Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beyond geomorphosites: trade-offs, optimization, and networking in heritage landscapes

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses Danxiashan, a world heritage site in Guangdong province, China, as a case study for planning a hypothetical geotourism network of heritage sites. This landscape has a multiplicity of values—its geoheritage cannot be separated from its ecological or cultural heritage. When designing a network of heritage sites for such a diversely valued landscape trade-offs must be made between differing and potentially conflicting objectives such as geotourism and geoconservation. To solve this multi-criteria decision problem, sites with potential value for people were designated as heritage sites, adapting the concept of geomorphosites—i.e., geomorphological heritage sites—to represent the intersection of anthropic values. In a GIS-based spatial decision support system heritage values for each site were weighted and ranked using the analytic hierarchy process and scenarios for alternative trail systems, and networks of tourism sites were generated by multi-criteria map overlay analysis and networking algorithms. The scenarios generated show how trade-offs can be made between oft-conflicting tourism and conservation objectives, how the design of parks can be optimized for multiple objectives, and how alternative design strategies can be explored. Such an approach could be used in scenario planning workshops to engage stakeholders in participatory design and consensus-based decision-making driven by geospatial science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Basso KH (1996) Wisdom sites in places: landscape and language among the Western Apache. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32(6):389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler RW (2005) The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: implications for management of resources. In: Butler RW (ed) The tourism area lifecycle, vol 1. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, pp 3–12

  • Danxiashan Administrative Committee (2011) Danxiashan tourism statistics (personal communication)

  • Dye AS, Shaw S-L (2007) A gis-based spatial decision support system for tourists of great smoky mountains national park. J Retail Consumer Serv 14:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esri (2011) Cost path (spatial analyst). http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#/Cost_Path/009z00000019000000/

  • Esri (2012a) Applying fuzzy logic to overlay rasters. http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//009z000000rv000000.htm

  • Esri (2012b) Route analysis. http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#/Route_analysis/004700000045000000/

  • Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A (2011) Why your it project may be riskier than you think. Harv Bus Rev 89(9):23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie A, Viles HA (2010) Landscape and geomorphology: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: developing the paradigm. Proc Geol Assoc 199:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y, Peng S, Li F, Lin Z, Chen B, Peng H (2008) Characteristics and scientific values of ecological succession in danxia landform of china. Acta Ecol Sinica 28(7):3384–3389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin H (2011) The short list of danxia landform in china. In: World Danxia: collected papers of the second international symposium on Danxia Landform, Danxiashan, Guangdong, China, October . Danxia geomorphology working group of the IAG

  • Knight J (2010) Evaluating geological heritage: correspondence on ruban, d.a. ‘quantification of geodiversity and its loss’. Proc Geol Assoc 121(3):326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride RA, Taylor MJ, Byrnes MR (2007) Coastal morphodynamics and chenier-plain evolution in Southwestern Louisiana, USA: a geomorphic model. Geomorphology 88:367–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • METI and NASA (2011) ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) version 2. http://www.jspacesystems.or.jp/ersdac/GDEM/E/index.html, http://gdem.ersdac.jspacesystems.or.jp/

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (2008) China Danxia Nomination Text. The Nomination of World Natural Heritage, UNESCO. http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/1335.pdf

  • Mori AS (2011) Ecosystem management based on natural disturbances: hierarchical context and non-equilibrium paradigm. J Appl Ecol 48:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Runge MC, Johnson FA, Williams BK (2007) Adaptive harvest management of north american waterfowl populations. J Ornithol 148:S343–S349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W, Song M (2011) Analytic hierarchy process (ahp) in group decision making and its optimization with an allocation of information granularity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(3):527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena dos Reis R, Henriques MH (2009) Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system for geological heritage. Geoheritage 1(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng H (2001) Danxia geomorphology of China: a review. Chin Sci Bull 46:38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Li F, Zhou T, Chen L, Chen B, Peng H (2008) Special ecological effects of ravines in Danxia landform, China. Acta Ecol Sin 28(7):2947–2953

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning and Design Institute of Sun Yat-sen University (2009) Danxiashan, Guangdong: Managment Planning

  • Pressey RL, Cabeza M, Watts ME, Cowling RM, Wilson KA (2007) Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 22(11):583–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raines GL, Sawatzky DL, Bonham-Carter GF (2010) Incorporating expert knowledge: New fuzzy logic tools in arcgis 10. ArcUser 49:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing the scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 3:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Panizza M (2005) Geomorphosites: definition, assessment, and mapping. Géomorphol Relief Process Environ 3:177–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruban DA (2010) Quantification of geodiversity and its loss. Proc Geol Assoc 121(3):326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky N, Margoluis R (2004) Using adaptive management to improve icdps. In: McShane T, Wells M (eds) Getting biodiversity projects to work. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandker M, Campbell BM, Ruiz-Pérez M, Sayer JA, Cowling R, Kassa H, Knight AT (2010) The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development. Ecol Soc 15(2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Q (2006) The impact of tourism on soils in Zhangjiajie World Geopark. J For Res 17(2):167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallins JA (2006) Geomorphology and ecology: unifying themes for complex systems in biogeomorphology. Geomorphology 77:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2010) China Danxia. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1335

  • UNESCO (2011) The operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/

  • University of Redlands and Spatial Decision Support Consortium (2012) Spatial decision support knowledge portal. http://www.spatial.redlands.edu/sds/

  • Viles HA (2011) Biogeomorphology. In: Gregory KJ, Goudie A (eds) The SAGE handbook of geomorphology. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 246–259

  • Wilson EO (2001) The diversity of life, 2 edn. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Peng S, Lin Z, Chen L, Chen B, Peng H, Rongfeng H (2008) Ecological effect on the hilltop of Danxia landform. Acta Ecol Sin 28(7):3390–3400

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong L, Deng J, Xiang B (2008) Tourism development and the tourism area life-cycle model: a case study of Zhangjiajie Forest Park, China. Tour Manag 29:841–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Prof. Peng Hua from Sun Yat-sen University and the Administrative Committee of Danxiashan for their kind support during my fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan Harmon.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harmon, B., Viles, H. Beyond geomorphosites: trade-offs, optimization, and networking in heritage landscapes. Environ Syst Decis 33, 272–285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9448-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9448-3

keywords

Navigation