Abstract
Little attention was paid to growing air quality concerns until about a decade earlier in India. Indian Government started continuous monitoring of the urban air quality in Taj corridor area to protect the heritage monuments like Agra Fort, Fatehpur Sikri, the bird sanctuary at Bharatpur National Park and also the human health associated with air pollution. The aim of this study was to address air quality assessment using fuzzy synthetic evaluation model. The model was designed for four air pollutants (sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, suspended particulate matters and respirable suspended particulate matter). In the present paper, an approach is demonstrated for the determination of fuzzy air quality index by aggregating the four pollutants. The model also considers the weights of individual pollutants during aggregation. The weights of individual pollutants were determined using analytical hierarchical process. The model was applied for air quality assessment in four monitoring stations situated in Taj Trapezium Zone.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Baldauf RW, Lane DD, Marote GA (2001) Ambient air quality monitoring network design for assessing human health impacts from exposures to airborne contaminants. Environ Monit Assess 66(1):63–76
Baldauf RW, Lane DD, Marotz GA, Barkman HW, Pierce T (2002) Application of a risk assessment based approach to designing ambient air quality monitoring networks for revaluating non-cancer health impacts. Environ Monit Assess 78:213–227
Bishoi B, Prakash A, Jain VK (2009) A comparative study of air quality index based on factor analysis and US-EPA methods for an urban environment. Aerosol Air Qual Res 9:1–17
Cairncross EK, John J, Zunckel M (2007) A novel air pollution index based on the relative risk of daily mortality associated with short-term exposure to common air pollutants. Atmos Environ 41:8442–8454
Chang N, Chen HW, King SK (2001) Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. J Environ Manag 63:293–305
Chiu G, Guttorp P, Westveld A (2008) A latent health factor index via generalized linear mixed models, with application to ecological health assessment. Working paper series no. 2008-08. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo
Cogliani E (2001) Air pollution forecast in cities by an air pollution index highly correlated with meteorological variables. Atmos Environ 35:2871–2877
Fisher B (2003) Fuzzy environmental decision-making: applications to air pollution. Atmos Environ 37:1865–1877
Gent JF, Triche EW, Holford TR, Belanger K, Bracken MB, Beckett WS et al (2003) Association of low-level ozone and fine particulates with respiratory symptoms in children with asthma. J Am Med Assoc 290(14):1859–1867
Gurjar BR, Butler TM, Lawrence MG, Lelieveld J (2008) Evaluation of emissions and air quality in megacities. Atmos Environ 42:1593–1606
GVAQI (1997) Greater Vancouver Regional District Air Quality and Source Control Department, Burnaby, BC, Canada
Hajek P, Olej V (2009) Air quality indices and their modelling by hierarchical fuzzy inference systems. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 5:661–672
Harrison RM, Deacon AR (1998) Spatial correlation of automatic air quality monitoring at urban background sites: implications for network design. Environ Technol 19:121–132
Khanna N (2000) Measuring environmental quality: an index of pollution. Ecol Econ 35:191–202
Koenig JQ, Mar JF (2000) Sulphur dioxide: evaluation of current California air quality standards with respect to protection of children. Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington, California Air Resource Board, California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
Lagona F (2005) Air quality indices via non homogeneous hidden Markov models. In: Proceedings of the Italian statistical society conference on statistics and environment, Contributed Papers, CLEUP—Padova, pp 91–94
Lee CC (1990) Fuzzy Logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller—part 1. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20(2):404–418
Li HL, Huang GH, Zou Y (2008) An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for assessing health-impact risk from air pollution. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:789–803
Malaysia (1997) A guide to Air Pollutant Index in Malaysia. Department of Environment, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Mandal T, Gorai AK, Pathak G (2012) Development of fuzzy air quality index using soft computing approach. Environ Monit Assess 184(10):6187–6196. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2412-0
McKone TE, Deshpande AW (2005) Can fuzzy logic bring complex environmental problems into focus? Environ Sci Technol 39:42A–47A
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), India (1994) Central pollution control board notification, Nos. 384 (E), dated 11th April 1994 and S.O. 935(E) dated 14th Oct 1998, New Delhi, India
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), India (2009) Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi. http://www.cpcb.nic.in/National_Ambient_Air_Quality_Standards.php. Accessed 12 Aug 2013
Onkal-Engin G, Demir I, Hiz H (2004) Assessment of urban air quality in Istanbul using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Atmos Environ 38(23):3809–3815
Ontario (1991) A guideline to the Ontario air quality index system. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ont., Canada, ISBN 0-7729-8230-9 Air Resource Branch. https://ia600400.us.archive.org/9/items/guidetoontarioai00mignuoft/guidetoontarioai00mignuoft.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2013
ORAQI (Oak Ridge Air Quality Index) (1970) In environmental indices theory and practice by Wayne R. Ott Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor
Ott WR (1978) Environmental indices: theory and practice. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill International Publication, New York
Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2009) Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:75–91
Sharma M, Pandey R, Maheshwari M, Sengupta B, Shukla BP, Gupta NK, Johri S (2003) Interpretation of air quality data using an air quality index for the city of Kanpur, India. J Environ Eng Sci 2:453–462
Sowlat MH, Gharibi H, Yunesian M, Mahmoudi MT, Lotfi S (2011) A novel, fuzzy-based air quality index (FAQI) for air quality assessment. Atmos Environ 45(12):2050–2059
Swamee PK, Tyagi A (1999) Formation of an air pollution index. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 49(1):88–91
UK (1998) Air pollution—what it means for your health. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Wetherby, UK
USEPA (1976) USEPA, federal register 41 vol 174, Tuesday, September 7, 1976
USEPA (1998) USEPA, federal register 63 vol 236 (1998), Wednesday, December 9, 1998
USEPA (2006) Guidelines for the reporting of daily air quality—the Air Quality Index (AQI), May 2006
WHO (World Health Organization) (2000) Air quality guidelines for Europe, 2nd edn. WHO Regional Publications, Geneva (European Series, No. 91)
Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–38
Acknowledgments
This research work was carried out in part of the corresponding author’s Raman Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded by UGC, New Delhi, India. Authors are also thankful to CPCB for providing the air pollution data on the website for public use.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gorai, A.K., Kanchan, Upadhyay, A. et al. Design of fuzzy synthetic evaluation model for air quality assessment. Environ Syst Decis 34, 456–469 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9505-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9505-6