Skip to main content
Log in

An analytical design technique for magnetic field therapy devices

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electromagnetic therapy devices designed over the last 45 years have been based on empirical (trial-and-error) techniques. This paper presents a novel approach to designing and engineering therapeutic devices. Based upon using a superconductive quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer for registration of the magnetic field emitted by specific organs in norm and after the injury/pathology, this approach avoids empirical engineering. The signal parameters recorded by the SQUID magnetometer allow one to derive tissue- and/or disease-specific signals. This is made possible using contemporary, state-of-the-art controls with engineering and computer science techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey WR (1981) Tissue interactions with nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Physiol Rev 61:435–514

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adey WR (2004) Potential therapeutic applications of nonthermal EMF: ensemble organization of cells in tissue as a factor of biological field sensing. In: Rosch PJ, Markov MS (eds) Bioelectromagnetic medicine. Marcel Dekker, NY, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Anninos PA, Kokkinidis M, Hoke M, Pantev CH, Lehnertz K, Lutkenhoner B (1986) MEG measurements with SQUID as a diagnostic tool for epileptic patients. Brain Res Bull 16:549–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anninos PA, Tsagas N, Adamopoulos A (1989) A brain model theory for epilepsy and the mechanism for treatment with experimental verification using SQUID measurements. In: Cotterill RM (ed) Models of brain function. New York Cambridge University Press, NY, pp 405–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Anninos PA, Tsagas N, Sandyk R, Derpapas K (1991) Magnetic stimulation in the treatment of partial seizures. Int J Neurosci 60:141–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anninos P, Papadopoulos EI, Kotini Adamopoulos EI (2003) Differential diagnosis of prostate lesions with the use of biomagnetic measurements and non-linear analysis. Urol Res 31:32–36. doi:10.1007/s00240-003-0297-2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes F, Greenebaum B (eds) (2007) Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields, 3rd edn. USA, CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J (1994) SQUIDs. Sci Am 271(22):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbert AP, Wahbeh H, Harling N, Connelly E, Schuffke HC, Forsten C, Gregory WL, Markov MS, Souder JJ, Elmer P, King V (2007) Static magnetic field therapy: a critical review of treatment parameters: eCAM. Oxford University Press, UK, pp 1–7. doi:10.1093/ecam/nem131

    Google Scholar 

  • Kholodov YuA, Gorbach AM (1978) Magnetic fields in neurophysiology. Moscow, Nauka (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liboff AR (2004) Signal shapes in electromagnetic therapies. In: Rosch PJ, Markov MS (eds) Bioelectromagnetic medicine. Marcel Dekker, NY, pp 17–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Markov MS (1994) Biological effects of extremely low frequency magnetic fields. In: Ueno S (ed) Biomagnetic stimulation. Plenum Press, NY, pp 91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Markov MS (2004) Myosin light chain phosphorylation modification depending on magnetic fields II. Experimental. Electromagn Biol Med 23:125–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markov MS (2006) Thermal versus nonthermal mechanisms of interactions between electromagnetic fields and biological systems. In: Ayrapetyan SN, Markov MS (eds) Bioelectromagnetic: current concepts. Dordrecht, Springer, pp 1–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markov M (2007) Magnetic field therapy: a review. Electromagn Biol Med 26(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markov MS, Parker R (2010) Analytical versus empirical: a new approach in designing devices for magnetic field therapy. The 6th international workshop on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields Bodrum, Turkey

  • Markov M, Pilla AA (1994) Modulation of cell-free myosin light chain phosphorylation with weak low frequency and static magnetic fields. In: Frey AH (ed) On the nature of electromagnetic field interactions with biological systems. R. G. Landes Co., Austin, pp 127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilla AA (2007) Mechanisms and therapeutic applications of time-varying and static magnetic fields. In: Barnes F, Greenebaum B (eds) Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields, vol 2, 3rd edn. CRC Press, USA, pp 351–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch PJ, Markov MS (eds) (2004) Bioelectromagnetic medicine. Marcel Dekker, NY, p 850

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakai, Ron, Professor, Medical Physics Chair, Medical Physics Admissions Committee Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin—Madison, personal communication and demonstration on the routine medical application of the SQUID, January, 2011

  • Wikswo JP (2000) Applications of SQUID magnetometers to biomagnetism and nondestructive testing 2000 applications of superconductivity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 139–228

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Parker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, R., Markov, M. An analytical design technique for magnetic field therapy devices. Environmentalist 31, 155–160 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-011-9316-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-011-9316-y

Keywords

Navigation