Environment Systems and Decisions

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 138–149 | Cite as

Design of a standardized geo-database for risk monitoring of potentially polluting marine sites



An increasing availability of geospatial marine data provides an opportunity for hydrographic agencies to contribute to the identification of potentially polluting marine sites (PPMS). This new acronym has been created not only to refer to shipwrecks of modern vessels, but also for other types of marine sites such as dumping areas, pipelines, etc. Independent of the specific type, a PPMS represents a potential source of pollution for the marine environment. Although several type-specific databases are available worldwide (from local to global scale), there is an evident lack of uniformity (e.g., different aims of data collection). A common approach description of these sites at local single-site level may permit aggregation for multi-scale decisions, e.g., for remediation and incident response. To adequately manage these sites, a standardized PPMS geospatial database (GeoDB) application has been designed to collect relevant information suitable for site inventory and geo-spatial analysis. In particular, benefits in structuring the data in conformance with the Universal Hydrographic Data Model (IHO S-100) and encoding using the Geographic Markup Language (GML) are presented. A possible practical storage solution is proposed using a GML-enabled spatial relational database management system. Finally, a Web GIS deployment is illustrated, being the simplest way to communicate to the public the collected information, with the related possibility of using the data as a Web Map Service in almost any GIS, allowing for better development and integration with other available datasets. The adoption of the PPMS GeoDB product specification as part of the IHO S-100 series would represent an innovative and important contribution from the hydrographic community to reduce, or at least better manage, environmental and economic risks related to PPMSs.


Risk monitoring Spatial standard Marine environment Shipwreck Marine hazards Pollution 


  1. Aichele RO (2010) RUST—creating a new data base for maritime salvage responses. Environ Hist Res. http://www.inforworks.com/rust1.htm
  2. Alcaro L, Amato E, Cabioch Fh, Farchi C, Gouriou V (2007) DEEPP project development of European guidelines for potentially polluting shipwrecks. EU D.G. Environment, Civil Protection Unit, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Aznar-Gomez MJ (2010) Treasure hunters, sunken state vessels and the 2001 UNESCO convention on the protection of underwater cultural heritage. Int J Mar Coast Law 25:209–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baikin VG, Chak RO, Divin NA, Leonov VI (1980) Corrosion protection of tanks for the storage of crude oil. Chem Pet Eng 16(5):312–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett MJ (2011) Potentially polluting shipwrecks. Master project, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavaleri L (2007) The MEDATLAS wind and wave atlas in the Mediterranean Sea—a combined use of buoy, model and satellite data (abstract only). In: Queffeullou P, Quentel ML (eds) Globwave project workshop, Brest, France, 20–21 Sep 2007, Plouzane (France). IFREMER, pp 14–15 (citeulike-article-id: 8192937)Google Scholar
  7. Cleland JH (1995) Corrosion risks in ship’s ballast tanks and the IMO pathogen guidelines. Eng Fail Anal 2(1):79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CoE (2012) The environmental impact of sunken shipwrecks. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1869Google Scholar
  9. Cowell A, Gibbs W (2007) Nazi U-boat imperils Norwegians decades after the war. The New York Times, New York City, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniel P, Gilbert T, Hackett B, Hines A, Tiercelin C (2008) Operational metocean products and services in support of marine pollution emergency response operations. In: International oil spill conference (AIOSC 2008), Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Etkin DS (1999) Oil spill reference guide. Cutter Information Corp, Arlington, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Etkin DS (2002) Analysis of past marine oil spill rates and trends for future contingency planning. In: 25th Arctic and marine oilspill programme (AMOP) technical seminar, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Environment Canada, pp 227–252Google Scholar
  13. Fingas MF (2011) Oil spill science and technology: prevention, response, and cleanup. Elsevier, Burlington, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Furieri A (2012) SpatiaLite Cookbook, p 151. http://www.gaia-gis.it/gaia-sins/Spatialite-Cookbook-PDF.zip
  15. Gertler C, Yakimov MM, Malpass MC, Golyshin PN (2009) Shipping-related accidental and deliberate release into the environment. In: Timmis KN (ed) Microbiology of hydrocarbons, oils, lipids, 1st edn. Springer, New York, pp 244–256Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert T (1998) Maritime response operations—requirements for met/ocean data and services. In: Conference on meteorological and oceanographic services for marine pollution emergency operations (MARPOLSER 98), July 13–17, 1998. World Meteorological Organisation Report #960, pp 67–89Google Scholar
  17. Girin M (2004) European experience in response to potentially polluting shipwrecks. Mar Technol Soc J 38(3):21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology and information systems. In: Guarino N (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS 1998). IOS Press, Trento, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  19. Hamblin JD (2008) Poison in the well: radioactive waste in the oceans at the dawn of the nuclear age. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Herbert J (2013) The challenges and implications of removing shipwrecks in the 21st century. Lloyd’s London, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunter D, Rafter J, Fawcett J, van der Vlist E, Ayers D, Duckett J, Watt A, McKinnon L (2007) Beginning XML, 4th edn. Wiley, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  22. ICRAMM-CEDRE (2007a) Development of European guidelines for potentially polluting shipwrecks—proposal. D.G. Environment, Civil Protection Unit, Rome, Italy and Brest Cedex 2, FranceGoogle Scholar
  23. ICRAMM-CEDRE (2007b) Outcomes of the potentially polluting shipwrecks workshop: technical, legal and financial perspectives, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  24. IHO (2010) IHO S-100—Universal Hydrographic Data Model, 1.0.0 edn. International Hydrographic Bureau, MonacoGoogle Scholar
  25. IMO (2004) Implementation of the OPRC convention and the OPRC–HNS protocol and relevant OPRC conference resolutions. Marine Environment Protection Committee, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. ISO (2005) ISO 19109—geographic information—rules for application schema. International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  27. ISO (2007) ISO 19136:2007 geographic information—geography markup language. International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson E (2008) Japan asked to avert disaster from Pacific World War II wrecks. Bloomberg, New York City, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaffka AV (1996) Sea-dumped chemical weapons: aspects, problems and solutions. In: Paper presented at the NATO advanced research workshop on ‘sea-dumped chemical munitions’, Kalingrad, RussiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Kolpackov B (2007) An introduction to XML data binding in C++. The C++ source. http://www.artima.com/cppsource/xml_data_binding.html
  31. Kreibich JA (2010) Using SQLite, 1st edn. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Lake R (2004) Geography mark-up language (GML). Foundation for the GeoWeb. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  33. Macleod ID (2010) Japanese ships and aircraft. Corrosion rates. In: International corrosion workshop, Newport News, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Manca S, Cau P, Soru C, Vargiu A, Muroni D, Peneva E (2011) A web based framework to face issue of marine water vulnerability. In: 3rd international conference on computer research and development (ICCRD), 11–13 March 2011, pp 328–332. doi:10.1109/iccrd.2011.5763886
  35. Masetti G, Calder B, Alexander L (2012a) Developing a GIS-database and risk index for potentially polluting marine sites. In: Paper presented at the Canadian hydrographic conference 2012, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, May 15–May 17Google Scholar
  36. Masetti G, Calder B, Alexander L (2012b) Potentially polluting marine sites GeoDB. Product specification proposal center for coastal and ocean mapping. Joint Hydrographic Center, Durham, NHGoogle Scholar
  37. Masetti G, Calder B, Alexander L (2012c) Potentially polluting marine sites GeoDB: an S-100 geospatial database as an effective contribution to the protection of the marine environment. Int Hydrogr Rev 8:27–40Google Scholar
  38. Maue P, Schade S (2009) Semantic annotations in OGC standards. Discussion paper no. 08-167r1, Wayland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Melchers RE (2005) The effect of corrosion on the structural reliability of steel offshore structures. Corros Sci 47:2391–2410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Michel K, Winslow T (2000) Cargo ship bunker tankers: designing to mitigate oil spills. In: SNAME joint California sections meeting, May 14, 1999Google Scholar
  41. Michel J, Gilbert T, Etkin DS, Urban R (2005) Potentially polluting wrecks in marine waters. In: Paper presented at the international oil spill conference, Miami, USAGoogle Scholar
  42. Monfils R (2005) The global risk of marine pollution from WWII shipwrecks: examples from the seven seas. In: Paper presented at the international oil spill conference, Miami Beach, USAGoogle Scholar
  43. Monfils R, Gilbert T, Nawadra S (2006) Sunken World War II shipwrecks of the Pacific and East Asian Regions. The need for regional collaboration to address the potential pollution threat. Ocean Coast Manag 49:779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Navy US (2004) USS Mississinewa oil removal operations. Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. NRC (2003) Oil in the sea III: inputs, fates, and effects. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. OGC (2003) OGC reference model. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Overfield ML (2005) Resources and under sea threats (RUST) database: identifying and evaluating submerged hazards within the National Marine Sanctuaries. In: Paper presented at the MTS/IEEE oceans conference, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. PAM (2010) Dumping of toxic and radioactive waste and human trafficking in the Mediterranean. Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean, RabatGoogle Scholar
  49. Parker H, Moller T (2008) Sunken oil and the removal of oil from sunken wrecks. Int Oil Spill Conf Proc 1:93–96. doi:10.7901/2169-3358-2008-1-93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rawson C, Crake K, Brown AJ (1998) Assessing the environmental performance of tankers in accidental grounding and collision. SNAME Trans 106:41–58Google Scholar
  51. Redmond MC, Valentine DL (2011) Natural gas and temperature structured a microbial community response to the deepwater horizon oil spill. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1108756108
  52. Ritchie W, Bedborough D, Davies J, Dickson D, Hall M, Hepworth R, Kingston P, Mailes J, Monaghan P, O’Sullivan M, Tulloch B, Uscher M, Kingham L (1994) Wreck of the tanker Braer: the environmental impact of the oil spill. Spill Sci Technol Bull Am Meteorol Soc 1(2):101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schumacher M (1979) Seawater corrosion handbook. Noyes Data Corp, Park Ridge, NJGoogle Scholar
  54. Short JW, Lindenberg MR, Harris PM, Maselko JM, Pella JJ, Rice SD (2004) Estimate of oil persisting on the beaches of Prince William Sound 12 years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environ Sci Technol 38(1):19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Siyuan L, Yan Z, Yongsheng Z, Weilin H, Kaisheng H, Ming J, Jingyi Z, Jiewei Z (2010) Two kinds of crude oil spill in simulation weathering process performance change. Guangdong Chem Ind 5:049Google Scholar
  56. Southwell CR, Bultman JD, Alexander AL (1976) Corrosion of metals in tropical environments. Materials performance. Final report of 16-year exposuresGoogle Scholar
  57. SPREP (2002) A regional strategy to address marine pollution from World War II wrecks. In: 13th south Pacific regional environment program, Majuro, Marshall IslandsGoogle Scholar
  58. Steiniger S, Hunter AJS (2012) Free and open source GIS software for building a spatial data infrastructure. Geospatial free and open source software in the 21st century. In: Bocher E, Neteler M (eds) Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 247–261. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10595-1_15
  59. Talouli A, Gilbert T, Monfils Gilbert R (2009) Strategic environmental assessment and potential future shoreline impacts of the oil spill from WWII shipwreck Hoyo Maru Chuuk Lagoon—Federated States of Micronesia. SPREP, Apia, SamoaGoogle Scholar
  60. Tittensor DP, Mora C, Jetz W, Lotze HK, Ricard D, Berghe EV, Worm B (2010) Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466(August):1098–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tørnes JA, Voie ØA, Ljønes M, Opstad AM, Bjerkeseth LH, Hussain F (2002) Investigation and risk assessment of ships loaded with chemical ammunition scuttled in Skagerrak. TA-1907/2002. Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt, Kjeller. http://www.sft.no/publikasjoner/avfall/1907/ta1907.pdf
  62. UNESCO (2010) Underwater cultural heritage in Oceania. In: Guerin U, Egger B, Penalva V (eds) CLT/CIH/MCO/2010/150REVGoogle Scholar
  63. Ventikos NP, Louzis K, Koimtzoglou A (2013) The shipwrecks in Greece are going fuzzy: a study for the potential of oil pollution from shipwrecks in Greek waters. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 19(2):462–491. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.713820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang W, Wang F, Qian Z, Zhang L (2011) GML data management: framework and prototype. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6637:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woodward T (2008) Pacific World War II wrecks pose risk of toxic leaks. Natl Geogr Mag. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/12/081210-pacific-shipwrecks-missions.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Coastal and Ocean MappingDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations