Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consumption, waste and (un)sustainable development: reflections on the Dutch holiday of Queen’s day

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article aims to interrogate manifold features, uses and manifestations of the term sustainability through critical reflection on paradoxes of “sustainable development.” This article will discuss the implication of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, postmaterialist values theory, and ecological modernization theory all of which expresses a certain relationship between the wealth of a nation and their environment impact. According to these theories, during early industrialization and development, economies use materially intensive resources, until a threshold is reached after which the economic and technological changes allow for more sustainable material use. Simultaneously, it is believed that concerns about environment are secondary to economic concerns and that satisfaction of material needs will lead to higher environmental awareness. The aim of this article is to reflect upon a gap in the literature of empirical case studies to support or refute these theories. While there is a wealth of publications detailing various unsustainable practices in different countries, studies addressing the implication of the accuracy of the triple theories for the global enterprise of development are rare. To compensate for this oversight, this article will address the case of Dutch Queen’s day celebrations in April 2013, based on the document analysis. In generalizing the case of Dutch Queen’s day celebrations to global consumption patterns, this article considers consequences of Western consumption model for the enterprise of global development. It is argued that the Dutch case supports evidence of the (un)sustainability of a consumptive economy operating within a global market. Alternative framework based on cradle-to-cradle and circular economy approaches is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The heaviest criticism lies on McDonough’s monopolizing actions that seem to forever hinder the widespread application of C2C (TM) design despite numerous opportunities for the model to gain a strong foothold in major international companies… McDonough is infamous for clinging onto intellectual property rights rather than relinquishing proprietary control of C2C design and allowing it to spread… Maybe C2C design will flourish if McDonough finally decides to open source C2C, or McDonough may fade into the annals of history as people shift to other similar certification systems or use generic terms to describe what is essential C2C design (http://coolclimate.berkeley.edu/node/427).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Kopnina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopnina, H. Consumption, waste and (un)sustainable development: reflections on the Dutch holiday of Queen’s day. Environ Syst Decis 34, 312–322 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9467-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9467-0

Keywords

Navigation