Advertisement

The Environmentalist

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 453–456 | Cite as

Safe alternative cancer therapy using electromagnetic fields

  • Ivan L. CameronEmail author
  • Nicholas J. Short
  • Marko S. Markov
Article

Abstract

This article highlights recent research on the beneficial use of selected low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) as a safe alternative therapy for treatment of cancer and other health problems. It is shown that EMF therapy provides a safe alternative and adjunct modality for the treatment of cancer and other health problems, and therefore, research in this field deserves more support. The paper also discusses some reports and hypothesis of potential risk of human exposure to low frequency EMF, mainly to the power line frequency of 60 Hz.

Keywords

Bioelectromagnetics Cancer therapy Electromagnetic field (EMF) EMF risks EMF therapy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bassett, C. A. L. (1989). Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutical uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). Critical Review of Biomedical Engineering, 17, 451–529.Google Scholar
  2. Cameron, I. L., Hardman, W. E., Winters, W. D., Zimmerman, S., & Zimmerman, A. M. (1993). Environmental magnetic fields: Influences on early embryogenesis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 51, 417–425.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, I. L., Hunter, K. E., & Winters, W. D. (1985). Retardation of embryogenesis by extremely low frequency 60 Hz electromagnetic fields. Physiological Chemistry and Physics and Medical NMR, 17, 135–138.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, I. L., Short, N. J., & Markov, M. S. (2006). Daily pulsed electromagnetic field therapy inhibits tumor angiogenesis via hipoxia driven pathway: Therapeutic implications. In P. Kostarakis (Ed.), Proceedings of Forth International Workshop “Biological effects of electromagnetic fields” (pp. 1285–1292). Crete 16–20 October 2006, ISBN# 960-233-172-0.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, I. L., Sun, L. Z., Short, N., Hardman, W. E., & Williams, C. D. (2005a). Daily pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy inhibits tumor angiogenesis via the hypoxia driven pathway. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research, 46, 1236.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, I. L., Sun, L. Z., Short, N., Hardman, W. E., & Williams, C. D. (2005b). Therapeutic electromagnetic field (TEMF) and gamma irradiation on human breast cancer xenograft growth, angiogenesis and metastasis. Cancer Cell International, 5, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hepworth, S. J., Schoemaker, M. J., Muir, K. R., Swerdlow, A. J., van Tongeren, M. J., & McKinney, P. A. (2006). Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults: Case-control study. British Medical Journal, 332, 883–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ivancsits, S., Diem, E., Jahn, O., & Rudiger, H. W. (2003). Intermittent extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA damage in a dose-dependent way. Archives of Occupational Environmental Health, 76, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lankola, A., Auvinen, A., Ratanen, J., Schoemaker, M. J., Christensen, H. C., Feychting, M., Jahansen, C., Klaeboe, L., Lonn, S., Swerdlow, A. J., Tynes, T., & Salminen, T. (2007). Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries. International Journal of Cancer, 120(8), 1769–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Markov, M. S. (1994). Biophysical estimation of the environmental importance of electromagnetic fields. Review of Environmental Health, 10(2), 75–83.Google Scholar
  11. Markov, M. S. (2000). Dosimetry of magnetic fields in the radio frequency range. In B. J. Klauenberg & D. Miklavcic (Eds.), Radio frequency radiation dosimetry (pp. 239–245). New York: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Markov, M. S. (2006). Thermal vs. nonthermal mechanisms of interactions between electromagnetic fields and biological systems. In S. Ayrapetyan & M. Markov (Eds.), Bioelectromagnetics: Current concepts (pp. 1–15). NATO Advanced Research Workshops Series, Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Markov, M. S., Hazlewood, C. F., & Ericsson, A. D. (2005). Systemic effect: A new approach to magnetic field therapy. The Environmentalist, 25(2/3), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Markov, M. S., Williams, C. D., Cameron, I. L., Hardman, W. E., & Salvatore, J. R. (2004). Can magnetic field inhibit angiogenesis and tumor growth. In P. J. Rosch & M. S. Markov (Eds.), Bioelectromagnetic medicine (pp. 625–636). NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  15. Repacholi, M., Saunders, R., van Deventer, E., & Kheifets, L. (2005). Guest editors’ introduction: Is EMF a potential environmental risk for children?. Bioelectromagnetics, 7, S2–S4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosch, P. J., & Markov, M. S. (2004) Bioelectromagnetic medicine. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, p. 880.Google Scholar
  17. Salvatore, J. R., & Markov, M. S. (2004). Electromagnetic fields as an adjuvant therapy to antineoplastic chemotherapy. In P. J. Rosch & M. S. Markov (Eds.), Bioelectromagnetic medicine (pp. 613–624). NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  18. Scarfi, M. R., Sannino, A., Perrotta, A., Sarti, M., Mesirca, P., & Bersani, F. (2005) Evaluation of genotoxic effects in human fibroblasts after intermittent exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: A confirmatory study. Radiation Research, 164, 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schüz, J., Bohler, E., Berg, G., Schlehofer, B., Hettinger, I., Schlaefer, K., Wahrendorf, J., Kunna-Grass, K., & Blettner, M. (2006). Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany). American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Todorov N. (1982). Magnetotherapy. Sofia: Meditzina i Physcultura Publishing House, p. 106.Google Scholar
  21. Vijayalaxmi, V. & Obe, G. (2004). Controversial cytogenetic observations in mammalian somatic cells exposed to radiofrequency radiation. Radiation Research, 162, 481–496.Google Scholar
  22. Wertheimer, N., & Leeper, E. (1979). Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 273–284.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, C. D., Markov, M. S., Hardman, W. E., & Cameron, I. L. (2001). Therapeutic electromagnetic field effects on angiogenesis and tumor growth. Anticancer Research, 21, 3887–3892.Google Scholar
  24. Yamaguchi, S., Ogiue-Ikeda, M., Sekino, M., & Ueno, S. (2006). Effects of pulsed magnetic stimulation on tumor development and immune functions in mice. Bioelectromagnetics, 27, 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan L. Cameron
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicholas J. Short
    • 1
  • Marko S. Markov
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cellular and Structural BiologyUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Research InternationalWilliamsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations