Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Regional resilience trust funds: an exploratory analysis for leveraging insurance surcharges

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the financial viability of a series of state trust funds designed to strategically provide financial products to support interventions advanced in the name of climate change adaptation and resilience in the New York metropolitan region. This paper evaluates the proposition that the regional resilience trust funds (RRTFs) could be feasibly capitalized by a surcharge on insurance (Proposition A). Second, the paper evaluates the proposition that the RRTF could sustainably support a range of grants and financial products that could accommodate 100% of states’ unmet resilience needs (Proposition B). The findings of this research support an affirmation of the feasibility of the RRTF pursuant to Proposition A. Consistent with Proposition B, this paper provides evidence in support of a sustainable portfolio strategy that can ultimately be operated independent of the insurance surcharges. However, with the exception of Connecticut, under the modeled assumptions, the RRTFs could not could fulfill 100% of the unmet resilience needs. This paper provides a broader strategic understanding of how investment products and portfolios can be designed to operate in the uncertainties associated with climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adaptation Fund (2017) About the adaptation fund. https://www.adaptation-fund.org/about/

  • Adeniyi O, Perera S, Collins A (2016) Review of finance and investment in disaster resilience in the built environment. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 20(3):224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André C, Boulet D, Rey-Valette H, Rulleau B (2016) Protection by hard defence structures or relocation of assets exposed to coastal risks: contributions and drawbacks of cost-benefit analysis for long-term adaptation choices to climate change. Ocean Coast Manag 134:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeler D, Allen C, Garmestani A, Gunderson L, Linkov I (2016) Panarchy use in environmental science for risk and resilience planning. Environ Syst Decis 36:225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atteridge A (2009) Policy brief: private sector finance and climate change adaptation. Stockholm Environment Institute Stockholm, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyub BM (2014) Systems resilience for multihazard environments: definitions, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk Anal 34(2):340–355. doi:10.1111/risa.12093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Change 21:25033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing on the meaning (s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12(1):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K (2012) Policy discourses of resilience. In: Pelling M, Manuel-Navarrete D, Redclift M (eds) Climate change and the crisis of capitalism: a chance to reclaim self, society and nature. Routledge, London, pp 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton CG (2015) A validation of metrics for community resilience to natural hazards and disasters using the recovery from Hurricane Katrina as a case study. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105(1):67–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Arrow KJ, Barrett S, Biggs R, Brock WA, Crépin AS, Li CZ (2012) General resilience to cope with extreme events. Sustainability 4(12):3248–3259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of New York (2013) Special initiative for rebuilding and resiliency, chapter 19, funding. Office of the Mayor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • City of New York (2016) Action plan incorporating amendments 1–12 for CDBG-DR funds. Office of the Mayor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Connecticut Department of Housing (2015) Community development block grant disaster recovery program: substantial amendment to the action plan. Retrived from www.ct.gov/doh/lib/doh/final_substantial_amendment_for_approval.pdf

  • Connecticut Department of Housing (2016) Community development block grant disaster recovery program substantial amendment to the action plan. State of Connecticut, Hartford

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (2016) The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Nat Hazards 80:741–758. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J, Jacobson C, Lyth A, Dedekorkut-Howes A, Baldwin C, Ellison J, Holbrook N, Howes M, Serrao-Neumann S, Singh-Peterson L, Smith T (2016) Interrogating resilience: toward a typology to improve its operationalization. Ecol Soc 21(2), Art 27. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss2/art27/

  • Davies T (2015) Developing resilience to naturally triggered disasters. Environ Syst Decis 35:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd K (2000) Adjusting for risk: an improved sharpe ratio. Int Rev Econ Finance 9(3):209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson I (2000) The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landsc Urb Plan 48(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen IG, Yager J, Hanson M, Bosher L (2016) Planning for an uncertain future: can multicriteria analysis support better decision making in climate planning? J Plan Educ Res 36(3):349–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2016) Draft interagency concept for community resilience indicators and national-level measures. mitigation framework leadership group draft concept paper. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1466085676217-a14e229a461adfa574a5d03041a6297c/FEMA-CRI-Draft-Concept-Paper-508_Jun_2016.pdf

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2017) Establishing a deductible for FEMA’s public assistance program: a proposed rule. 82 F.R:4064–4097

  • Fenton A, Wright H, Afionis S, Paavola J, Huq S (2014) Debt relief and financing climate change action. Nat Clim Change 4(8):650–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floodplains by Design (2016) A new approach. http://www.floodplainsbydesign.org/new-approach/

  • Fox-Lend C, Bates M, Linkov I (2015) A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: an illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula. Environ Syst Decis 35:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridahl M, Linnér BO (2016) Perspectives on the green climate fund: possible compromises on capitalization and balanced allocation. Clim Dev 8(2):105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galletta A (2013) Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: from research design to analysis and publication. NYU Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert GW (2010) Disaster resilience: a guide to the literature. NIST Special Publication #1117, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glasserman P (2013) Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering, vol 53. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann W, Ingersoll J, Spiegel M, Welch I (2007) Portfolio performance manipulation and manipulation-proof performance measures. Rev Financial Stud 20(5):1503–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith J, Vermeule A (2002) Empirical methodology and legal scholarship. Univ Chic Law Rev 69(1):153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DE (2013) Doing research in the real world. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Seasholes MS, Biery D (2015) The portfolio improvement rule and the CAPM. Harvard Business School, Technical Note: N9-216-027 (Revised February 2016). Harvard Business School, Cambridge

  • Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Change 19(2):240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S, Shah A, Brown C, Lempert R, Gill S (2012) Investment decision making under deep uncertainty—application to climate change. World Bank Policy research working paper no. 6193. World Bank, Washington. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2143067

  • Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee-Morlot J (2013) Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Change 3(9):802–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart C (1998) Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann B (2011) Operationalizing the adaptation fund: challenges in allocating funds to the vulnerable. Clim Policy 11(4):1086–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R, Bader D, Kushnir Y, Little C, Blake R, Rosenzweig C (2015) New York City panel on climate change 2015 report, chapter 1: climate observations and projections. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1336(1):18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R, Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Bader D, Sohl L (2016) Climate science for decision-making in the New York metropolitan region. In: Parris AS, Garfin GM, Dow K, Meyer R, Close SL (eds) Climate in context: science and society partnering for adaptation. Wiley, New York, pp 51–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs B, Lee C, Watson S, Dunford S, Coutts-Smith A (2016) Adaptation planning process and government adaptation architecture support regional action on climate change in New South Wales, Australia. In: Leal W (ed) Innovation in climate change adaptation. Springer International Publishing, Zurich, pp 17–29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan JM (2015) Adaptive capacity of commercial real estate firms in New York City to urban flooding. J Water Clim Change 6(3):486–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan JM (2017) From climate change to national security: an analysis of the obama administration’s federal resilience mandates and measures. Nat Hazards Rev. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000273

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp AC, Hill TD, Vane CH, Cahill N, Orton PM, Talke SA, Hartig EK (2017) Relative sea-level trends in New York city during the past 1500 years. Holocene. doi:10.1177/0959683616683263

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJ, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Glob Environ Change Part B Environ Hazards 5(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight-Lenihan S (2016) Benefit cost analysis, resilience and climate change. Clim Policy 16(7):909–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton K, Lynn L, Goldberg RA, Rosenzweig C, Hogrefe C, Rosenthal JK, Kinney PL (2007) Projecting heat-related mortality impacts under a changing climate in the New York City region. Am J Public Health 97(11):2028–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin S, Fox-Lent C, Eisenberg DA, Trump BD, Wallace S, Chadderton C, Linkov I (2015) Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environ Syst Decis 35(2):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Anderies J, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes T, Wilson J (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1): 19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/main.html

  • LePore A (ed) (2016) The future of disaster management in the US: rethinking legislation, policy, and finance. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liesiö J, Salo A (2012) Scenario-based portfolio selection of investment projects with incomplete probability and utility information. Eur J Oper Res 217(1):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur J Oper Res 190(3):679–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Connor J, Butler JRA, Jaya IKD, Nikmatullah A (2016) Evaluating economic costs and benefits of climate resilient livelihood strategies. Clim Risk Manag 12:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long D (2014) An investor’s perspective on climate adaptation. In: The national workshop on large landscape conservation. Network for Landscape Conservation, Washington

  • Masson V, Marchadier C, Adolphe L, Aguejdad R, Avner P, Bonhomme M, Bretagne G, Briottet X, Bueno B, de Munck C, Doukari O (2014) Adapting cities to climate change: a systemic modelling approach. Urb Clim 10:407–429. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2014.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matyas D, Pelling M (2015) Positioning resilience for 2015: the role of resistance, incremental adjustment and transformation in disaster risk management policy. Disasters 39(s1):s1–s18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechler R (2016) Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost–benefit analysis. Nat Hazards 81(3):2121–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechler R, Czajkowski J, Kunereuther H, Michel-Kerjan E, Botzen W, Keating A, McQuistan C, Cooper N, O’Donnell I (2014) Making communities more flood resilient: the role of cost benefit analysis and other decision-support tools in disaster risk reduction. Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance/The Wharton School, the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urb Plan 147:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menoni S, Molinari D, Parker D, Ballio F, Tapsell S (2012) Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies. Nat Hazards 64(3):2057–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodys (2016) Research & ratings: issurer research. Retrived from https://www.moodys.com/credit-ratings/

  • Müller B (2009) International adaptation finance: the need for an innovative and strategic approach. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, vol. 6 (11). IOP Publishing, Bristol, p 112008

  • Multihazard Mitigation Council (2005) Natural hazard mitigation saves: an independent study to assess the future savings from mitigation activities volume 2 study documentation. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Standards and Technology (2015a) Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems, vol 1. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington. doi:10.6028/NIST.SP.1190v1

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Standards and Technology (2015b) Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems, vol 2. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington. doi:10.6028/NIST.SP.1190v2

    Google Scholar 

  • natureVest (2016) D.C. Green Infrastructure Fund. http://www.naturevesttnc.org/business-lines/green-infrastructure/dc-green-infrastructure

  • Nelson DR (2011) Adaptation and resilience: responding to a changing climate. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2(1):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (2016) Action plan amendment number 18—substantial amendment. State of New Jersey, Trenton

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson L, Jerneck A, Thoren H, Persson J, O’Byrne D (2015) Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Sci Adv 1(4):e1400217. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauw WP, Klein RJ, Vellinga P, Biermann F (2016) Private finance for adaptation: do private realities meet public ambitions? Clim Change 134(4):489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng C, Yuan M, Gu C, Peng Z, Ming T (2017) A review of the theory and practice of regional resilience. Sustain Cities Soc 29:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson A, Remling E (2014) Equity and efficiency in adaptation finance: initial experiences of the adaptation fund. Clim Policy 14(4):488–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BL, Mustelin J, Maloney MC (2015) Climate adaptation heuristics and the science/policy divide. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 20(3):467–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy T, Zhanje S, Taylor T (2011) Adaptation fund: a fund to satisfy Africa’s needs?. Institute for Security Studies, Corruption & Governance Programme (ISS), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin J (2014) The resilience dividend: being strong in a world where things go wrong. Public Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal JK, Kinney PL, Metzger K (2014) Intra-urban vulnerability to heat-related mortality in New York City, 1997–2006. Health Place 30:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikula N, Mancillas J, Linkov I, McDonagh J (2015) Risk management is not enough: a conceptual model for resilience and adaptation-based vulnerability assessments. Environ Syst Decis 35:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadelmann M, Michaelowa A, Roberts JT (2013) Difficulties in accounting for private finance in international climate policy. Clim Policy 13(6):718–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadelmann M, Persson Å, Ratajczak-Juszko I, Michaelowa A (2014) Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: are they friends or foes? Int Environ Agreem Politics Law Econ 14(2):101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of New York (2016) Bond sale schedule. Divison of the Budget, State of New York, Albany, NY

  • Tanner T, Surminski S, Wilkinson E, Reid R, Rentschler J, Rajput S, Lovell E (2016) The triple dividend of resilience: a new narrative for disaster risk management and development. In: Surminksk S, Tanner T (eds) Realising the ‘triple dividend of resilience’. Springer International Publishing, Zurich, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu H (2015) Defining resilience using probabilistic event trees. Environ Syst Decis 35:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit (USCRT) (2016) Funding opportunities. https://toolkit.climate.gov/content/funding-opportunities

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2011) National preparedness goals. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington. https://www.fema.gov/pdf/prepared/npg.pdf

  • Vajjhala S (2017) Personal interview, 23 Sep 2017

  • Vella K, Butler WH, Sip N, Chapin T, Murley J (2016) Voluntary collaboration for adaptive governance: the southeast Florida regional climate change compact. J Plan Educ Res 36(3):363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkiss P, Hunt A, Blyth W, Dyszynski J (2015) The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment: a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability. Clim Change 132(3):401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White House (2016) Standards and finance to support community resilience. Executive Office of the President, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildlife Conservation Society (2017a) The climate adaptation fund: program information. http://wcsclimateadaptationfund.org/program-information

  • Wildlife Conservation Society (2017b) The climate adaptation fund: 2017 grants program applicant guidance document. http://wcsclimateadaptationfund.org/program-information

  • Wise RM, Fazey I, Smith MS, Park SE, Eakin HC, Van Garderen EA, Campbell B (2014) Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob Environ Change 28:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Wang J, Wan J, Jia H (2010) Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective. Nat Hazards 53(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Regional Plan Association (USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, 407 Gund Hall, 48 Quincy Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    Jesse M. Keenan

Authors
  1. Jesse M. Keenan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse M. Keenan.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Potential Projects and Products of a Regional Resilience Trust Fund

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Potential Projects and Products of a Regional Resilience Trust Fund

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Potential Projects and Products of a Regional Resilience Trust Fund

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Potential Projects and Products of a Regional Resilience Trust Fund

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keenan, J.M. Regional resilience trust funds: an exploratory analysis for leveraging insurance surcharges. Environ Syst Decis 38, 118–139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9656-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9656-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation