Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Nonparametric estimation of petroleum accident risk to improve environmental protection

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The researchers collected and examined 10 years of petroleum-related accidents in the state capital of New York (NY) to develop a preliminary model (N = 1,005). The goal of the research was to propose an evidence-driven methodology to inform urban environmental policy making and emergency preparedness planning. Albany, NY, USA, was a preferentially selected sample site since it was a large city in an environmentally sensitive region with controversial oil–gas fracking policies being debated within government. The objective of the study was to develop a predictive model from petroleum accident data using nonparametric inferential statistical techniques to avoid the constraints inherent of normal distribution assumptions. A statistically significant model was formulated and tested, which indicated that the probability of petroleum accidents in the gas–oil industry was almost six times higher than their occurrence by people in other groups, such as electricity generation, transportation, hospitals, universities, warehouses, government, businesses, and residences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Amjady N, Vahidinasab V (2013) Security-constrained self-scheduling of generation companies in day-ahead electricity markets considering financial risk. Energy Conver Manag 65(1):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand JWM, Fransoo JC (2002) Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. Int J Op Prod Manag 22(2):241–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branigin RD (2011) Toward a better model for managing scheduling delays and soft cost claims under builders risk insurance policies. Brief 40(4):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalao JPS, Pousinho HMI, Contreras J (2012) Optimal hydro scheduling and offering strategies considering price uncertainty and risk management. Energy 37(1):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantoulaki I, Angelides DC (2013) Risk-based maintenance scheduling using monitoring data for moored floating breakwaters. Struct Saf 41(2):107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellram LM (1996) The use of the case study method in logistics research. J Bus Logist 17(2):93–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL, Nee JCM, Landis JR (1979) Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. Psychol Bull 86(1):974–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghadikolaei HM, Ahmadi A, Aghaei J, Najafi M (2012) Risk constrained self-scheduling of hydro/wind units for short term electricity markets considering intermittency and uncertainty. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(7):4734–4743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin Y, Strang KD (2012) Socio-cultural and multi-disciplinary perceptions of risk. Int J Risk Conting Manag 1(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hari Nugroho DS (2010). Risk-based inspection scheduling planning for intelligent agent in the autonomous fault management. AIP Conf Proc

  • Jun DH, Rayes KE (2011) Fast and accurate risk evaluation for scheduling large-scale construction projects. J Comput Civil Eng 25(5):407–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazempour SJ, Moghaddam MP (2011) Risk-constrained self-scheduling of a fuel and emission constrained power producer using rolling window procedure. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(2):359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski LJ, Ritzman LP, Malhotra MK (2010) Operations management, 9th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Liu L, Ren J, Duan H, Zheng L (2012) Behavior of urban residents toward the discarding of waste electrical and electronic equipment: a case study in Baoding, China. Waste Manag Res 30(11):1187–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan J, Lalwani C, Gardner B (2004) Combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies in logistics research. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(7):565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlow AG, Wray R, Richardson SE (2012) Attitudes and beliefs, not just knowledge, influence the effectiveness of environmental cleaning by environmental service workers. Am J Infect Control 40(3):260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn IA, Andersen AL, Baltz DM, Caffey RH, Carman KR, Fleeger JW, Joye SB, Lin Q, Maltby E, Overton EB, Rozas LR (2010) Oil impacts on coastal wetlands: implications for the Mississippi river delta ecosystem after the deepwater horizon oil spill. Bioscience 62(6):562–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersesian R (2012) Energy risk management. Palisades, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Navigation (NYS) Law, New York State Law (2009)

  • Nysdec.(2013). Chemical and pollution control [petroleum and petroleum spill data from 1978 to 2013]. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Division of Mineral Resources

  • Pousinho HMI, Mendes VMF, Catalao JPS (2012) Scheduling of a hydro producer considering head-dependency, price scenarios and risk-aversion. Energy Convers Manag 56(1):96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levi D, Chen X, Bramel J (2005) The logic of logistics: theory, algorithms, and applications for logistics and supply chain management, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovi SP (2010) Systems approach to management of disasters: methods and applications. Wiley, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Somasundaram P, Babu MR (2012) Risk invoked self-scheduling of a Genco in the day-ahead energy market. J Eng Appl Sci 7(2):136–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. (2013, July 15). Investigators find bodies of more victims. Make progress identifying remains. Lac-Mégantic: what we know, what we don’t. Associated Press pp. A6–A7

  • Stemler SE (2004) A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Pract Assess Res Eval 9(4):66–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang KD (2011) Applying multidisciplinary logistic techniques to improve operations productivity at a mine. Logist Res J 3(4):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang KD (2012a) Applied financial nonlinear programming models for decision making. Int J Appl Decis Sci 5(4):370–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang KD (2012b) Importance of verifying queue model assumptions before planning with simulation software. Eur J Oper Res 218(2):493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang KD (2012c) Logistic planning with nonlinear goal programming models in spreadsheets. Int J Appl Logist 2(4):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang KD (2013a) Planning for hurricane Isaac using probability theory in a linear programming model. Int J Risk Conting Manag 2(1):51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang KD (2013b) Risk management research design ideologies, strategies, methods and techniques. Int Risk Conting Manag 2(2):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2007) The black swan. The impact of the highly improbable. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson H (2012) Fracking boom spurs environmental audit: as hydraulic fracturing unlocks new gas reserves, researchers struggle to understand its health implications. Nature 485(5):557–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanasselt MBA, Renn O (2011) Risk governance. Risk Res J 14(4):431–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt PW, Gardner DC, Haeffele LM (2012) When to use what research design. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Witter RZ, Mckenzie L, Stinson KE, Scott K, Newman LS, Adgate J (2013) The use of health impact assessment for a community undergoing natural gas development. Am J Public Health 103(6):1002–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington D (2009) Reflections on queue modelling from the last 50 years. J Oper Res Soc 60(1):S83–S92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Economics, State University of New York, 640 Bay Road, Regional Higher Education Building, Queensbury, NY, 12804, USA

    Kenneth David Strang

  2. Monmouth University, 400 Cedar Ave, West Long Branch, NJ, 07764, USA

    Roy L. Nersesian

Authors
  1. Kenneth David Strang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy L. Nersesian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth David Strang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strang, K.D., Nersesian, R.L. Nonparametric estimation of petroleum accident risk to improve environmental protection. Environ Syst Decis 34, 150–159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9476-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9476-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation