Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of a national food industry based on environmental performance and condition indicators: critical success and barriers of EMS implementation in Tunisia

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to assess environmental performance indicators (EPIs) of Tunisian food industry as well as the effectiveness of its environmental management system (EMS) according to the ISO 14001 standard. It is related to the management effort which is measured by management performance indicators and to organization’s operations representing the operational performance indicators in order to reduce the significance of environmental impacts. Otherwise, it does reflect critical success and barriers of environmental performance of a food company for its management and operation processes according to the Tunisian context. Moreover, this research focuses on environmental condition indicators (ECIs) in developing of environmental performance evaluation (EPE). EPIs and ECIs depend closely on the compliance of the food company with applicable laws and regulatory requirements that stimulate the pollution prevention. Furthermore, EPE integrates environmental and human health risks in assessment process consequently ensuring the adoption of a new policy by decision makers under the concept of continuous improvement. However, it should discuss a voluntary initiative taking by the top managers to prevent pollution and to share information in a structured and regular way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alshuwaikhat HM, Abubaka I (2008) An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. J Clean Prod 16:1777–1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anton WRQ, Deltas G, Khannac M (2004) Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. J Environ Econ Manage 48:632–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arimura TH, Hibiki A, Katayama H (2008) Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? Acase for environmental management systems. J Environ Econ Manage 55:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manag J 43(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manag Sci 32:1231–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos LMS, Heizen DAD, Verdinelli MA, Miguel PAC (2015) Environmental performance indicators: a study on ISO 14001 certified companies. J Clean Prod 99:286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curkovic S, Sroufe R (2010) Using ISO14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy. Bus Strateg Environ. doi:10.1002/bse.671

    Google Scholar 

  • Daddi T, Magistrelli M, Frey M, Iraldo F (2011) Do environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Italian companies. Environ Dev Sustain 13:845–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daddi T, Frey M, De Giacomo MR, Testa F (2015) Macro-economic and development indexes and ISO 14001 certificates: a cross national analysis. J Clean Prod 108:1239–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall N, Edwards DJ (2006) Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources, and ownership structure. Strateg Manag J 27(4):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SJ, Caldeira K, Matthews HD (2010) Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Sci Mag 329:1330–1333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • G4 Sector Disclosures (2014) Food processing. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/ GRI-G4-Food-Processing-Sector-Disclosures.pdf

  • Global metrics for the environment, EPI report (2016). http://epi.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2016EPI_Full_Report_opt.pdf

  • Gordon F, Jonathan NH, Philip AA (2010) Effectiveness of planning and implementation stages of the ISO14001 standards EMS at Obuasi gold mine. Am J soc Manag Sci, Ghana. doi:10.5251/ajsms.2010.1.1.1.12

    Google Scholar 

  • Granly B, Welo T (2014) EMS and sustainability: experiences with ISO 14001 and Eco-Lighthouse in Norwegian metal processing SMEs. J Clean Prod 64:194–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall R (1992) The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strateg Manag J 13:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hřebiček J, Faldik O, Edward Kasem E, Trenz O (2015a) Determinants of sustainability reporting in food and agriculture sectors. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun 63(2):539–552. doi:10.11118/actaun201563020539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hřebiček J, Soukopová J, Trenz O (2015b) Current trends of economic modelling of sustainable corporate performance and reporting—review and research agenda. Procedia Eco Finan 12:234–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman RA (2002) Implications of environmental management for operations management. Prod Plan Control Manag Oper 13(1):47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14001 (2015) Environmental management system—specification with guidance for use. International organization for standardization

  • ISO 14031 (2013) Environmental management—environmental performance evaluation guidelines

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework.

  • Johansson TB, Williams RH, Ishitani H, Edmonds JA (1996) Options for reducing CO2 emissions from the energy supply sector. Energy Policy 24:985–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur H (2011) Impact of human resource factors on perceived environmental performance: an empirical analysis of a sample of ISO 14001 EMS companies in Malaysia. J Sustain Dev 4(1):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon DM, Min-Seak S, Yong-Chil S (2002) A study of compliance with environmental regulations of ISO 14001 certified companies in Korea. J Environ Manag 65:347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire W (2014) The effect of ISO 14001 regulatory compliance in China. Ecol Econ 105:254–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed M (2000) The ISO 14001 EMS implementation process and its implications: a case study of central Japan. J Environ Manag 25:177–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen QA, Hens L (2015) Environmental performance of the cement industry in Vietnam: the influence of ISO 14001 certification. J Clean Prod 96:362–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson L, Persson PO, Rydén L, Darozhka S, Zaliauskiene A (2007) Cleaner production: technologies and tools for resource efficient production. In: Tryckeri N (ed) Book 2 in a series on Environmental Management. The Baltic University Press, Uppsala, Sweden

  • NT 106.02 (1989) Protection de l’environnement-Rejets d’effluents dans le milieu hydrique, National Institute of Normalization and Industrial propriety, INNORPI

  • NT 106.16 (2000) Management environemental—Evaluation de la performance environmentale—Lignes directrices, National Institute of Normalization and Industrial propriety, INNORPI

  • NT 106.09 (2005) Systeme de management environemental—Lignes directrices generales concernant les principes, les systemes et les techniques de mise en oeuvre, National Institute of Normalization and Industrial propriety, INNORPI

  • NT 48.289-8 (2010) Protecteurs individuels contre le bruit—Exigences de sécurité et essais—Partie 8: Serre-tête audio de divertissement, National Institute of Normalization and Industrial property, INNORPI

  • Phan TN, Baird K (2015) The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: the institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance. J Environ Manag 160(2015):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires A, Martinho G, Chang NB (2011) Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques. J Environ Manag 92:1033–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiffert MEB (2008) Environmental impact evaluation using a cooperative model for implementing EMS (ISO 14001) in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Clean Prod 16:1447–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Henriques I (2005) Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manag J 26:159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Brueckner M, Padhy PK (2014) Insights into the state of ISO14001 certification in both small and medium enterprises and industry best companies in India: the case of Delhi and Noida. J Clean Prod 69:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems, SAFA (2014) http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/sustainability_pathways/docs/SAFA_Indicators_Version_3.0.pdf

  • Teece DJ (1980) Contributions and impediments of economic analysis to the study of strategic management. In: Frederisckson JW (ed) Perspectives on strategic management. Harp Bus, New York, pp 39–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Telle K, Larsson J (2007) Do environmental regulations hamper productivity growth? How accounting for improvements of plants’ environmental performance can change the conclusion. Ecol Econ 61:438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa F, Styles D, Iraldo F (2012) Case study evidence that direct regulation remains the main driver of industrial pollution avoidance and may benefit operational efficiency. J Clean Prod 21:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Testa F, Rizzi F, Daddi T, Gusmerotti NM, Frey M, Iraldo F (2014) EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance. J Clean Prod 68:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The European Eco-management and Audit Scheme, EMAS (2014). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/index_en.htm

  • To WM, Tang MNF (2014) The adoption of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in Macao SAR, China: trend, motivations, and perceived benefits. Manag Environ Qual Int J 25(2):244–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffel MW, Marshall JD (2004) Improving environmental performance assessment: comparative analysis of weighting methods used to evaluate chemical release inventories. J Ind Ecol 8(1–2):143–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen P, Rypdal K, Torvanger A, Rive N (2009) Air pollution policies in Europe: efficiency gains from integrating climate effects with damage costs to health and crops. Environ Sci Policy 12:870–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Topuz E, Talinli I, Aydin E (2011) Integration of environmental and human health risk assessment for industries using hazardous materials: a quantitative multi criteria approach for environmental decision makers. Environ Int 37:393–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turki M, Medhioub E, Kallel M (2015) Effectiveness of EMS in Tunisian companies: framework and implementation process based on ISO 14001 standard. Environ Dev Sustain. doi:10.1007/s10668-015-9741-z

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/DEPA (2000) United Nations environment programme/Danish environmental protection agency. Cleaner Production Assessment in Dairy Processing, Industrial Sector Guides

  • Viegas M (2005) Environmental performance evaluation—ISO4031:1999 and the Future. Plenary lecture at the ISO Technical Committee 207 Madrid, 14 Sept 2005

  • Zhang W, Wang W, Wang S (2014) Environmental performance evaluation of implementing EMS (ISO 14001) in the coating industry: case study of a shanghai coating firm. J Clean Prod 64:205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of food enterprise in Tunisia to their collaboration about this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National School of Engineers of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

    Mohamed Turki, Emna Medhioub & Monem Kallel

Authors
  1. Mohamed Turki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emna Medhioub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monem Kallel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Turki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turki, M., Medhioub, E. & Kallel, M. Evaluation of a national food industry based on environmental performance and condition indicators: critical success and barriers of EMS implementation in Tunisia. Environ Syst Decis 37, 423–434 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9646-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9646-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation