Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 525–539 | Cite as

Acclimate—a model for economic damage propagation. Part II: a dynamic formulation of the backward effects of disaster-induced production failures in the global supply network

  • Leonie Wenz
  • Sven Norman Willner
  • Robert Bierkandt
  • Anders Levermann
Article

Abstract

As global warming accelerates extreme weather events such as floods, droughts and storms are likely to increase in intensity and frequency. With regard to a highly globalized world economy built on complex supply and value-added chains, this trend will challenge societies locally and globally. Regional production disruptions might induce shock waves that propagate through the global supply network and evoke supra-regional shortages. While such cascading effects are promoted by forward linkages in the global economic network, the demand-induced backward dynamics respond in a more complex way. On the one hand, backward linkages may additionally spread economic losses and thus aggravate the disaster aftermath. On the other hand, the readdressing of demand enables a readjustment of production, which may weaken or even dissipate shock waves. Here, we analyze the backward effects of disaster-induced production breakdowns by complementing the numerical damage transfer model Acclimate by a demand side. Based on model simulations, we show that the possibility of production extension and demand readdressing may be crucial for mitigating economic losses in the course of an extreme event.

Keywords

Climate change Disaster impacts Resilience Higher-order effects Vulnerability 

References

  1. Bierkandt R, Wenz L, Willner SN, Levermann A (2014) Acclimate—a model for economic damage propagation. Part 1: basic formulation of damage transfer within a global supply network and damage conserving dynamics. Environ Syst Decis. doi:10.1007/s10669-014-9523-4
  2. Bouwer LM, Crompton RP, Faust E, Höppe P, Piekke RA Jr (2007) Confronting Disaster Losses. Science 318:753. doi:10.1126/science.1149628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cochrane H (1997) Economic impacts of a Midwestern earthquake. Q Publ NCEER 11:1–20Google Scholar
  4. Haddad E, Okuyama Y (2012) Spatial propagation of the economic impacts of bombing: the case of the 2006 war in Lebanon. University of Sao Paulo 2012_19Google Scholar
  5. Haddad E, Teixeira E (2013) Economic impacts of natural disasters in megacities: the case of floods in São Paulo, Brazil. ERSA Conf Pap 1–20Google Scholar
  6. Hallegatte S (2008) An adaptive regional input–output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina. Risk Anal 28:779–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hallegatte S (2014) Modeling the roles of heterogeneity, substitution, and inventories in the assessment of natural disaster economic costs. Risk Anal 34:152–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R (2013) Global flood risk under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:816–821. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonkeren O, Giannopoulos G (2014) Analysing critical infrastructure failure with a resilience inoperability input–output model. Econ Syst Res 26:39–59. doi:10.1080/09535314.2013.872604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kajitani Y, Tatano H (2014) Estimation of production capacity loss rate after the great East Japan earthquake and tsunami in 2011. Econ Syst Res 26:13–38. doi:10.1080/09535314.2013.872081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D, Geschke A (2012) Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ Sci Technol 46:8374–8381. doi:10.1021/es300171x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levermann A (2014) Make supply chains climate-smart. Nature 504:27–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mendelsohn R, Emanuel K, Chonabayashi S, Bakkensen L (2012) The impact of climate change on global tropical cyclone damage. Nat Clim Chang 2:205–209. doi:10.1038/nclimate1357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller RE, Blair PD (2009) Input–output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Narayanan B, Aguiar A, McDougalL R (2012) Global trade, assistance and production: the GTAP8 database. Purdue University. [Online] http://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/v8/v8_doco.asp
  17. Okuyama Y, Sahin S (2009) Impact estimation of disasters a global aggregate for 1960 to 2007. Worldbank Open Knowl. ReposGoogle Scholar
  18. Okuyama Y, Santos JR (2014) Disaster impact and input–output analysis. Econ Syst Res 26:1–12. doi:10.1080/09535314.2013.871505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peduzzi P, Chatenoux B, Dao H, De Bono A, Herold C, Kossin J, Mouton F, Nordbeck O (2012) Global trends in tropical cyclone risk. Nat Clim Chang 2:289–294. doi:10.1038/nclimate1410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rahmstorf S, Coumou D (2012) Increase of extreme events in a warming world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:4708Google Scholar
  21. Rose A (2004a) Economic principles, issues, and research priorities in hazard loss estimation. Model Spat Econ Impacts Disasters 13–36Google Scholar
  22. Rose A (2004b) Defining and measuring economic resilience to earthquakes. Disaster Prev Manag 13:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rose A (2007) Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environ Hazards 7:383–398. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rose A, Dongsoon L (2002) Business interruption losses from natural hazards: conceptual and methodological issues in the case of the Northridge earthquake. Glob Environ Chang B Environ Hazards 4:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schellnhuber H-J et al (2012) Turn down the heat–why a 4 C warmer world must be avoided. World BankGoogle Scholar
  26. Sea Rates (2013) International container shipping | freight broker and forwarder. distances and transit times. [Online] www.searates.com/reference/portdistance. Accessed 11 Feb 2014
  27. Sternberg T (2012) Chinese drought, bread and the Arab Spring. Appl Geogr 34:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strzepek K, Yohe G, Neumann J, Boehlert B (2010) Characterizing changes in drought risk for the United States from climate change. Environ Res Lett 5:044012. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Timmer MP (2012) The world input–output database (WIOD). Contents, sources and methods. [Online] www.wiod.org
  30. United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs (1992) Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management. United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Der Veen A (2004) Disasters and economic damage: macro, meso and micro approaches. Disaster Prev Manag 13:274–279. doi:10.1108/09653560410556483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Der Veen A, Logtmeijer C (2005) Economic hotspots: visualizing vulnerability to flooding. Nat Hazards 36:65–80. doi:10.1007/s11069-004-4542-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wenz L, Willner SN, Radebach A, Bierkandt R, Steckel JC, Levermann A (2015) Regional and sectoral disaggregation of multi-regional input–output tables—a flexible algorithm. Econ Syst Res 27. doi:10.1080/09535314.2014.987731
  34. Wiedmann T, Wilting HC, Lenzen M, Lutter S, Palm V (2011) Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input–output analysis. Ecol Econ 70:1937–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonie Wenz
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sven Norman Willner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert Bierkandt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anders Levermann
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)PotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsPotsdam UniversityPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations