Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss among pulse processing workers

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Occupational noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) has been recognised as a problem among workers in Indian industries. The major industries in India are based on the processing of agricultural products. There are appreciable numbers of pulse processing units spread throughout the country. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of hearing loss among pulse processing workers. As a part of hearing protection intervention, audiometric tests were conducted at the binaural low (250–1,500 Hz), the binaural mid (1,500–4,000 Hz) and the binaural high (3,000–8,000 Hz) frequency averages. The prevalence of hearing loss was determined based on hearing threshold levels (HTLs) with a low fence of 25 dB. Over 50% of pulse processing workers (dana bazaar and dal mill) showed hearing loss in the noise-sensitive higher (binaural mid and high) frequencies. The rate of hearing loss was particularly high among workers in the dal mill. The analyses show a higher risk of prevalence of hearing loss among the dal mill workers compared to the workers associated with the grain preprocessing activities. The study shows alarming signals of NIHL, especially in the dal mill workers. The occupational exposure to noise could be minimised by efficient control measures through engineering controls, administrative controls and the use of personal protective devices. Applications of engineering and/or administrative controls are frequently not feasible in developing countries for technical and financial reasons. A complete hearing conservation programme, including training, audiometry and the use of hearing protection devices, is the most feasible method for the protection of industrial workers from prevailing noise in workplace environments in the developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage, P., & Berry, G. (1994). Statistical Methods in Medical Research (3rd ed., pp. 103–115, 207–214). New York: Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publication, ISBN 0-632-03695-8.

  • Batmanabane, G., & Ramchandran, A. (2003). Effects of acute exposure to loud occupational noise during daytime on the nocturnal sleep architecture, heart rate and cortisol secretion in healthy volunteers. Journal of Occupational Health, 45, 146–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchgrevink, H. (2003). Does health promotion work in relation to noise? Noise Health, 5(18), 25–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruel & Kjaer Limited (1999). 'Manual Noise Dose Meter', type-4436. Denmark.

  • Carmelo A., Giorgianni, C., Munao, F., Renato, B., Maria, A. T., Giovanni, B., Graziella, D. A., & Germano, D. (2005). Influence of environmental factors on the evolution of industrial noise-induced hearing loss. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 107, 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debray P., Misra J., & Ghosh, C. (2002). Peak expiratory and cardio-respiratory fitness of Bengali workers exposed to dust and plant source particulate matters. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 27(4), 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. M. (2004). Introduction to environmental engineering and science (2nd ed., pp. 122–152). Singapore: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, M. I., Hwang, S. A., Sobotova, L., Stark, A. D., & May, J. J. (2001). A comparison of self reported hearing loss and audiometry in a Cohort of New York farmers. Journal Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 1201–1208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, A. (2001). India grain and feed shopping for pulses 2001. Foreign Agriculture Sevice Grain Report, US Embassy, New Delhi.

  • Khuraibet, A. M., & Al-Attar, F. (2000). Preliminary assessment of indoor industrial noise pollution in Kuwait. The Environmentalist, 20, 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madbuli, H. N., & Jamil, A. T. M. (2003). Noise pollution in textile, printing and publishing industries in Saudi Arabia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 83, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, J. N. (1997). Exposure assessment in occupational epidemiology: Measuring present exposures with an example of a study of occupational asthma. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 70, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, S., Fried, Y., & Froom, P. (2001). The interactive effect of chronic exposure to noise and job complexity on changes in blood pressure and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of industrial employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 182–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noise and Hearing Loss (1990). National institute of health consensus development conference statement. NIH Consens Statement 1990 January 22–24; 8(1), 1–24.

  • OiSaeng, H. (2005). Hearing loss among operating engineers in American construction industry. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 78, 565–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, H., & Ivo, M. (1998). Indoor climate and air quality. International Journal of Biometeorology, 42, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, P. W. (1982). Hearing ability of persons by sociodemographic and health characteristics; United States 1977 [DHHS Publication No (PHS) 82-1568]. Hyatville: US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindhusake, D., Mitchell, P., Smith, W., Golding, M., Newall, P., Hartley, D., & Rubin, G. (2001). Validation of self-reported hearing loss—the blue mountains hearing study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. T. Ingle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, V.S., Ingle, S.T. Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss among pulse processing workers. Environmentalist 28, 358–365 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9148-y

Keywords

Navigation