Washington
PPD-21 (2013) Presidential policy directive: critical infrastructure security and resilience. The While House, Office of the Press Secretary, Washington, DC
Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK (2001) Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Syst 21(6):11–25
Robeyns I (2003) An introduction to the capabilities approach. http://commonweb.unifr.ch/artsdean/pub/gestens/f/as/files/4760/24995_105422.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2017
Seager TP, Clark SS, Eisenberg D, Thomas JE, Hinrichs M, Kofron R, Jensen CN, McBurnett LR, Snell M, Alderson DL (2017) Redesigning resilience. In: Linkov I, Palma-Oliveira JM (eds) Risk and resilience. Springer, New York
Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Sen A (1999a) Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sen A (1999b) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, New York
Sen A (1999c) The ends and means of development, Chap. 2 from “Development as Freedom”. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sheffi Y (2015) The power of resilience: how the best companies manage the unexpected. MIT Press, Cambridge
Tay L, Diener E (2011) Needs and subjective well-being around the world. J Pers Soc Psychol 101(2):354
United Nations Development Program (2014) Sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2014. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
Verd JM, López M (2011) The rewards of a qualitative approach to life-course research. The example of the effects of social protection policies on career paths. Forum Qual Soc Res. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.3.1753
Villarica H (2011) Maslow 2.0: a new and improved recipe for happiness. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2011/08/maslow-20-a-new-and-improved-recipe-for-happiness/243486/
Woods DD (2015) Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 141:5–9
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. (1360509 and 1441352) as well as funding from the US. Navy under Grant No. (11967796).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, S.S., Seager, T.P. & Chester, M.V. A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure. Environ Syst Decis 38, 339–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9691-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9691-8