Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water injustices and potential remedies in indigenous rural contexts: A water justice analysis

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines Indigenous water rights in rural and remote Australia and how water justice seems to be elusive in many of these spaces. The purpose of this literature review is to link water justice theory and practices to the way different water cultures are valued in Australia while simultaneously critiquing the water justice movement. This paper situates the notion of water justice as a specific kind of environmental justice to cater for the unique qualities that define this resource. In doing so, this paper draws on Schlosberg’s (2004) conception of environmental justice with its trivalent approach that describes the following three ‘circles of concern’: recognition of difference, plurality of participation, and finally equitable distribution of resources and costs and benefits. This framework provides that if the first two ‘circles of concern’ are not in existence in a natural resource management process, then inequitable distribution of that resource is a likely outcome. This paper presents two areas where water injustices exist in the context of Indigenous rural and remote Australia. The first relates to how Indigenous rights to water have been inadequately recognized and the second presents empirical data on water supply and sanitation in rural and remote Indigenous communities that demonstrates ongoing dilemmas around securing this basic human right. The undervaluing of cultural differences relating to water is argued to be antecedent to the injustice manifest in poor water supply and sanitation provision for Indigenous rural contexts. This paper does not attempt to survey the body of ethnographic work on society-water relations in rural and remote Indigenous Australian contexts but reviews the gaps in current mainstream acknowledgement of Indigenous water cultures. In exploring water justice in rural and remote Indigenous Australia, this paper offers a novel approach to a dilemma more frequently analysed solely as a health development issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asmal, K.: 2001, ‘Water is a Catalyst for Peace,’ International Journal of Water 1(2), 200–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics: 2003, Population Characteristics: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, Catalogue no. 3238.0, ABS, Canberra.

  • Bailie, R.S., Carson, B.E., and McDonald, E.L.: 2004, ‘Water Supply and Sanitation in Remote Indigenous Communities—Priorities for Health Development,’ Aust NZ Journal of Public Health 28(5), 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K.: 2003, ‘Archipelagos and Networks: Urbanization and Water Privatization in the South,’ The Geographical Journal 169(4), 328–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M. and Clarke, T.: 2002, Blue Gold: The Battle Against Corporate Theft of the World’s Water, Earthscan, London.

  • Behrendt, J. and Thompson, P.: 2003, The Recognition and Protection of Aboriginal Interests in NSW Rivers, Healthy Rivers Commission, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budds, J. and McGranahan, G.: 2003. ‘Are the Debates on Water Privatisation Missing the Point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America,’ Environment and Urbanisation 15(2), 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard, K.S., D’Antoine, H.A., Eggington, D.G., Henry, B.R., Martin, C.A., and Mooney, G.H.: 2005, “‘Mutual” Obligation in Indigenous Health: Can Shared Responsibility Agreements be Truly Mutual?,’ MJA 182(10), 502–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, D.: 1991, ‘Aboriginal Interests and Perspectives,’ in J.W. Handmer, A.H.J., Dorcey, and D.I. Smith (eds.), Negotiating Water: Conflict Resolution in Australian Water Management. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, ANU, Canberra, pp. 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A.: 1998, Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubash, N.K.: 2004, ‘Water, Markets and Embedded Institutions in Western India,’ in R. Peet and M. Watts (eds.), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements. Routledge, London, pp. 218–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friends of the Earth International: 2003, Water Justice for All: Global and Local Resistance to the Control and Commodification of Water, Vol. 102. Friends of the Earth International, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garn, M., Isham, J., and Kähkönen, S.: 2002, Should We Bet On Private or Public Water Utilities In Cambodia? Evidence on Incentives and Performance from Seven Provincial Towns, Middlebury College Economic Discussion Paper 02–19, Department of Economics, Middlebury College.

  • Groenfeldt, D.: 2004, ‘Indigenous Perspectives on Water and Development,’ Indigenous Law Bulletin 5(29), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, B., Henderson, G., Houston, S., Wade, A., and Walker, B.: 1993, ‘Water Supply and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health: An Overview,’ AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics 14(2/3), 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • HREOC Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner: 2001, Social Justice Report 2001, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Sydney, http://www.hreoc.gov.au/social_justice/sjreport_01/index.html, (accessed 23rd June, 2005).

  • Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission: 1994, Water: A Report on the Provision of Water and Sanitation in Remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Commonwealth of Australia, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission: 2001, Review of the 1994 Water Report, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Commonwealth of Australia, Sydney, http://www.hreoc.gov.au/racial_discrimination/water_report/ (accessed 4th July, 2005).

  • Jackson, S.: 2005, ‘Indigenous Values and Water Resource Management: A Case Study from the Northern Territroy,’ Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 12(3), 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, M: 2002, Freshwater, Background Briefing Papers on Indigenous Water Rights, Lingiari Foundation, Broome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M., Strelein, L., and Weir, J.: 2004a, Indigenous Rights to Water in the Murray, AIATSIS Research Discussion Paper 14, Native Title Research Unit, Canberra.

  • Morgan, M., Strelein, L., and Weir, J.: 2004b, ‘Indigenous Water Rights within the Murray Darling Basin,’ Indigenous Law Bulletin 5(29), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Faircheallaigh, C.: 2004, Native Title and Agreement Making in the Mining Industry: Focusing on Outcomes for Indigenous Peoples, AIATSIS Issues Paper 25, Native Title Research Unit, Canberra.

  • Rawls, J.: 1972. A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A.: 1999, The Cost of Living: The Greater Common Good and the End of Imagination, Flamingo, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D.: 2004, ‘Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements and Political Theories,’ Environmental Politics 13(3), 517–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V.: 2002, Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution and Profit, South End Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.I.: 1998, Water in Australia: Resources and Management, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, C., Bullock, S., and Scott, A.: 2001, Environmental Justice: Rights and Means to a Healthy Environment for All, Centre for Economic and Social Rights, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V.: 2005, ‘Water Works: Agency and Creativity in the Mitchell River Catchment,’ Australian Journal of Anthropology 16(3), 366–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint, S., Sullivan, P., Yu, S., and Mularty, M. 2001. Fitzroy Valley Indigenous Cultural Values Study, Unpublished Report for the Water and Rivers Commission and Centre for Anthropological Research, University of Western Australia, Perth.

  • World Bank: 2005, ‘Privatizing Water and Sanitation Services,’ The World Bank Group website, http://rru.worldbank.org/PapersLinks/Privatizing-Water-Sanitation-Services/, (accessed 10th July, 2005).

  • Yu, P.: 1997, ‘Multilateral Agreements—A New Accountability in Aboriginal Affairs,’ in G. Yunupingu (ed.), Our Land is Our Life: Land Rights—Past, Present and Future. University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, pp. 168–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jess McLean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLean, J. Water injustices and potential remedies in indigenous rural contexts: A water justice analysis. Environmentalist 27, 25–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9012-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9012-0

Keywords

Navigation