Skip to main content
Log in

Surveying of aquatic insect diversity of Chandrabhaga river, Garhwal Himalayas

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aquatic insect diversity in the Chandrabhaga, an important headwater stream of Garhwal Himalayas, was surveyed for a period of twelve months (October 1999 to September 2000). All the important physico-chemical environmental variables (temperature, water velocity, hydromedian depth, transparency, turbidity, total dissolved solids, pH, alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, free CO2, nitrates, phosphates, sodium and potassium) of the aquatic ecosystem were measured monthly for one year. Aquatic insects were sampled from three sites (S1, S2 & S3) of the headwater stream Chandrabhaga. Aquatic insects of Chandrabhaga were represented by the members of the orders of Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Plecoptera and Odonata. The maximum density of aquatic insects was recorded in the month of March (4,165 ind. m−2) and minimum in the month of August (680 ind. m−2). The annual contribution of Trichoptera (38%) and Ephemeroptera (32%) was observed to be maximum, while Odonata contributed minimum (2%) to the total aquatic insect density. The present study on the relationship between physico-chemical environmental variables and the density of aquatic insects revealed that the velocity of water, hydromedian depth, turbidity and dissolved oxygen in addition to composition and texture of the bottom substrates have significant impact on benthic aquatic insects’ density and their diversity. The ecological relevance of the measured hydrological attributes was investigated by composing their degree of correlation with insects density and diversity. The diversity index (Shannon–Weiner) of aquatic insects dwelling in the Chandrabhaga river ranged from 2.54 to 3.86. Some of the natural and anthropogenic environmental factors contributing towards the degradation of the watershed of the Chandrabhaga have been identified, and ameliorative measures for the conservation of the aquatic insect diversity have been suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Angradi, T. R. (1996). Inter-habitat variation in benthic community structure function and organic matter storage in 3 appalachian headwater streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society (USA), 15, 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. New York: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. D., Mars, D., Wright, J. F., & Furse, M. T. (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running watersites. Water Research, 17, 333–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badola, S. P. (1979). Ecological studies on the Ichthyofauna of some water sources of Garhwal region, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Zoology, H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar, 280 pp.

  • Bisht, R. S., & Das, S. M. (1979a). Aquatic insects in relation to coldwater fisheries of kumaon lakes. Environment India, 2, 49–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisht, R. S., & Das, S. M. (1979b). Aquatic Entomofauna in relation to coldwater fisheries of Kumaon, India (pp. 37–38). Second All India Seminar on Ichthyology, Nanital, India.

  • Biswas, S., Mukhopadhyay, P., & Saha S. K. (1995). Insecta: Coleoptera. Zoological Survey of India, Series, 3, 1–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovee, K. D., & Milhous, R. (1978). Hydraulic simulations in in-stream flow studies: Theory and technique. Instream flow information paper 5, FWS/OBS-78/33. Cooperative Instream Flow Service Group. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

  • Bretschko, G., & Klemens, W. E. (1986). Quantitative method and aspect in the study of the interstitial fauna of the running waters. Stygologia, 2, 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, B., & Biggs, B. J. F. (1997). Relationship between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biology, 38, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, B., & Biggs, B. J. F. (1998). Stream flow variability indices for riverine environmental studies. In W. H. Kirby (Ed.), A changing environment (pp. 357–364). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, B., & Biggs, B. J. F. (2000). Flow variable for ecological temperate streams: groupings based on covariance. Journal of Hydrology, 237, 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J., & Smith, B. J. (1995). Sticky trapping of adult mayflies, stoneflies and caddisflies alongside three contrasting streams near Hamilton, New Zealand. New Zealand Natural Sciences, 22, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J., Smith, B. J., & Baillie, B. R. (1997). Summer light catches of adult chiropteran in hill country catchments of contrasting land use, Walkathon. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 31, 623–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J., Smith, B. J., & Quinn, J. M. (2000). Biodiversity of stream invertebrate fauna in a Walkathon hill-country catchment in relation to land use, New Zealand. Entomologist, 23, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. M. (1971). Teaching and research in limnology in India (pp. 67–72). Proceedings of the Symposium UGC NCSE, Bangalore.

  • Edington J. M., & Hildrew A. G. (1995). Caseless Caddis larvae of the British Isles: A key with ecological notes (pp. 1–237). Cumbria, UK.

  • Elliott, J. M., & Humpsech U. H. (1983). A key to the adults of the British Ephemeroptera (pp 1–101). Cumbria, UK: Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside.

  • Elliott, J. M., Humpsech U. H., & Macan T. T. (1988). Larvae of the British Ephemeroptera: A key with ecological notes. Cumbria, U.K.: Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside, 1–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, D. C., & Mahoney, S. D. (1983). Recovery after logging in streams with and without buffer stripes. Northern California: Calif. Water Research Center, University of California, pp. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P. (1984). Substrate association and longitudinal distribution in species of Ephemerellidae (Ephemeroptera: Insect) from Western Oregon. Freshwater Invertebrate Biology, 3(94), 18–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. (1993). Adults and nymphs of British stoneflies (Plecoptera): A key (pp. 1–101). Cumbria, U.K.: Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside.

  • Hynes, K. E. (1998). Benthic macroinvertebrate diversity and biotic indices for monitoring of 5 urban and urbanizing lake within the Haliax regional municipality (HRM) (pp. 14, 114). Nova Scotia Canada Soil and Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax.

  • Jacobsen, D., Rostgaard, S., & Vasconez, J. J. (2003). Are macroinvertebrates in high altitude streams affected by oxygen deficiency? Freshwater Biology, 48, 2025–2032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, P. C., Kumar, K., Badoni, V., & Singh, A. (2002). An ecological study on the above ground Entomofauna of Nanda Devi biosphere reserve. In: J. K. Sharma, P. S. Easa, C. Mohanan, N. Sasidharan, R. K. Rai (Eds.), Biosphere reserves in India and their management (pp. 143–149). New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India.

  • Kaul, V. (1977). Limnological survey of Kashmir lakes with reference to trophic status and conservation. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 3, 29–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., & Khanna V. (1984). A review of the taxonomy and ecology of Odonata larvae from India. Oriental Insurance, 17, 127–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhl, D. M. (1972). Change in thermal regime as a cause of reduction of benthic fauna downstream of resources. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, 1322–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, R. T. (2003). Ecology and biogeography of Odonata with special reference to Indian fauna. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, 202, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. Mitra, & Nandi, N. C. (1998). Impact of anthropogenic activities on Hoogli Estuary with special reference to the distribution pattern of intertidal macrozoobenthos. In A. K. Aditya & P. Haldar (Eds.), Proceedings of the National Seminar on Environmental Biology (pp. 94–101). Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, April.

  • Pennak, R. W. (1943). Limnological variables in a Colorado mountain stream. American Midland Naturalist, 29, 186–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. M., Copper, A. B., Davis-Colley R. J., Rutherford, J. C., & Williamson, R. B. (1997). Land-use effects on habitat, water quality, Periphyton and Benthic invertebrates in Waikato, New Zealand, Hill Country Streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 31, 579–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M., & Resh, V. H. (1993). Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic invertebrates (pp. 1–448). New York: Chapman and Hall.

  • Shannon, C. E., & Wiener, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. C. (1984). Potamological studies on lotic environment of the upland River Bhagirathi of Garhwal Himalaya. Environment Ecology, 2(4), 239–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. C. (1986). Effect of physico-chemical factors on benthic fauna of Bhagirathi River, Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Journal of Ecology, 13, 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. C., Bhanot, G., & Singh, D. (2004). Aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in Nanda Devi biosphere Reserve, India. The Environmentalist, 24, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, M. R., & Hawkins, C. P. (1998). Biodiversity of stream insects: variations at local basin and regional scales. Annual Reviews of Entomology, 43, 271–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. J., Sharp, A. K., Breen, P. F., & Sonneman, J. A. (2001). Effect of urbanization on streams of the melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. I. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities. Freshwater Biology, 46, 535–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., & Stanford, J. A. (1979). Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. Ecology of regulated streams (pp. 35–53). Plenom Publishing Corporation.

  • Ward, J. V., & Tockner, K. (2001). Biodiversity: Towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biology, 46, 807–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace I. D., Wallace B., & Philipson G. M (1990). A key to the case-bearing caddis larvae of Britain and Ireland (pp. 1–237). Cumbria, UK: Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside.

  • Wetzel, R. G. (1983). Limnology (2nd ed., 858 pp.). Philadelphia: Saunders Coll.

  • Wetzel, R. G. (2000). Freshwater ecology: changes, requirements and future demands. Limnology, 1, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial assistance received from the Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), Government of India, New Delhi, under the major research project is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to Ms Rekha, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Environmental Sciences, H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar-Garhwal, India, for help in preparation of illustrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramesh C. Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Sharma, R.C. & Anthwal, A. Surveying of aquatic insect diversity of Chandrabhaga river, Garhwal Himalayas. Environmentalist 28, 395–404 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9155-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9155-z

Keywords

Navigation