Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An assessment of ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve, India

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the economic value of selected ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. The direct cost was derived from secondary sources, and indirect and opportunity costs through socioeconomic surveys. For recreational value the individual approach to travel cost method was used, and to assess carbon sequestration the replacement cost method was used. The maintenance cost of the reserve was estimated as US $2,153,174.3 year−1. The indirect costs in terms of crop and livestock depredation by wild animals ranged from US $2,408 to US $37,958 village−1 over a period of 5 years. The dependence of local communities was for fuel wood (US $7,346 day−1), fodder (US $5,290 day−1), small timber, and other nontimber forest products. The recreational value of the reserve was estimated as US $167,619 year−1. With the cost per visitor being US $2.5, the consumers’ surplus was large, showing the willingness of visitors to pay for wildlife recreation. The forests of the reserve mitigate carbon worth US $63.6 million, with an annual flow of US $65.0 ha−1 year−1. The other benefits of the reserve include US $41 million through generation of electricity since 1972. The analysis reveals that, though the benefits outweigh costs, they need to be accrued to local communities so as to balance the distribution of benefits and costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams VM, Pressey RL, Naidoo R (2010) Opportunity costs: who really pays for conservation? Biol Conserv 143:439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badola R (1999) People and protected areas in India. Unsalvya 199:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Badola R, Hussain SA (2003) Conflict in paradise: women and protected areas in the Indian Himalayas. Mt Res Dev 23(3):238–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badola R, Bhardwaj AK, Mukherjee SK (2000) Integrating conservation and development in protected area management—can we do it? Indian For 126:1054–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Bann C (1997) The economic value of mangroves: a manual for researchers. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington D (2002) Fortress conservation. The preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. James Currey, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington D, Schmidt-Soltau K (2004) The social and environmental impacts of wilderness and development. Oryx 38:140–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WG, Nawas F (1973) Impact of aggregation on the estimation of outdoor recreation demand functions. Am J Agric Econ 55:246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess RG (1982) Field research: a source book and field manual. George Allen and Unwin, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell MGR (1982) World forest biomass and primary production data. Academic, London, pp 145–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1994) Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): challenges, potentials, and paradigm. World Dev 22:1437–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology 4:2138–2152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christe M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T (2006) Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol Econ 58:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke R (1986) The handbook of ecological monitoring. Oxford Science, Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2001) Visions, values, valuation, and the need for an ecological economics. Bioscience 51(6):459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Folke C (1997) Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness and sustainability as goals. In: Daily GC (ed) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystem. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystem. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich R, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D, Woodwell GM (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol 1(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS (1994) Functions and values of protected areas: a comprehensive framework for assessing the benefits of protected areas to human Society. In: Munasinghe M, McNeely J (eds) Protected area economics and policy linking conservation and sustainable development. The World Bank, Washigton, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JA, Sherman PB (1990) Economics of protected areas: a new look at benefits and costs. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs IM (1993) Individual travel cost method: estimation and benefit assessment with a discrete and possibly grouped dependent variable. Am J Agric Econ 75(1):84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Stolton S (2005) The role of forested protected areas in supplying drinking water to the world’s biggest cities. In: Trzyna T (ed) The urbane imperative. California Institute of Public Affairs, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Wilson EO (1991) Biodiversity studies: science and policy. Science 253(5021):758–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emerton L, Iyango L, Luwum P, Malinga A (1999) The economic value of Nakivubo Urban wetland, Uganda. IUCN, The World Conservation Union, Eastern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO Forestry Paper No.134. Rome

  • Fisher B, Turner RK, Balmford A et al (2008) Integrating ecosystem services and economic theory. Ecol Appl 18(8):2050–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht JE (1999) The economic value of the environment: cases from South Asia. IUCN, The World Conservation Union, Nepal Country Office, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Turpie JK, Costanza R, Cowling RM, Le Maitre DC, Marais C, Midgley GF (1997) An ecological economic simulation model of mountain fynbos ecosystem: dynamics, valuation and management. Ecol Econ 22(2):141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare R (2000) African elephants and humans in conflict: the outlook for co-existence. Oryx 34:134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RB, Farber S (2002) Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain SA, Badola R (2008) Valuing mangrove ecosystem services: linking nutrient retention function of mangrove forests to enhanced agroecosystem production. Wetlands Ecol Manage 16:441–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iamtrakul P, Teknomo K, Hokao K (2005) Public park valuation using travel cost method. Proc East Asia Soc Transp Stud 5:1249–1264

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1996) Revised guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, reference manual, 5.1–5.53

  • Jack BK, Kousky C, Sims KRE (2008) Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(28):9465–9470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig A, Perrings C, Scholes B (2007) Ecosystem services and the economics of biodiversity conservation. http://www.public.asu.edu

  • Kumari K (1995) An environmental and economic assessment of forest management option: a case study in Malaysia. Environment Department Papers No. 026. Environmental Economics Series, World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Kumari K (1996) An application of the incremental cost framework to biodiversity conservation: a wetland case study in Malaysia. Working Paper GEC 95-15. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, London

  • Lal AK, Singh PP (2003) Economic worth of carbon stored in above ground biomass of India’s Forests. Indian For 129(7):874–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB (2000) Can environmental economic valuation techniques aid ecological economics and wildlife conservation? Wildl Soc Bull 28(1):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur RS, Tiwari RC (1979) Working plan for the West Kalagarh Forest Division, Uttar Pradesh (1979–80 to 1988–89), Nainital Working Plan Circle II, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Myers N (1990) The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspot analysis. Environmentalist 10:243–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Ricketts TH (2006) Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol 4(11):e360. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M (2006) Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol Evol 21(12):681–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton L, Rose R, Treves A (1999) The social dimensions of human–elephant conflict in Africa: a literature review and two case studies from Uganda and Cameroon. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Valuation of biodiversity benefits: selected studies. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1993) Green markets. ICEG, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D (2001) Valuing biological diversity: issues and overview. In: OECD (ed) Valuation of biodiversity benefits. Selected studies. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Negi JDS (1997) Biomass prediction and distribution of organic matter in natural Cinnamomum camphora stand. Indian For 123:1161–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi SB, Yachkaschi A, Oladi D, Fard TS, Latifi H (2009) The recreational valuation of a natural forest park using travel cost method in Iran. Biogeosci For 2:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon JPG (1998) The socio-economic costs and benefits of coastal habitat rehabilitation and creation. Mar Pollut Bull 37(8–12):373–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tvinnereim E, Roine K, Heimdal C (2009) Carbon 2009—emission trading coming home. Point carbon. Oslo, pp 48

  • Wells MP (1992) Biodiversity conservation, affluence and poverty: mismatched costs and efforts to remedy them. Ambio 21(3):237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward RT, Wui YS (2001) The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 37:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to convey our gratitude to the Director and Dean, Wildlife Institute of India for providing guidance and support in executing this work. We gratefully acknowledge the field support extended to us by Mr. Gyan Sarin, Director, Corbett Foundation. We are grateful to Prof. Karin E. Limburg, Conference Committee Coordinator, USEE Conference 2007 and President, United States Society for Ecological Economics for her support and encouragement and for finding funds for the participation of S.A.H. at the USEE Conference. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Ainul Hussain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badola, R., Hussain, S.A., Mishra, B.K. et al. An assessment of ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environmentalist 30, 320–329 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-010-9278-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-010-9278-5

Keywords

Navigation