Abstract
Scholz (Environ Syst Decis, 2017) proposes how Brunswik’s lens model can be extended to account for planning of sustainable transitions of complex system. In this commentary, an alternative extension is proposed, according to which planning is seen as a process that unfolds in three steps. The first step can be understood with a model construction lens: a planning team builds a representation, that is, a model of a (distal) complex system. In a second step, modeled with a planning lens, the team contrasts its representation of the system with possible alternative states and simulates how the is-state could be transformed into an ought-state. In a third step, modeled with an implementation lens, the team selects and implements a set of actions, thereby leaving the “imaginary space” (Konrad Lorenz) and entering the real world. The commentary also discusses the relationship between the is-state and the ought-state (including the ways to get from one to the other; bottom-up and top-down), the usefulness of integrating research on group processes when modelling the planning phase, and ways to contrast the usefulness of various conceptualizations of the planning process on an empirical basis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
A provocative question may be allowed here: Where is the border? The surface of the eye, the retina, or eventually even the brain? Can the physical brain, including its activities at a given point in time, be conceived as part of the environment? And is the perception of an object located in the brain or must this perception be sharply distinguished from electric activities of the brain? (Note that the philosophy of the mind literature uses the term “qualia” to refer to a reality that cannot be reduced to physical patterns.).
References
Brunswik E (1952) The conceptual framework of psychology. Psychol Bull 49(6):654–656
Janis IL (1972) Victims of groupthink: a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 55:623–655
Leary DE (1987) From act psychology to probabilistic functionalism: the place of Egon Brunswik in the history of psychology. In: Ash MG, Woodward WR (eds) Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 115–142
Lorenz K (1943) Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. Z Tierpsychol 5:235–409
Reimer T, Hoffrage U (2006) The ecological rationality of simple group heuristics: effects of group member strategies on decision accuracy. Theor Decis 60:403–438
Scholz R (2017) Managing complexity: from visual perception to sustainable transitions—contributions of Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism. Environ Syst Decis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9655-4
Stasser G, Titus W (1985) Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. J Personal Soc Psychol 48:1467–1478
Tolman EC, Brunswik E (1935) The organism and the causal texture of the environment. Psychol Rev 42(1):43
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for its financial support (SNF 100014-140503/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This Perspectives paper is a comment on Scholz’s “Managing complexity: from visual perception to sustainable transitions—contributions of Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism”, Environ Syst Decis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9655-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoffrage, U. From representation via planning to action: an extension of Egon Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism. Environ Syst Decis 38, 69–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9660-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9660-7