Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of disposal methods for on-site sewage facilities within the state of Texas, USA

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, 1.5 million homes in Texas, USA utilize an on-site sewage facility to manage their household waste. This study compares the conventional septic dispersal technology of perforated pipe drain field with two of the new technologies recently implemented in Texas, multi-pipe and chamber systems, determining if soil classification and climate are influencing factors in functional ability for each of the technologies. There is no statistical significance for failure of a system with respect to system type or climate zone. The textural classification of soil is a statistically significant variable in septic system failures. Soil type III, which includes the clay groups except pure clays and silty clay, appears to significantly influence system failures. Additionally, occupant misuse and lack of maintenance are contributing factors to system failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bomar G (1993) Climatic atlas of Texas. Texas Department of Water Resources, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady N (2002) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen and Spike (1997) How a house works: what happens after the flush. The Family Handyman

  • Churches K (2003) Septic tanks: the real poop. University of California-Davis Extension Service, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumper D, Yelderman J (2002) Proposal for seven-year review of the PSA, Inc. SB2 gravel-less pipe system in Texas. Baylor University Wastewater Research Program

  • Michael A, John H (1998) Corpus Christi bay national estuary program study of on-site sewage facilities. Corpus Christi, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • National Weather Service November (2003) http://www.nass.usda.gov/tx/cwmap1.htm. Accessed 14 November 2003

  • SAS Institute Inc (1999) SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

  • SAS Institute Inc (2003) Description of program functions. SAS Institute Publication, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas On-Site Wastewater Treatment Research Council (2001) Study to determine the magnitude of, and reasons for, chronically malfunctioning on-site sewage facility systems in Texas

  • TCEQ (2002) Title 30 Texas administrative code, Chap. 285. On-site sewage facilities, p 61

  • US Department of Housing and Urban Development (1977) Treatment and disposal alternatives for domestic sewage management. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research received financial support from the Baylor Wastewater Research Program and the Baylor University Graduate School. The authors wish to thank the County Designated Representatives within the state of Texas of counties chosen for evaluation, the TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), and Jose Guardiola of the Baylor Institute of Statistics for their help and support for the accomplishment of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan E. Carr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carr, M.E., Jumper, D.L. & Yelderman, J.C. A comparison of disposal methods for on-site sewage facilities within the state of Texas, USA. Environmentalist 29, 381–387 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-009-9223-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-009-9223-7

Keywords

Navigation