Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of tree size and spatial distribution on growth of ponderosa pine forests under alternative management scenarios

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest ecosystems may be actively managed toward heterogeneous stand structures to provide both economic (e.g., wood production and carbon credits) and environmental benefits (e.g., invasive pest resistance). In order to facilitate wider adoption of possibly more sustainable forest stand structures, defining growth expectations among alternative management scenarios is crucial. To estimate the effect of tree size and spatial distributions on growth for forest structures commonly considered in uneven-aged forest stand management, large (0.2 ha+) plots were established in 14 uneven-aged ponderosa pine stands in eastern Montana. All study trees were stem-mapped and measured for diameter and 10-year sapwood and basal area increment. A generalized growth model was developed to predict both total and merchantable 10-year basal area increment for nine hypothetical stand structures [three diameter distributions (reverse-J, irregular, flat) × three spatial distributions (clumpy, partial clumpy, uniform)]. Results indicate that the size and spatial distributions of individual trees have a considerable effect on overall stand growth. The greatest total stand growth was in stands with reverse “J” shaped tree size distributions, while the greatest merchantable stand growth was in stands with “flat” diameter distributions and uniform spatial distributions. Through better comprehension of generalized uneven-aged stand growth dynamics, forest managers may better assess the effects of alternative stand structures on stand growth while providing forest stand structures that may be more resilient in a changing climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RR (1986) Silvicultural systems and cutting methods for ponderosa pine forests in the Front Range of the Central Rocky Mountains. General technical report RM-128. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station

  • Arno SA (1979) Forest regions of Montana. Research paper INT-218. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station

  • Arno SA, Fiedler CE (2005) Mimicking nature’s fire: restoring fire-prone forests in the West. Island Press, Covelo, CA

  • Assman E (1970) Growth and yield study. Pergamon Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington WW, Moore MM (1994) Southwestern ponderosa pine structure: changes since Euro-American settlement. J Forest 92:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington WW, Fule PZ, Hart SC, Weaver RP (2001) Modeling ecological restoration effects on ponderosa pine structure. Restor Ecol 9:421–431. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2001.94011.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyea MR, Margolis HA (1994) Historical reconstruction of growth efficiency and its relationship to tree mortality in balsam fir ecosystems affected by spruce budworm. Can J Forest Res 24:2208–2221. doi:10.1139/x94-284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edminster B, Mowrer HT, Mathiasen RL, Schuler TM, Olson WK, Hawksworth FG (1991) GENGYM: a variable density stand table projection system calibrated for mixed conifer and ponderosa pine stands in the Southwest. Research paper RM-297. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler CE (2000) Restoration treatments promote growth and reduce mortality of old-growth ponderosa pine (Montana). Ecol Res 18:117–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Fule PZ, Moore MM, Covington WW (1997) Determining reference conditions for ecosystem management in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecol Appl 7:895–908. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0895:DRCFEM]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fule PZ, McHugh C, Heilein TA, Covington WW (2001) Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments. In: Vance RK, Edminster CB, Covington WW, Blake JA (compilers) Ponderosa pine ecosystems restoration and conservation: steps toward stewardship. Proceedings RMRS-22. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 28–35

  • Grier CC, Running SW (1977) Leaf area of mature northwestern coniferous forests: relation to site water balance. Ecology 58:893–899. doi:10.2307/1936225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall FC (1993) Stocking considerations in uneven-aged management. In: Growth basal area handbook. USDA PNW-R6-Ecol-181b-1984

  • Long JN (1985) A practical approach to density management. Forest Chron 61:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Long JN, Dean TJ (1986) Sapwood area of Pinus contorta stands as a function of mean size and density. Oecologia 68:410–412. doi:10.1007/BF01036747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C et al (2008) Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States. J Forest 106:115–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Miina J (1994) Spatial growth model for Scots pine on drained peat-land. Silva Fenn 28:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien RA, Collins DC (1991) Forest statistics for land outside national forests in west-central Montana. Resource bulletin INT-72. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT

  • O’Brien RA, Conner RC (1991) Forest statistics for land outside national forests in eastern Montana. Resource bulletin INT-71. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT

  • O’Hara KL (1996) Dynamics and stocking-level relationships of multi-aged ponderosa pine stands. Forest Science Monograph 33

  • O’Hara KL, Valappil NI (1995) Sapwood: leaf area prediction equations for multi-aged ponderosa pine stands in western Montana and central Oregon. Can J Forest Res 25:1553–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister RD, Kovalchik BL, Arno SF, Presby RC (1977) Forest habitat types of Montana. General technical report-34. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT

  • Shao G, Shugart HH (1997) A compatible growth-density stand model derived from a distance-dependent individual tree model. Forest Sci 43:443–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. Jpn J Ecol 14:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM, Larson BC, Kelty MJ, Ashton PMS (1997) The practice of silviculture, 9th edn. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest resources of the United States, 2002. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-241. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2004) Natl Rep Sustain Forests 2003: FS-766. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington, DC

  • Waring RH (1983) Estimating forest growth and efficiency in relation to canopy leaf area. Adv Ecol Res 13:327–354. doi:10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60111-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring RH, Schroeder PE, Oren R (1982) Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. Can J Forest Res 12:556–560. doi:10.1139/x82-086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW (2000) The growth and structural dynamics of uneven-aged ponderosa pine stands in eastern Montana. PhD dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT

  • Woodall CW (2008) When is one core per tree sufficient to characterize stand attributes? Results of a Pinus ponderosa case study. Tree Ring Res 64:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Fiedler CE, Milner K (2003) Competition in uneven-aged stands. Can J Forest Res 33:1719–1726. doi:10.1139/x03-096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wykoff WR, Crookston NL, Stage AR (1982) User’s guide to the stand prognosis model. General technical report-133. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    C. W. Woodall & R. E. McRoberts

  2. School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59802, USA

    C. E. Fiedler

Authors
  1. C. W. Woodall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. E. Fiedler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. E. McRoberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. W. Woodall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodall, C.W., Fiedler, C.E. & McRoberts, R.E. Effects of tree size and spatial distribution on growth of ponderosa pine forests under alternative management scenarios. Environmentalist 29, 301–309 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9194-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9194-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation