Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 591–599 | Cite as

Public perceptions of local flood risk and the role of climate change

  • Wändi Bruine de Bruin
  • Gabrielle Wong-Parodi
  • M. Granger Morgan
Article

Abstract

The IPCC reports that climate change will pose increased risks of heatwaves and flooding. Although survey-based studies have examined links between public perceptions of hot weather and climate change beliefs, relatively little is known about people’s perceptions of changes in flood risks, the extent to which climate change is perceived to contribute to changes in flood risks, or how such perceptions vary by political affiliation. We discuss findings from a survey of long-time residents of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, a region that has experienced regular flooding. Our participants perceived local flood risks as having increased and expected further increase in the future; expected higher future flood risks if they believed more in the contribution of climate change; interpreted projections of future increases in flooding as evidence for climate change; and perceived similar increases in flood risks independent of their political affiliation despite disagreeing about climate change. Overall, these findings suggest that communications about climate change adaptation will be more effective if they focus more on protection against local flood risks, especially when targeting audiences of potential climate sceptics.

Keywords

Flood risk perceptions Climate change beliefs Public perception surveys 

References

  1. Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B et al (1994) What do people know about global climate-change. 1. Mental models. Risk Anal 14:959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boykoff MT (2008) Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995-2004. Climatic Change 86:1–11Google Scholar
  3. Bradford RA, O’Sullivan JJ, van der Craats IM et al (2012) Risk perception—issues for flood management in europe. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2299–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Enviorn Behav 40:72–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burningham K, Fielding J, Thrush D (2007) ‘It’ll never happen to me’: understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters 32:216–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruine de Bruin W, Bostrom A (2013) Assessing what to address in science communication. PNAS 110:14062–14068Google Scholar
  7. Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Fischhoff B (2007) Can adolescents predict significant life events? J Adolesc Health 41:208–210Google Scholar
  8. Corbett JB, Durfee JL (2004) Testing public (un)certainty of science: media representations of global warming. Sci Commun 26:129–151Google Scholar
  9. Deryugina T (2013) How do people update? The effects of local weather fluctuations on beliefs about global warming. Clim Change 118:397–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donner SD, McDaniels J (2013) The influence of national temperature fluctuations on opinions about climate change in the US since 1990. Clim Change 118:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. J Polit 74:796–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischhoff B (1975) Hindsight ≠ Foresight. The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1:288–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guber DL (2013) A cooling climate for climate change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. Am Behav Sci 57:93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton LC, Stampone MD (2013) Blowin’ in the wind: short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather Clim Soc 5:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurd MD (2009) Subjective probabilities in household surveys. Annu Rev Eco 1:1–23Google Scholar
  16. Hurd MD, McGarry K (2002) The predictive validity of subjective probabilities of survival. Econ J 112:966–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller CM, Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2006) The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Anal 26:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L et al (2006) The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Clim Change 77:7–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunkel KE et al (2013) Monitoring and understanding trends in extreme storms: state of knowledge. Bull Am Meteorolo Soc 94(4):499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Y, Johnson EJ, Zaval L (2011) Local warming: daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psychol Sci 22:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  22. Marx SM, Weber EU, Orlove BS, Leiserowitz A, Krantz DH, Roncoli C, Phillips J (2007) Communication and mental processes: experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob Environ Change 17:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Weather Service (2014). http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/crests.php?wfo=pbz&gage=pttp1
  25. O’Connor RE, Yarnal B, Dow K, Jocoy CL, Garbone CJ (2005) Feeling at risk matters: water managers and the decision to use forecasts. Risk Anal 25:1265–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pennsylvania Department of State. Current voter registration statistics. Downloaded on 24 July 2014. http://www.alleghenycounty.us/elect/201204pri/el45.htm
  27. Peterson TC, Stott PA, Herring S (2012) Explaining extreme events of 2011 from a climate perspective. Bull Am Meteorolo Soc 93:1041–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pittsburgh Post Gazette (2004) The flood and more of 2004. Downloaded on 26 July 2014. http://www.post-gazette.com/local/north/2004/12/29/The-flood-and-more-of-2004/stories/200412290273
  29. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ratter BMW, Philipp KHI, von Storch H (2012) Between hype and decline: recent trends in public perception of climate change. Environ Sci Policy 18:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Read D, Bostrom A, Morgan MG et al (1994) What do people know about global climate-change. 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 14:971–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds TW, Bostrom A, Read D et al (2010) Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 30:1520–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2008) Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: people cannot predict the affect evoked by severe flood. Risk Anal 28:771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Change 1:46–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32:957–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stocker T, Dahe Q, Plattnter GK (2013) Working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report (Ar5), climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor AL, Bruine de Bruin W, Dessai S (2014) Climate change beliefs and perceptions of weather-related changes in the United Kingdom. Risk Anal. doi:10.1111/risa.12234
  38. U.S. Census Bureau (2014) State and County QuickFacts. Downloaded on 24 July 2014. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/42/4261000.html
  39. Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66:315–328Google Scholar
  40. Weinstein ND, Diefenbach MA (1997) Percentage and verbal category measures of risk likelihood. Health Edu Res 1997(12):139–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitmarsh L (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res 11:351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wändi Bruine de Bruin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gabrielle Wong-Parodi
    • 2
  • M. Granger Morgan
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Decision ResearchLeeds University Business SchoolLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of Engineering and Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations