Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spray optimization through application and liquid physical property variables–I

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most important considerations when optimizing a spray application for maximum efficacy and minimum drift is the selection of the optimum droplet size spectrum (Hewitt, A. J., 1997. The importance of droplet size in agricultural spraying. Atomization and Sprays, 7(3), 235–244). Applicators are faced with an extensive selection of nozzle types, tank mixes and adjuvants. The present paper discusses the way that the tank mix and application variables interact to produce specific spray characteristics of droplet size spectrum, coverage and performance in total spray efficiency. Experimental data investigating the effects of liquid physical properties such as dynamic surface tension, shear and extensional viscosity are described. Spray formation from emulsions, surfactants and oils is also discussed. Atomization studies conducted in wind tunnels using a wide range of atomizer and nozzle types under different operating conditions are discussed. Empirical models for predicting atomization and drift of sprays are described with emphasis on their development and practical use for spray optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon, (1999). Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. Standard S-572, American Society for Testing and Materials, Niles, MI.

  • Bode, L. E. (1984). Downwind drift deposits by ground applications. Proceedings pesticide drift management symposium (pp. 50). South Dakota State University.

  • Butler-Ellis, M. C., & Tuck, C. R. (1998). Predicting spray droplet size from three nozzle designs using physical properties of spray liquids containing adjuvants. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. (pp. 383–400). On Adjuvants and Agrochemicals, Memphis, TN.

  • Butler-Ellis, M. C., Tuck, C. R., & Miller, P. C. H. (1999). Dilute emulsions and their effect on the breakup of the liquid sheet produced by flat-fan spray nozzles. Atomization and Sprays, 9, 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler-Ellis, M. C., & Tuck, C. R. (2000). The variation in characteristics of air-included sprays with adjuvants. Aspects of Applied Biology, 57, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byass, J. B., & Lake, J. R. (1977). Spray drift from a tractor-powered field sprayer. Pesticide Science, 8, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, A. C., Downer, R. A., & Hall, F. R. (1991). The influence of pump system and recirculation on the atomization of spray formulations. In L.E. Bode & D.G. Chasin (Eds.), Pesticide formulations and application systems (Vol. 11, pp. 193–205), ASTM STP 1112.

  • Dexter, R. W. (1996a). Measurement of extensional viscosity for polymer solutions and its effects on atomization from a spray nozzle. Atomization and Sprays, 6, 167–191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, R. W. (1996b). Interactions of anionic surfactants and polymers used as spray tank adjuvants. In M. J. Hopkinson, H. M. Collins & G. R. Goss (Eds.), Pesticide formulation and application systems (Vol. 16), ASTM STP 1312. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Dexter, R. W. (2000). Emulsion properties and agricultural spray quality. Proceedings eighth international conference on liquid atomization and spray systems (pp. 341–348), Pasadena, CA.

  • Dexter, R. W. (2001). Fluid properties and spray quality. In A. K. Viets, R. S. Tann, & J. C. Mueninghoff (Eds.), Pesticide formulations and applications systems (Vol. 20), ASTM STP 1400, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

  • Doble, S. J., Matthews, G. A., Rutherford, I., & Southcombe, E. S. E. (1985). A system for classifying hydraulic nozzles and other atomizers into categories of spray quality. Proceedings of 1985 British crop protection conference – weeds, 9A-6, 1125–1133.

  • EPA, (1999). Spray drift of pesticides. EPA Publication No.735 F99024, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

  • Esterly, D. M. (1998). Neural Network Analysis of Spray Drift Task Force DROPKICK II.TM ASAE Paper No. 981014. Orlando, FL, American Society for Agricultural Engineers, Niles, MI.

  • Fainerman, V. B., Makievski, A. V., & Miller, R. (1993). The measurement of dynamic surface tensions of highly viscous liquids by the maximum bubble pressure method. Colloids and Surfaces, Part A, 75, 229–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fainerman, V. B., Miller, R., & Joos, P. (1994). The measurement of dynamic surface tension by the maximum bubble pressure method. Colloid Polymer Science, 272, 731.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. E., & Furmidge, C. G. L. (1967). The viscosity and size of invert emulsion droplets used in pesticidal sprays. Proc. 3rd. Int. Agric. Aviat. Congr. pp. 172–179.

  • Fraser, R. P. (1958). Advances in Pert Central Research. Vol. 2, Interscience.

  • Haq, K. A., & Rahman, M. (1979). An analysis of rheological properties of pesticide solutions as they affect atomization and drop size distributions (pp. 1–18), ASAE Paper 79–1504.

  • Hermansky, C. G. (1998). A regression model for estimating spray quality from nozzle, application and physical property data. Proc. ILASS-America, 1998 (pp. 60–64). Sacramento, CA.

  • Hermansky, C. G., & Boger, D. V. (1995). Opposing-jet viscometry of fluids with viscosity approaching that of water. Journal Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 56, 1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermansky, C. G., & Krause, G. F. (1997). Relevant physical property measurements for adjuvants. Proc. ISAA 4th International Conference, pp. 20–26.

  • Hewitt, A. J. (1993). Droplet size spectra produced by air-assisted atomizers. Journal Aerosol Science, 24(2), 155–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, A. J. (1997). The importance of droplet size in agricultural spraying. Atomization and Sprays, 7(3), 235–244.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, A. J. (1998). The effects of tank mix and adjuvants on spray drift. Proc. Fifth International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals, Memphis, TN.

  • Hewitt, A. J., & Hermansky, C. G. (1997). Effect of liquid properties on spray performance. Proc. chem show, New York, NY.

  • Hewitt, A. J., Huddleston, E. W., Sanderson, R., & Ross, J. B. (1993). Effect of adjuvants and formulations on aerial spray drift potential. Pesticide Science, 37, 209–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, A. J., Valcore, D. L., & Bryant, J. E. (1996). Spray drift task force atomization droplet size spectra measurements. Proc. ILASS-Americas 96, San Francisco, CA.

  • Hewitt, A. J., Stern, A. J., Bagley, W. E., & Dexter, R. (1999). The formation of A new ASTM E35.22 task group to address drift management adjuvants. In R. S. Tann, J. D. Nalewaja, & A. Viets (Eds), 19 th symposium on pesticide formulations and applications systems: Global pest control formulations for the next millennium, ASTM STP 1373, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

  • Hewitt, A. J., & Bagley, W. E. (2000). Evaluation of the effects of adjuvants on agricultural spray characteristics. Proc. eighth international conference on liquid atomization and spray systems (pp. 386–390), Pasadena, CA.

  • Lefebvre, A. H. (1989). Atomization and sprays. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. C. H., Hewitt, A. J., & Bagley, W. E. (2001). Adjuvant effects on spray characteristics and drift potential (in review). Pesticide formulations and applications systems, ASTM STP, (Vol. 21) American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

  • Riley, C. M., Sears, I. I., Picot, J. J. C., & Chapman, T. J. (1995). Spray drift task force droplet evaporation studies. In F. R. Hall, P. D. Berger, & H. M. Collins (Eds.), Pesticide formulations and application systems: 14th Volume, STP 1234 (pp. 225–236). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, R., Hewitt, A. J., Huddleston, E. W., Ross, J., & Bagley, W. (1993). Effect of spray additives on droplet size & drift potential of aerial sprays. Proc. BCPC Conf., UK.

  • Shewchuk, S. R., Wallace, K., & Maybank, J. (1988). A review of methodology for measuring the drift and deposition of herbicides and insecticides for forestry applications. Technical Report No. 220, Saskatchewan Research Council.

  • Southcombe, E. S. E., Miller, P. C. H., Ganzelmeier, H., Van de Zande, J. C., Miralles, A., & Hewitt, A. J. (1997). The international (BCPC) spray classification system including a drift potential factor. Proceedings British Crop Protection Conference, 5A-1, 371–380.

  • Spanoghe, P., Van der Meeren, P., & Steurbaut, W. (2000). The influence of dynamic surface tension on atomisation and retention of agrochemical active ingredients. Proc. 5 th World surfactants congress, Cesio, Committee European des Agents de Surface et Leurs Intermediaires Organiques, 2, 899–907.

  • Teske, M. E., Hermansky, C. G., & Riley, C. M. (1997). Evaporation rates of agricultural spray material at low relative wind speeds. Atomization and Sprays, 8(4), 471–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teske, M. E., Bird, S. L., Esterly, D. M., Ray, S. L., & Perry, S. G. (2000). A user’s guide for AgDRIFT® 2.0: A tiered approach for the assessment of spray drift of pesticides. Continuum Dynamics, Inc., Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcore, D. L. (2001). Spray drift task force database and models on pesticide drift. Spray optimization through application and liquid physical property variables, pesticide formulation & application: “How to reduce the side effects by means of new methods” 2 nd international in-depth symposium, OpdenKamp R&N, The Hague, Netherlands.

  • Yates, W. E., Cowden, R. E., & Akesson, N. B. (1985). Drop size spectra from nozzles in high-speed airstream. TRANS of the ASAE, 28(2), 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the Spray Drift Task Force, its member companies and the numerous research scientists in the U.S., U.K., Australia and Canada who have been involved in the extensive research program over the last 10 years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stewart Agricultural Research Services, P. O. Box 509, Macon, MO, 63552, USA

    Andrew J. Hewitt

Authors
  1. Andrew J. Hewitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Hewitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewitt, A.J. Spray optimization through application and liquid physical property variables–I. Environmentalist 28, 25–30 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9044-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9044-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation